Commit Graph

1995 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Guillaume Gomez
93ca0af08c Rollup merge of #141603 - nnethercote:reduce-P, r=fee1-dead
Reduce `ast::ptr::P` to a typedef of `Box`

As per the MCP at https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/878.

r? `@fee1-dead`
2025-06-06 23:53:16 +02:00
Josh Stone
af2a85bd75 Ensure stack in Parser::parse_ty
This solve a stack overflow found on Fedora s390x when building
`tests/ui/associated-consts/issue-93775.rs`.
2025-06-04 15:21:30 -07:00
Matthias Krüger
0736a03a78 Rollup merge of #141570 - chenyukang:yukang-fix-eq_unspanned, r=workingjubilee
Fix incorrect eq_unspanned in TokenStream

Fixes rust-lang/rust#141522

r? ``@workingjubilee``

should we remove this function?
since it's used in several places, i'd prefer to keep it.
2025-06-04 16:24:07 +02:00
Matthias Krüger
96531418f8 Rollup merge of #141945 - nnethercote:rm-Path-is_ident, r=compiler-errors
Remove `Path::is_ident`.

It checks that a path has a single segment that matches the given symbol, and that there are zero generic arguments. It has a single use.

We also have `impl PartialEq<Symbol> for Path` which does exactly the same thing *except* it doesn't check for zero generic arguments, which seems like an oversight. It has numerous uses.

This commit removes `Path::is_ident`, adds a test for zero generic arguments to `PartialEq<Symbol> for Path`, and changes the single use of `is_ident` to instead use `==`.

r? `@wesleywiser`
2025-06-03 21:53:38 +02:00
Oli Scherer
5fbdfc3e10 Add iter macro
This adds an `iter!` macro that can be used to create movable
generators.

This also adds a yield_expr feature so the `yield` keyword can be used
within iter! macro bodies. This was needed because several unstable
features each need `yield` expressions, so this allows us to stabilize
them separately from any individual feature.

Co-authored-by: Oli Scherer <github35764891676564198441@oli-obk.de>
Co-authored-by: Jieyou Xu <jieyouxu@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Travis Cross <tc@traviscross.com>
2025-06-03 10:52:32 -07:00
Nicholas Nethercote
04391045d0 Remove Path::is_ident.
It checks that a path has a single segment that matches the given
symbol, and that there are zero generic arguments. It has a single use.

We also have `impl PartialEq<Symbol> for Path` which does exactly the
same thing *except* it doesn't check for zero generic arguments, which
seems like an oversight. It has numerous uses.

This commit removes `Path::is_ident`, adds a test for zero generic
arguments to `PartialEq<Symbol> for Path`, and changes the single use of
`is_ident` to instead use `==`.
2025-06-03 15:21:33 +10:00
Jubilee
5e139db47b Rollup merge of #141077 - chenyukang:yukang-fix-140991-comma, r=wesleywiser
Fix the issue of typo of comma in arm parsing

Fixes #140991

I also checked is it a '/', since it's near from ',' from keyboard.
2025-05-30 13:52:25 -07:00
Jacob Pratt
0ac0285c3f Rollup merge of #141675 - nnethercote:ItemKind-field-order, r=fee1-dead
Reorder `ast::ItemKind::{Struct,Enum,Union}` fields.

So they match the order of the parts in the source code, e.g.:
```
struct Foo<T, U> { t: T, u: U }
       <-><----> <------------>
       /   |       \
   ident generics  variant_data
```

r? `@fee1-dead`
2025-05-29 04:49:43 +02:00
Trevor Gross
d6b1108cda Rollup merge of #141670 - chenyukang:yukang-fix-ice-from-contracts, r=nnethercote
Fix ICE in tokenstream with contracts from parser recovery

Fixes rust-lang/rust#140683

After two times of parsing error, the `recover_stmt_` constructs an error ast, then when we expand macors, the invalid tokenstream triggered ICE because of mismatched delims.

