When a lazy logical operator (`&&` or `||`) occurs outside of an `if`
condition, it normally doesn't have any associated control-flow branch, so we
don't have an existing way to track whether it was true or false.
This patch adds special code to handle this case, by inserting extra MIR blocks
in a diamond shape after evaluating the RHS. This gives us a place to insert
the appropriate marker statements, which can then be given their own counters.
Add asm goto support to `asm!`
Tracking issue: #119364
This PR implements asm-goto support, using the syntax described in "future possibilities" section of [RFC2873](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2873-inline-asm.html#asm-goto).
Currently I have only implemented the `label` part, not the `fallthrough` part (i.e. fallthrough is implicit). This doesn't reduce the expressive though, since you can use label-break to get arbitrary control flow or simply set a value and rely on jump threading optimisation to get the desired control flow. I can add that later if deemed necessary.
r? ``@Amanieu``
cc ``@ojeda``
This method would previously take a target scope, and then verify that it
was equal to the scope on top of the if-then scope stack.
In practice, this means that callers have to go out of their way to pass around
redundant scope information that's already on the if-then stack.
So it's easier to just retrieve the correct scope directly from the if-then
stack, and simplify the other code that was passing it around.
This makes it easier to see that the call to `in_scope` returns both the then
block and the else block. The rather confusing `unpack!` step is confined to
its own separate line.
(This patch reindents several lines, so using "ignore whitespace" is
recommended in order to focus on the actual changes.)
Most of this method's arguments are usually or always forwarded as-is to
recursive invocations.
Wrapping them in a dedicated struct allows us to document each struct field,
and lets us use struct-update syntax to indicate which arguments are being
modified when making a recursive call.
After desugaring, `let` expressions should only appear inside `if` expressions
or `match` guards, possibly nested within a let-chain. In both cases they are
specifically handled by the lowerings of those expressions, so this case is
currently unreachable.
I have a suspicion that quite a few delayed bug paths are impossible to
reach, so I did an experiment.
I converted every `delayed_bug` to a `bug`, ran the full test suite,
then converted back every `bug` that was hit. A surprising number were
never hit.
The next commit will convert some more back, based on human judgment.
This mostly works well, and eliminates a couple of delayed bugs.
One annoying thing is that we should really also add an
`ErrorGuaranteed` to `proc_macro::bridge::LitKind::Err`. But that's
difficult because `proc_macro` doesn't have access to `ErrorGuaranteed`,
so we have to fake it.
We have `span_delayed_bug` and often pass it a `DUMMY_SP`. This commit
adds `delayed_bug`, which matches pairs like `err`/`span_err` and
`warn`/`span_warn`.
Remove `DiagCtxt` API duplication
`DiagCtxt` defines the internal API for creating and emitting diagnostics: methods like `struct_err`, `struct_span_warn`, `note`, `create_fatal`, `emit_bug`. There are over 50 methods.
Some of these methods are then duplicated across several other types: `Session`, `ParseSess`, `Parser`, `ExtCtxt`, and `MirBorrowckCtxt`. `Session` duplicates the most, though half the ones it does are unused. Each duplicated method just calls forward to the corresponding method in `DiagCtxt`. So this duplication exists to (in the best case) shorten chains like `ecx.tcx.sess.parse_sess.dcx.emit_err()` to `ecx.emit_err()`.
This API duplication is ugly and has been bugging me for a while. And it's inconsistent: there's no real logic about which methods are duplicated, and the use of `#[rustc_lint_diagnostic]` and `#[track_caller]` attributes vary across the duplicates.
This PR removes the duplicated API methods and makes all diagnostic creation and emission go through `DiagCtxt`. It also adds `dcx` getter methods to several types to shorten chains. This approach scales *much* better than API duplication; indeed, the PR adds `dcx()` to numerous types that didn't have API duplication: `TyCtxt`, `LoweringCtxt`, `ConstCx`, `FnCtxt`, `TypeErrCtxt`, `InferCtxt`, `CrateLoader`, `CheckAttrVisitor`, and `Resolver`. These result in a lot of changes from `foo.tcx.sess.emit_err()` to `foo.dcx().emit_err()`. (You could do this with more types, but it gets into diminishing returns territory for types that don't emit many diagnostics.)
After all these changes, some call sites are more verbose, some are less verbose, and many are the same. The total number of lines is reduced, mostly because of the removed API duplication. And consistency is increased, because calls to `emit_err` and friends are always preceded with `.dcx()` or `.dcx`.
r? `@compiler-errors`
- Make temporaries in if-let guards be the same variable in MIR when
the guard is duplicated due to or-patterns.
- Change the "destruction scope" for match arms to be the arm scope rather
than the arm body scope.
- Add tests.
detects redundant imports that can be eliminated.
for #117772 :
In order to facilitate review and modification, split the checking code and
removing redundant imports code into two PR.
rename mir::Constant -> mir::ConstOperand, mir::ConstKind -> mir::Const
Also, be more consistent with the `to/eval_bits` methods... we had some that take a type and some that take a size, and then sometimes the one that takes a type is called `bits_for_ty`.
Turns out that `ty::Const`/`mir::ConstKind` carry their type with them, so we don't need to even pass the type to those `eval_bits` functions at all.
However this is not properly consistent yet: in `ty` we have most of the methods on `ty::Const`, but in `mir` we have them on `mir::ConstKind`. And indeed those two types are the ones that correspond to each other. So `mir::ConstantKind` should actually be renamed to `mir::Const`. But what to do with `mir::Constant`? It carries around a span, that's really more like a constant operand that appears as a MIR operand... it's more suited for `syntax.rs` than `consts.rs`, but the bigger question is, which name should it get if we want to align the `mir` and `ty` types? `ConstOperand`? `ConstOp`? `Literal`? It's not a literal but it has a field called `literal` so it would at least be consistently wrong-ish...
``@oli-obk`` any ideas?
