Default sizedness bounds were not being added to
`explicit_super_predicates_of` and `explicit_implied_predicates_of`
which meant that a trait bound added to a associated type projection
would be missing the implied predicate of the default sizedness
supertrait of that trait.
An unexpected consequence of this change was that the check for multiple
principals was now finding an additional `MetaSized` principal when
eagerly expanding trait aliases. Instead of special-casing trait aliases
as different from traits and not adding a `MetaSized` supertrait to trait
aliases, filter out `MetaSized` when lowering `dyn Trait`.
Further tighten up relaxed bounds
Follow-up to rust-lang/rust#142693, rust-lang/rust#135331 and rust-lang/rust#135841.
Fixesrust-lang/rust#143122.
* Reject relaxed bounds `?Trait` in the bounds of trait aliases.
Just like `trait Trait {}` doesn't mean `trait Trait: Sized {}` and we therefore reject `trait Trait: ?Sized {}`, `trait Trait =;` (sic!) doesn't mean `trait Trait = Sized;` (never did!) and as a logical consequence `trait Trait = ?Sized;` is meaningless and should be forbidden.
* Don't permit `?Sized` in more places (e.g., supertrait bounds, trait object types) if feature `more_maybe_bounds` is enabled.
That internal feature is only meant to allow the user to define & use *new* default traits (that have fewer rules to follow for now to ease experimentation).
* Unconditionally check that the `Trait` in `?Trait` is a default trait.
Previously, we would only perform this check in selected places which was very brittle and led to bugs slipping through.
* Slightly improve diagnostics.
Guard HIR lowered contracts with `contract_checks`
Refactor contract HIR lowering to ensure no contract code is executed when contract-checks are disabled.
The call to `contract_checks` is moved to inside the lowered fn body, and contract closures are built conditionally, ensuring no side-effects present in contracts occur when those are disabled. This partially addresses rust-lang/rust#139548, i.e. the bad behavior no longer happens with contract checks disabled (`-Zcontract-checks=no`).
The change is made in preparation for adding contract variable declarations - variables declared before the `requires` assertion, and accessible from both `requires` and `ensures`, but not in the function body (PR rust-lang/rust#144444). As those declarations may also have side-effects, it's good to guard them with `contract_checks` - the new lowering approach allows for this to be done easily.
Contracts tracking issue: rust-lang/rust#128044
**Known limiatations**:
- It is still possible to early return from the *function* from within a contract, e.g.
```rust
#[ensures({if x > 0 { return 0 }; |_| true})]
fn foo(x: u32) -> i32 {
42
}
```
When `foo` is called with an argument greater than 0, instead of `42`, `0` will be returned.
As this is not a regression, it is not addressed in this PR. However, it may be worth revisiting later down the line, as users may expect a form of early return from *contract specifications*, and so returning from the entire *function* could cause confusion.
- ~Contracts are still not optimised out when disabled. Currently, even when contracts are disabled, the code generated causes existing optimisations to fail, meaning even disabled contracts could impact runtime performance. This issue is blocking rust-lang/rust#136578, and has not been addressed in this PR, i.e. the `mir-opt` and `codegen` tests that fail in rust-lang/rust#136578 still fail with these new HIR lowering changes.~ Contracts should now be optimised out when disabled, however some regressions tests still need to be added to be sure that is indeed the case.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#144266 (Supress swapping lhs and rhs in equality suggestion in extern macro )
- rust-lang/rust#147471 (Assert that non-extended temporaries and `super let` bindings have scopes)
- rust-lang/rust#147533 (Renumber return local after state transform)
- rust-lang/rust#147566 (rewrite outlives placeholder constraints to outlives static when handling opaque types)
- rust-lang/rust#147613 (Make logging filters work again by moving EnvFilter into its own layer)
- rust-lang/rust#147615 (reduce calls to attr.span() in old doc attr parsing)
- rust-lang/rust#147636 (miri subtree update)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Assert that non-extended temporaries and `super let` bindings have scopes
This PR clarifies a point of confusion in the compiler: all bodies have an outer temporary drop scope, including `static` and `const` item bodies[^1]. Whenever a temporary should be dropped in its enclosing temporary scope, it should have a temporary scope to be dropped in so that its drop can be scheduled[^2]. As such, I've updated some relevant comments and made `ScopeTree::default_temporary_scope` and `RvalueScopes::temporary_scope` panic when an enclosing temporary scope isn't found instead of allowing potential bugs where potentially-drop-sensitive temporaries are effectively given static lifetimes.
Since non-extended `super let` bindings are dropped in their block's enclosing temporary scope, this applies to them as well: the enclosing temporary scope should exist.
[^1]: See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/check/region.rs#L773-L778 for non-`fn`/closure bodies. The `this.cx.var_parent = None;` enables [lifetime extension to `'static` lifetimes](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/reference/destructors.html#r-destructors.scope.lifetime-extension.static) and the `ScopeData::Destruction` scope ensures non-extended temporaries are dropped in the body expression's scope.