Expected `{` and get other tokens is an obvious error message, too much effort on recovery may introduce noise.

r? ```@nnethercote```
2025-05-28 10:28:11 -04:00
Nicholas Nethercote
4c4a40f6df Reorder ast::ItemKind::{Struct,Enum,Union} fields.
So they match the order of the parts in the source code, e.g.:
```
struct Foo<T, U> { t: T, u: U }
       <-><----> <------------>
       /   |       \
   ident generics  variant_data
```
2025-05-28 15:48:45 +10:00
yukang
adcd0bf5c3 Fix ICE in tokenstream with contracts from parser recovery 2025-05-28 09:35:10 +08:00
Folkert de Vries
c7c0194d98 move asm parsing code into rustc_parse 2025-05-27 09:44:10 +02:00
Nicholas Nethercote
991c91fdaa Reduce P<T> to a typedef of Box<T>.
Keep the `P` constructor function for now, to minimize immediate churn.

All the `into_inner` calls are removed, which is nice.
2025-05-27 13:29:24 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
0f285e346f Remove the one use of P<[T]>.
A `Vec` is fine, the additional word (vector vs. boxed slice) doesn't
matter here.
2025-05-27 02:54:18 +10:00
yukang
d3347bb32b remove eq_unspanned from TokenStream 2025-05-26 17:02:51 +08:00
yukang
5f8954bc41 Fix the issue of typo of comma in arm parsing 2025-05-16 12:40:04 +02:00
Jamie
1267333ef1 Improve ternary operator recovery 2025-05-14 13:32:59 +01:00
Nicholas Nethercote
0984db553d Remove Ident::empty.
All uses have been removed. And it's nonsensical: an identifier by
definition has at least one char.

The commits adds an is-non-empty assertion to `Ident::new` to enforce
this, and converts some `Ident` constructions to use `Ident::new`.
Adding the assertion requires making `Ident::new` and
`Ident::with_dummy_span` non-const, which is no great loss.

The commit amends a couple of places that do path splitting to ensure no
empty identifiers are created.
2025-05-09 13:57:49 +10:00
xizheyin
b922da3586 Use parse_param_general when parsing (T, U)->R in parse_path_segment
Signed-off-by: xizheyin <xizheyin@smail.nju.edu.cn>

Co-authored-by: Vadim Petrochenkov <vadim.petrochenkov@gmail.com>
2025-05-07 22:56:14 +08:00
Matthias Krüger
a477172ced Rollup merge of #140494 - ehuss:document-restrictions, r=traviscross,SparrowLii
Parser: Document restrictions

I had trouble easily understanding what these various flags do. This is my attempt to try to explain what these do.
2025-04-30 22:36:44 +02:00
Vadim Petrochenkov
6668d13de2 ast: Remove token visiting from AST visitor
It's no longer necessary after the removal of nonterminal tokens in #124141.
2025-04-30 10:36:03 +03:00
Eric Huss
2b92f9fb98 Parser: Document restrictions
I had trouble easily understanding what these various flags do. This is
my attempt to try to explain what these do.
2025-04-29 18:05:45 -07:00
Nicholas Nethercote
880e6f716d Use ThinVec to shrink LazyAttrTokenStreamInner. 2025-04-30 07:12:09 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
298c56f4ba Simplify LazyAttrTokenStream.
This commit does the following.
- Changes it from `Lrc<Box<dyn ToAttrTokenStream>>` to
  `Lrc<LazyAttrTokenStreamInner>`.
- Reworks `LazyAttrTokenStreamImpl` as `LazyAttrTokenStreamInner`, which
  is a two-variant enum.
- Removes the `ToAttrTokenStream` trait and the two impls of it.

The recursion limit must be increased in some crates otherwise rustdoc
aborts.
2025-04-30 07:10:56 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
28236ab703 Move various token stream things from rustc_parse to rustc_ast.
Specifically: `TokenCursor`, `TokenTreeCursor`,
`LazyAttrTokenStreamImpl`, `FlatToken`, `make_attr_token_stream`,
`ParserRange`, `NodeRange`. `ParserReplacement`, and `NodeReplacement`.
These are all related to token streams, rather than actual parsing.

