This commit applies rustfmt with rust-lang/rust's default settings to
files in src/libstd/sys *that are not involved in any currently open PR*
to minimize merge conflicts. THe list of files involved in open PRs was
determined by querying GitHub's GraphQL API with this script:
https://gist.github.com/dtolnay/aa9c34993dc051a4f344d1b10e4487e8
With the list of files from the script in outstanding_files, the
relevant commands were:
$ find src/libstd/sys -name '*.rs' \
| xargs rustfmt --edition=2018 --unstable-features --skip-children
$ rg libstd/sys outstanding_files | xargs git checkout --
Repeating this process several months apart should get us coverage of
most of the rest of the files.
To confirm no funny business:
$ git checkout $THIS_COMMIT^
$ git show --pretty= --name-only $THIS_COMMIT \
| xargs rustfmt --edition=2018 --unstable-features --skip-children
$ git diff $THIS_COMMIT # there should be no difference
This allows argv[0] to be overridden on the executable's command-line. This also makes the program
executed independent of argv[0].
Does Fuchsia have the same semantics?
Addresses: #66510
Fuchsia exit codes don't follow the convention of libc::WEXITSTATUS et
al, and they are 64 bits instead of 32 bits. This gives Fuchsia its own
representation of ExitStatus.
Additionally, the zircon syscall structs were out of date, causing us to
see bogus return codes.
* Use size_t where size_t is used, while it's not critical on our
specifically supported architectures, this is more accurate.
* Update HND_SPECIAL_COUNT to the correct value, and give it the size
that enum is likely to be.
The mx_handle_wait_* syscalls in Magenta were renamed to
mx_object_wait. The syscall is used in the Magenta/Fuchsia
implementation of std::process, to wait on child processes.
In addition, this patch enables the use of the system provided
libbacktrace library on Fuchsia targets. Symbolization is not yet
working, but at least it allows printing hex addresses in a backtrace
and makes building succeed when the backtrace feature is not disabled.
This is much nicer for callers who want to short-circuit real I/O errors
with `?`, because they can write this
if let Some(status) = foo.try_wait()? {
...
} else {
...
}
instead of this
match foo.try_wait() {
Ok(status) => {
...
}
Err(err) if err.kind() == io::ErrorKind::WouldBlock => {
...
}
Err(err) => return Err(err),
}
The original design of `try_wait` was patterned after the `Read` and
`Write` traits, which support both blocking and non-blocking
implementations in a single API. But since `try_wait` is never blocking,
it makes sense to optimize for the non-blocking case.
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/38903
