This purges uses of uninitialized where possible from test cases. Some
are merely moved over to the equally bad pattern of
MaybeUninit::uninit().assume_init() but with an annotation that this is
"the best we can do".
Require issue = "none" over issue = "0" in unstable attributes
These changes make the use of `issue = "none"` required in unstable attributes throughout the compiler.
Notes:
- #66299 is now in beta so `issue = "none"` is accepted.
- The `tidy` tool now fails on `issue = "0"`.
- Tests that used `issue = "0"` were changed to use `issue = "none"`, except for _one_ that asserts `issue = "0"` can still be used.
- The compiler still allows `issue = "0"` because some submodules require it, this could be disallowed once these are updated.
Resolves#41260
r? @varkor
Refactor type & bounds parsing thoroughly
PR is based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/67131 with first one from this PR being ` extract parse_ty_tuple_or_parens`.
Also fixes#67146.
r? @estebank
Revamp `// run-fail` wrt. `--pass` & support `// build-fail` & `// check-fail`
Revamp how `// run-fail` tests work internally by having a separate `FailMode` that does not interfere with `PassMode`. In particular, `--pass check` will now have no effect on `// *-fail` tests. Moreover, new test annotations `// check-fail` (the default) and `// build-fail` are added. The latter is useful to distinguish post-monomorphization failures from pre-monomorphization failures as seen throughout the PR. Finally, ensure that non-`Ui` tests do not listen to `--pass check` such that the flag can be used with e.g. `./x.py test --pass check` directly.
Fixes#66929.
Fixes#67128.
r? @petrochenkov
cc @RalfJung @ninjasource
Make GATs less ICE-prone.
After this PR simple lifetime-generic associated types can now be used in a compiling program. There are two big limitations:
* #30472 has not been addressed in any way (see src/test/ui/generic-associated-types/iterable.rs)
* Using type- and const-generic associated types errors because bound types and constants aren't handled by trait solving.
* The errors are technically non-fatal, but they happen in a [part of the compiler](4abb0ad273/src/librustc_typeck/lib.rs (L298)) that fairly aggressively stops compiling on errors.
closes#47206closes#49362closes#62521closes#63300closes#64755closes#67089
Test slice patterns more
Adds tests for const evaluation and some more borrow checking tests.
Fixes some bugs in const eval for subslice patterns.
closes#66934
r? @oli-obk
cc @Centril
Fix too restrictive checks on Drop impls
Fixes#34426. Fixes#58311.
This PR completes and extends #59497 (which has been inactive for a while now).
The problem generating both issues was that when checking that the `Predicate`s of the `Drop` impl are exactly the same as the ones of the struct definition, the check was essentially performed by a simple `==` operator, which was not handling correctly HRTBs and involved `Fn` types.
The implemented solution relies on the `relate` machinery to more correctly equate `Predicate`s, and on `anonymize_late_bound_regions` to handle HRTB in a more general way. As the `Relate` trait currently is implemented only for `TraitPredicate` and `ProjectionPredicate` (and as they were the ones generating problems), `relate` is used only for them while for other `Predicate`s the equality check is kept. I'm currently considering whether it would make sense to implement the `Relate` trait also for all other `Predicate`s to render the proposed solution more general.