This will facilitate the simplifications in the next commit.
2025-04-29 12:14:27 +10:00
Kivooeo
f072d30741 resolved conflict 2025-04-25 17:02:59 +05:00
Matthias Krüger
f45d2bd8ee Rollup merge of #140228 - fmease:revert-overzealous-colon-recovery, r=jieyouxu
Revert overzealous parse recovery for single colons in paths

Basically manually reverts #136808, cc ``@chenyukang`` ``@estebank.``

Reopens #129273.
Fixes [after beta backport] #140227.
2025-04-24 11:40:47 +02:00
León Orell Valerian Liehr
16da97be2f Revert overzealous parse recovery for single colons 2025-04-24 02:57:10 +02:00
bors
553600e0f5 Auto merge of #140180 - ChrisDenton:rollup-5pvs08u, r=ChrisDenton
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #140142 (Some more graphviz tweaks)
 - #140146 (Update `compiler_builtins` to 0.1.156)
 - #140147 (Clean: rename `open_braces` to `open_delimiters` in lexer and move `make_unclosed_delims_error` into `diagnostics.rs`.)
 - #140160 (Use `is_lang_item` and `as_lang_item` instead of handrolling their logic)
 - #140163 (Validate extension in `PathBuf::add_extension`)
 - #140173 (Ping Mara when touching format_args!() internals.)
 - #140175 (`rc""` more clear error message)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2025-04-23 15:12:33 +00:00
Chris Denton
090f6a9629 Rollup merge of #140147 - xizheyin:issue-138401-1, r=compiler-errors
Clean: rename `open_braces` to `open_delimiters` in lexer and move `make_unclosed_delims_error` into `diagnostics.rs`.

Clean code prepared for resolving #138401. To avoid having too many extraneous changes in one PR, I cleaned up some of the naming and method placement in lexer in this PR.
1. For the make_unclosed_delims_error function defined in mod.rs is only used in lexer, so moved into lexer, which enhances encapsulation.
2. For open_braces in TokenTreeDiagInfo the naming is not canonical, as Brace refers to `{...} ` and this variable can store all kinds of different Delimiters. so I named it open_delimiters.

r? `@chenyukang`
2025-04-23 00:43:06 +00:00
Chris Denton
15f8847a25 Rollup merge of #140144 - nnethercote:fix-140098, r=petrochenkov
Handle another negated literal in `eat_token_lit`.

Extends the change from #139653, which was on expressions, to literals.

Fixes #140098.

r? ``@petrochenkov``
2025-04-22 15:24:08 +00:00
bors
8bf5a8d12f Auto merge of #132833 - est31:stabilize_let_chains, r=fee1-dead
Stabilize let chains in the 2024 edition

# Stabilization report

This proposes the stabilization of `let_chains` ([tracking issue], [RFC 2497]) in the [2024 edition] of Rust.

[tracking issue]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/53667
[RFC 2497]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2497
[2024 edition]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/edition-guide/rust-2024/index.html

## What is being stabilized

The ability to `&&`-chain `let` statements inside `if` and `while` is being stabilized, allowing intermixture with boolean expressions. The patterns inside the `let` sub-expressions can be irrefutable or refutable.

```Rust
struct FnCall<'a> {
    fn_name: &'a str,
    args: Vec<i32>,
}

fn is_legal_ident(s: &str) -> bool {
    s.chars()
        .all(|c| ('a'..='z').contains(&c) || ('A'..='Z').contains(&c))
}

impl<'a> FnCall<'a> {
    fn parse(s: &'a str) -> Option<Self> {
        if let Some((fn_name, after_name)) = s.split_once("(")
            && !fn_name.is_empty()
            && is_legal_ident(fn_name)
            && let Some((args_str, "")) = after_name.rsplit_once(")")
        {
            let args = args_str
                .split(',')
                .map(|arg| arg.parse())
                .collect::<Result<Vec<_>, _>>();
            args.ok().map(|args| FnCall { fn_name, args })
        } else {
            None
        }
    }
    fn exec(&self) -> Option<i32> {
        let iter = self.args.iter().copied();
        match self.fn_name {
            "sum" => Some(iter.sum()),
            "max" => iter.max(),
            "min" => iter.min(),
            _ => None,
        }
    }
}

fn main() {
    println!("{:?}", FnCall::parse("sum(1,2,3)").unwrap().exec());
    println!("{:?}", FnCall::parse("max(4,5)").unwrap().exec());
}
```

