Try fast_reject::simplify_type in coherence before doing full check
This is a reattempt at landing #69010 (by `@jonas-schievink).` The change adds a fast path for coherence checking to see if there's no way for types to unify since full coherence checking can be somewhat expensive.
This has big effects on code generated by the [`windows`](https://github.com/microsoft/windows-rs) which in some cases spends as much as 20% of compilation time in the `specialization_graph_of` query. In local benchmarks this took a compilation that previously took ~500 seconds down to ~380 seconds.
This is surely not going to make a difference on much smaller crates, so the question is whether it will have a negative impact. #69010 was closed because some of the perf suite crates did show small regressions.
Additional discussion of this issue is happening [here](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/247081-t-compiler.2Fperformance/topic/windows-rs.20perf).
Move binder for dyn to each list item
This essentially changes `ty::Binder<&'tcx List<ExistentialTraitRef>>` to `&'tcx List<ty::Binder<ExistentialTraitRef>>`.
This is a first step in moving the `dyn Trait` representation closer to Chalk, which we've talked about in `@rust-lang/wg-traits.`
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Create `rustc_type_ir`
Decided to start small 😄
This PR creates a `rustc_type_ir` crate as part of the WG-Traits plan to create a shared type library.
~~There already exists a `rustc_ty` crate, so I named the new crate `rustc_ty_library`. However I think it would make sense to rename the current `rustc_ty` to something else (e.g. `rustc_ty_passes`) to free the name for this new crate.~~
r? `@jackh726`
- Use closure_min_capture maps to capture precise paths
- PlaceBuilder now searches for ancestors in min_capture list
- Add API to `Ty` to allow access to the n-th element in a
tuple in O(1) time.
Co-authored-by: Roxane Fruytier <roxane.fruytier@hotmail.com>
Support repr(simd) on ADTs containing a single array field
This is a squash and rebase of `@gnzlbg's` #63531
I've never actually written code in the compiler before so just fumbled my way around until it would build 😅
I imagine there'll be some work we need to do in `rustc_codegen_cranelift` too for this now, but might need some input from `@bjorn3` to know what that is.
cc `@rust-lang/project-portable-simd`
-----
This PR allows using `#[repr(simd)]` on ADTs containing a single array field:
```rust
#[repr(simd)] struct S0([f32; 4]);
#[repr(simd)] struct S1<const N: usize>([f32; N]);
#[repr(simd)] struct S2<T, const N: usize>([T; N]);
```
This should allow experimenting with portable packed SIMD abstractions on nightly that make use of const generics.
This PR allows using `#[repr(simd)]` on ADTs containing a
single array field:
```rust
#[repr(simd)] struct S0([f32; 4]);
#[repr(simd)] struct S1<const N: usize>([f32; N]);
#[repr(simd)] struct S2<T, const N: usize>([T; N]);
```
This should allow experimenting with portable packed SIMD
abstractions on nightly that make use of const generics.
In particular, this allows us to write more explicit matches that
avoid the pitfalls of using a fully general fall-through case, yet
remain fairly ergonomic. Less logic is in guard cases, more is in
the actual exhaustive case analysis.
No functional changes.
This commit allows us to decide the number of captures required after
completing capture ananysis, which is required as part of implementing
RFC-2229.
Co-authored-by: Aman Arora <me@aman-arora.com>
Co-authored-by: Jenny Wills <wills.jenniferg@gmail.com>
Bounds of the form `type Future: Future<Result=Self::Result>` exist in
some ecosystem crates. To validate these bounds for trait objects we
need to normalize `Self::Result` in a way that doesn't cause a cycle.
lint/ty: move fns to avoid abstraction violation
This PR moves `transparent_newtype_field` and `is_zst` to `LateContext` where they are used, rather than being on the `VariantDef` and `TyS` types, hopefully addressing @eddyb's concern [from this comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/74340#discussion_r456534910).