[^2]: For certain borrowed temporaries, drops that don't require running destructors may later be removed by constant promotion. That is unrelated to this PR.
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#147514 (repr_transparent_external_private_fields: normalize types during traversal)
- rust-lang/rust#147605 (Add doc links between `{integer}::from_str_radix` and `from_str`)
- rust-lang/rust#147608 (cg_llvm: Use `LLVMDIBuilderCreateGlobalVariableExpression`)
- rust-lang/rust#147623 (Clear `ChunkedBitSet` without reallocating)
- rust-lang/rust#147625 (Add a warning when running tests with the GCC backend and debug assertions are enabled)
- rust-lang/rust#147626 (Generalize configuring LLD as the default linker in bootstrap)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
repr_transparent_external_private_fields: normalize types during traversal
Determining whether a type is a 1-ZST will internally do full normalization, so we better do the same when scanning for non-exhaustive types.
r? ``@lcnr``
Split overlapping_{inherent,trait}_impls
This yielded some perf improvement for me. Reduces some calls to `impl_trait_header` query. But I think the llvm optimization is more relevant.
The contract_checks compiler flag is now used to determine
if runtime contract checks should be enabled, as opposed
to the compiler intrinsic as previously.
Refactor contract HIR lowering to ensure no contract code is
executed when contract-checks are disabled.
The call to contract_checks is moved to inside the lowered fn
body, and contract closures are built conditionally, ensuring
no side-effects present in contracts occur when those are disabled.
cmse: improve error messages
tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81391
tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/75835
Improves the cmse error messages (e.g. by using more accurate spans), and attempts to clean up the control flow a bit. This is partially in preparation for one final addition: warnings when `union` types or types with niches cross the security boundary. That will be a folllow-up.
Meant to be reviewed commit-by-commit
r? ``@davidtwco``
Prefer to use repeat_n over repeat().take()
More from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/147464, but batch processed with `ast-grep` to find and replace.
second commit add notes for library: affaf532f9
r? ``@RalfJung``
cmse: disallow `impl Trait` in `cmse-nonsecure-entry` return types
tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/75835
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/147242
Refactors some logic to be more robust in the future, and then disallows `impl Trait` as a return type for the cmse ABIs.
The `is_valid_cmse_output_layout` function disallows `union` values like before. That is not entirely correct, but preserves the current behavior. Some additional logic is needed for `union` values (and any types where parts may be uninitialized) that I'll tackle in a later PR.
can be reviewed commit-by-commit.
r? types
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#146593 (Allow specifying multiple bounds for same associated item, except in trait objects)
- rust-lang/rust#147177 ([DebugInfo] Fix MSVC tuple child creation)
- rust-lang/rust#147195 (iter repeat: add tests for new count and last behavior)
- rust-lang/rust#147202 (Swap order of `resolve_coroutine_interiors` and `handle_opaque_type_uses`)
- rust-lang/rust#147204 (Refactor ArrayWindows to use a slice)
- rust-lang/rust#147219 (Add proper error handling for closure in impl)
- rust-lang/rust#147226 (include `outer_inclusive_binder` of pattern types)
- rust-lang/rust#147230 (Fix typo in 'unfulfilled_lint_expectation' to plural)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Rename various "concrete opaque type" things to say "hidden type"
r? lcnr
I've found "concrete opaque type" terminology to be somewhat confusing as in conversation and when explaining opaque type stuff to people I always just talk about things in terms of hidden types. Also the hidden types of opaques are very much not *concrete* in the same sense that a type without any generic parameters is concrete which is an unfortunate overlap in terminology.
I've tried to update comments to also stop referring to things as concrete opaque types but this is mostly best effort as it difficult to find all such cases amongst the massive amounts of uses of "concrete" or "hidden" across the whole compiler.
cmse: fix 'region variables should not be hashed'
tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81391
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131639
Some background: the `cmse-nonsecure-call` calling convention is used for a call from "secure" to "non-secure" code. To make sure that "non-secure" cannot read any secrets, restrictions are put on the signatures of functions with this calling convention: they can only use 4 arguments for passing arguments, and one register for passing a result. No arguments are passed via the stack, and all other registers are cleared before the call.
We check during `hir_ty_lowering` that the signature follows these rules. We do that by determining and then inspecting the layout of the type. That works well overall, but can run into asserts when the type itself is ill-formed. This PR fixes one such case.
I believe that the fix here, just erasing the regions, is the right shape, but there may be some nuance that I'm missing.
r? types
Make replacement suggestion `_` in type verbose
```
error[E0121]: the placeholder `_` is not allowed within types on item signatures for return types
--> $DIR/in-signature.rs:6:21
|
LL | fn arr_fn() -> [u8; _] {
| ^ not allowed in type signatures
|
help: replace with the correct return type
|
LL - fn arr_fn() -> [u8; _] {
LL + fn arr_fn() -> [u8; 3] {
|
```