The feature will only be stabilized for the 2024 edition and future editions. Users of past editions will get an error with a hint to update the edition.

closes #53667

## Why 2024 edition?

Rust generally tries to ship new features to all editions. So even the oldest editions receive the newest features. However, sometimes a feature requires a breaking change so much that offering the feature without the breaking change makes no sense. This occurs rarely, but has happened in the 2018 edition already with `async` and `await` syntax. It required an edition boundary in order for `async`/`await` to become keywords, and the entire feature foots on those keywords.

In the instance of let chains, the issue is the drop order of `if let` chains. If we want `if let` chains to be compatible with `if let`, drop order makes it hard for us to [generate correct MIR]. It would be strange to have different behaviour for `if let ... {}` and `if true && let ... {}`. So it's better to [stay consistent with `if let`].

In edition 2024, [drop order changes] have been introduced to make `if let` temporaries be lived more shortly. These changes also affected `if let` chains. These changes make sense even if you don't take the `if let` chains MIR generation problem into account. But if we want to use them as the solution to the MIR generation problem, we need to restrict let chains to edition 2024 and beyond: for let chains, it's not just a change towards more sensible behaviour, but one required for correct function.

[generate correct MIR]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/104843
[stay consistent with `if let`]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103293#issuecomment-1293408574
[drop order changes]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/124085

## Introduction considerations

As edition 2024 is very new, this stabilization PR only makes it possible to use let chains on 2024 without that feature gate, it doesn't mark that feature gate as stable/removed. I would propose to continue offering the `let_chains` feature (behind a feature gate) for a limited time (maybe 3 months after stabilization?) on older editions to allow nightly users to adopt edition 2024 at their own pace. After that, the feature gate shall be marked as *stabilized*, not removed, and replaced by an error on editions 2021 and below.

## Implementation history

* History from before March 14, 2022 can be found in the [original stabilization PR] that was reverted.
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/94927
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/94951
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/94974
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/95008
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/97295
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/98633
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99731
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/102394
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100526
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100538
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/102998
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103405
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103293
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/107251
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/110568
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/115677
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117743
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117770
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/118191
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/119554
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129394
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/132828
* https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1179
* https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1251
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rustfmt/pull/5910

[original stabilization PR]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/94927

## Adoption history

### In the compiler

* History before March 14, 2022 can be found in the [original stabilization PR].
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/115983
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/116549
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/116688

### Outside of the compiler

* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/11750
* [rspack](https://github.com/web-infra-dev/rspack)
* [risingwave](https://github.com/risingwavelabs/risingwave)
* [dylint](https://github.com/trailofbits/dylint)
* [convex-backend](https://github.com/get-convex/convex-backend)
* [tikv](https://github.com/tikv/tikv)
* [Daft](https://github.com/Eventual-Inc/Daft)
* [greptimedb](https://github.com/GreptimeTeam/greptimedb)

## Tests

<details>

### Intentional restrictions

[`partially-macro-expanded.rs`](4adafcf40a/tests/ui/rfcs/rfc-2294-if-let-guard/partially-macro-expanded.rs), [`macro-expanded.rs`](4adafcf40a/tests/ui/rfcs/rfc-2294-if-let-guard/macro-expanded.rs): it is possible to use macros to expand to both the pattern and the expression inside a let chain, but not to the entire `let pat = expr` operand.
[`parens.rs`](4adafcf40a/tests/ui/rfcs/rfc-2294-if-let-guard/parens.rs): `if (let pat = expr)` is not allowed in chains
[`ensure-that-let-else-does-not-interact-with-let-chains.rs`](4adafcf40a/tests/ui/rfcs/rfc-2497-if-let-chains/ensure-that-let-else-does-not-interact-with-let-chains.rs): `let...else` doesn't support chaining.

