Split `SelectionContext::select` into fns that take a binder and don't
*most* usages of `SelectionContext::select` don't need to use a binder, but wrap them in a dummy because of the signature. Let's split this out into `SelectionContext::{select,poly_select}` and limit the usages of the latter.
Right now, we only have 3 places where we're calling `poly_select` -- fulfillment, internally within the old solver, and the auto-trait finder.
r? `@lcnr`
Do not assert >1 RPITITs on collect_return_position_impl_trait_in_trait_tys
Fixes#113403
Assert on collect_return_position_impl_trait_in_trait_tys is not correct when we call it from type_of(GAT). The included test is an example of a situation that collector collects 0 types.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Prefer object candidates in new selection
`dyn Any` shouldn't be using [this implementation](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/any/trait.Any.html#impl-Any-for-T) during codegen.
Prefer object candidates over other candidates, except for other object candidates.
Don't call `type_of` on TAIT in defining scope in new solver
It's *never* productive to call `consider_auto_trait_candidate` on a TAIT in the defining scope, since it will always lead to a query cycle since we call `type_of` on the TAIT. So let's just don't.
I've reserved this behavior just to `SolverMode::Normal` just to avoid any future problems, since this is *technically* incomplete since we're discarding a candidate that could *theoretically* apply. But given such candidate assembly *always* leads to a query cycle, I think it's relatively low risk, and I could be convinced otherwise and make this apply to both solver mode. I assume it's far less likely to be encountered in coherence, though.
This is much more likely to encounter in the new solver, though it can also be encountered in the old solver too, so I'm happy to discuss whether this new behavior we even want in the first place...
I encountered this in a couple of failing UI tests:
* `tests/ui/type-alias-impl-trait/issue-62000-associate-impl-trait-lifetimes.rs`
* `tests/ui/type-alias-impl-trait/issue-93411.rs`
r? `@lcnr`
Dont ICE for `dyn* Trait: Trait` (built-in object) goals during selection in new trait solver
We were ICEing too eagerly during selection for `dyn*` goals -- both for dyn unsizing candidates and for built-in object candidates. The former should only be performed on `dyn` objects, but the latter are totally fine.
Move `TyCtxt::mk_x` to `Ty::new_x` where applicable
Part of rust-lang/compiler-team#616
turns out there's a lot of places we construct `Ty` this is a ridiculously huge PR :S
r? `@oli-obk`
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #111119 (style-guide: Add chapter about formatting for nightly-only syntax)
- #112791 (llvm ffi: Expose `CallInst->setTailCallKind`)
- #113145 (style-guide: Document newline rules for assignment operators)
- #113163 (Add a regression test for #112895)
- #113332 (resolve: Use `Interned` for some interned structures)
- #113334 (Revert the lexing of `c"…"` string literals)
- #113350 (Fix the issue of wrong diagnosis for extern pub fn)
- #113371 (Fix submodule handling when the current branch is named after a tag)
- #113384 (style-guide: Clarify grammar for small patterns (not a semantic change))
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Revert the lexing of `c"…"` string literals
Fixes \[after beta-backport\] #113235.
Further progress is tracked in #113333.
This PR *manually* reverts parts of #108801 (since a git-revert would've been too coarse-grained & messy)
and git-reverts #111647.
CC `@fee1-dead` (#108801) `@klensy` (#111647)
r? `@compiler-errors`
`@rustbot` label F-c_str_literals beta-nominated
Specialize `try_destructure_mir_constant` for its sole user (pretty printing)
We can't remove the query, as we need to invoke it from rustc_middle, but can only implement it in mir interpretation/const eval.
r? `@RalfJung` for a first round.
While we could move all the logic into pretty printing, that would end up duplicating a bit of code with const eval, which doesn't seem great either.
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #113010 (rust-installer & rls: remove exclusion from rustfmt & tidy )
- #113317 ( -Ztrait-solver=next: stop depending on old solver)
- #113319 (`TypeParameterDefinition` always require a `DefId`)
- #113320 (Add some extra information to opaque type cycle errors)
- #113321 (Move `ty::ConstKind` to `rustc_type_ir`)
- #113337 (Winnow specialized impls during selection in new solver)
- #113355 (Move most coverage code out of `rustc_codegen_ssa`)
- #113356 (Add support for NetBSD/riscv64 aka. riscv64gc-unknown-netbsd.)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Move most coverage code out of `rustc_codegen_ssa`
*This is one step in my larger coverage refactoring ambitions described at <https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/645>.*
The backend implementation of coverage instrumentation was originally split between SSA and LLVM, perhaps in the hopes that it could be used by other backends.
In practice, this split mostly just makes the coverage implementation harder to navigate and harder to modify. It seems unlikely that any backend will actually implement coverage instrumentation in the foreseeable future, especially since many parts of the existing implementation (outside the LLVM backend) are heavily tied to the specific details of LLVM's coverage instrumentation features.
The current shared implementation of `codegen_coverage` is heavily tied to the details of `StatementKind::Coverage`, which makes those details difficult to change. I have reason to want to change those details as part of future fixes/improvements, so this will reduce the amount of interface churn caused by those later changes.
---
This is intended to be a pure refactoring change, with no changes to actual behaviour. All of the “added” code has really just been moved from other files.
Winnow specialized impls during selection in new solver
We need to be able to winnow impls that are specialized by more specific impls in order for codegen to be able to proceed.
r? ``@lcnr``
Move `ty::ConstKind` to `rustc_type_ir`
Needed this in another PR for custom debug impls, and this will also be required to move the new solver into a separate crate that does not use `TyCtxt` so that r-a and friends can depend on the trait solver.
Rebased on top of #113325, only the second and third commits needs reviewing
Add some extra information to opaque type cycle errors
Plus a bunch of cleanups.
This should help users debug query cycles due to auto trait checking. We'll probably want to fix cycle errors in most (or all?) cases by looking at the current item's hidden types (new solver does this), and by delaying the auto trait checks to after typeck.
`TypeParameterDefinition` always require a `DefId`
the `None` case never actually reaches diagnostics so it feels better for diagnostics to be able to rely on the `DefId` being there, cc #113310