### Overlap with match guards

[`move-guard-if-let-chain.rs`](4adafcf40a/tests/ui/rfcs/rfc-2294-if-let-guard/move-guard-if-let-chain.rs): test for the `use moved value` error working well in match guards. could maybe be extended with let chains that have more than one `let`
[`shadowing.rs`](4adafcf40a/tests/ui/rfcs/rfc-2294-if-let-guard/shadowing.rs): shadowing in if let guards works as expected
[`ast-validate-guards.rs`](4adafcf40a/tests/ui/rfcs/rfc-2497-if-let-chains/ast-validate-guards.rs): let chains in match guards require the match guards feature gate

### Simple cases from the early days

PR #88642 has added some tests with very simple usages of `let else`, mostly as regression tests to early bugs.

[`then-else-blocks.rs`](4adafcf40a/tests/ui/rfcs/rfc-2497-if-let-chains/then-else-blocks.rs)
[`ast-lowering-does-not-wrap-let-chains.rs`](4adafcf40a/tests/ui/rfcs/rfc-2497-if-let-chains/ast-lowering-does-not-wrap-let-chains.rs)
[`issue-90722.rs`](4adafcf40a/tests/ui/rfcs/rfc-2497-if-let-chains/issue-90722.rs)
[`issue-92145.rs`](4adafcf40a/tests/ui/rfcs/rfc-2497-if-let-chains/issue-92145.rs)

### Drop order/MIR scoping tests

[`issue-100276.rs`](4adafcf40a/tests/ui/drop/issue-100276.rs): let expressions on RHS aren't terminating scopes
[`drop_order.rs`](4adafcf40a/tests/ui/drop/drop_order.rs): exhaustive temporary drop order test for various Rust constructs, including let chains
[`scope.rs`](4adafcf40a/tests/ui/rfcs/rfc-2294-if-let-guard/scope.rs): match guard scoping test
[`drop-scope.rs`](4adafcf40a/tests/ui/rfcs/rfc-2294-if-let-guard/drop-scope.rs): another match guard scoping test, ensuring that temporaries in if-let guards live for the arm
[`drop_order_if_let_rescope.rs`](4adafcf40a/tests/ui/drop/drop_order_if_let_rescope.rs): if let rescoping on edition 2024, including chains
[`mir_let_chains_drop_order.rs`](4adafcf40a/tests/ui/mir/mir_let_chains_drop_order.rs): comprehensive drop order test for let chains, distinguishes editions 2021 and 2024.
[`issue-99938.rs`](4adafcf40a/tests/ui/rfcs/rfc-2497-if-let-chains/issue-99938.rs), [`issue-99852.rs`](4adafcf40a/tests/ui/mir/issue-99852.rs) both bad MIR ICEs fixed by #102394

### Linting

[`irrefutable-lets.rs`](4adafcf40a/tests/ui/rfcs/rfc-2497-if-let-chains/irrefutable-lets.rs): trailing and leading irrefutable let patterns get linted for, others don't. The lint is turned off for `else if`.
[`issue-121070-let-range.rs`](4adafcf40a/tests/ui/lint/issue-121070-let-range.rs): regression test for false positive of the unused parens lint, precedence requires the `()`s here

### Parser: intentional restrictions

[`disallowed-positions.rs`](2128d8df0e/tests/ui/rfcs/rfc-2497-if-let-chains/disallowed-positions.rs): `let` in expression context is rejected everywhere except at the top level
[`invalid-let-in-a-valid-let-context.rs`](4adafcf40a/tests/ui/rfcs/rfc-2497-if-let-chains/invalid-let-in-a-valid-let-context.rs): nested `let` is not allowed (let's are no legal expressions just because they are allowed in `if` and `while`).

### Parser: recovery

[`issue-103381.rs`](4adafcf40a/tests/ui/parser/issues/issue-103381.rs): Graceful recovery of incorrect chaining of `if` and `if let`
[`semi-in-let-chain.rs`](4adafcf40a/tests/ui/parser/semi-in-let-chain.rs): Ensure that stray `;`s in let chains give nice errors (`if_chain!` users might be accustomed to `;`s)
[`deli-ident-issue-1.rs`](4adafcf40a/tests/ui/parser/deli-ident-issue-1.rs), [`brace-in-let-chain.rs`](4adafcf40a/tests/ui/parser/brace-in-let-chain.rs): Ensure that stray unclosed `{`s in let chains give nice errors and hints

### Misc

[`conflicting_bindings.rs`](4adafcf40a/tests/ui/pattern/usefulness/conflicting_bindings.rs): the conflicting bindings check also works in let chains. Personally, I'd extend it to chains with multiple let's as well.
[`let-chains-attr.rs`](4adafcf40a/tests/ui/expr/if/attrs/let-chains-attr.rs): attributes work on let chains

### Tangential tests with `#![feature(let_chains)]`

[`if-let.rs`](4adafcf40a/tests/coverage/branch/if-let.rs): MC/DC coverage tests for let chains
[`logical_or_in_conditional.rs`](4adafcf40a/tests/mir-opt/building/logical_or_in_conditional.rs): not really about let chains, more about dropping/scoping behaviour of `||`
[`stringify.rs`](4adafcf40a/tests/ui/macros/stringify.rs): exhaustive test of the `stringify` macro
[`expanded-interpolation.rs`](4adafcf40a/tests/ui/unpretty/expanded-interpolation.rs), [`expanded-exhaustive.rs`](4adafcf40a/tests/ui/unpretty/expanded-exhaustive.rs): Exhaustive test of `-Zunpretty`
[`diverges-not.rs`](4adafcf40a/tests/ui/rfcs/rfc-0000-never_patterns/diverges-not.rs): Never type, mostly tangential to let chains

</details>

## Possible future work

* There is proposals to allow `if let Pat(bindings) = expr {}` to be written as `if expr is Pat(bindings) {}` ([RFC 3573]). `if let` chains are a natural extension of the already existing `if let` syntax, and I'd argue orthogonal towards `is` syntax.
  * https://github.com/rust-lang/lang-team/issues/297
* One could have similar chaining inside `let ... else` statements. There is no proposed RFC for this however, nor is it implemented on nightly.
* Match guards have the `if` keyword as well, but on stable Rust, they don't support `let`. The functionality is available via an unstable feature ([`if_let_guard` tracking issue]). Stabilization of let chains affects this feature in so far as match guards containing let chains now only need the `if_let_guard` feature gate be present instead of also the `let_chains` feature (NOTE: this PR doesn't implement this simplification, it's left for future work).

[RFC 3573]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3573
[`if_let_guard` tracking issue]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/51114

## Open questions / blockers

- [ ] bad recovery if you don't put a `let` (I don't think this is a blocker): [#117977](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/117977)
- [x] An instance where a temporary lives shorter than with nested ifs, breaking compilation: [#103476](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/103476). Personally I don't think this is a blocker either, as it's an edge case. Edit: turns out to not reproduce in edition 2025 any more, due to let rescoping. regression test added in #133093
- [x] One should probably extend the tests for `move-guard-if-let-chain.rs` and `conflicting_bindings.rs` to have chains with multiple let's: done in 133093
- [x] Parsing rejection tests: addressed by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/132828
- [x] [Style](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/346005-t-style/topic/let.20chains.20stabilization.20and.20formatting): https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/139456
- [x] https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/86730 explicitly mentions `let_else`. I think we can live with `let pat = expr` not evaluating as `expr` for macro_rules macros, especially given that `let pat = expr` is not a legal expression anywhere except inside `if` and `while`.
- [x] Documentation in the reference: https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1740
- [x] Add chapter to the Rust 2024 [edition guide]: https://github.com/rust-lang/edition-guide/pull/337
- [x] Resolve open questions on desired drop order.

[original reference PR]: https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1179
[edition guide]: https://github.com/rust-lang/edition-guide
2025-04-22 07:54:10 +00:00
xizheyin
e827b17ddb Move make_unclosed_delims_error to lexer/diagonostics.rs
Signed-off-by: xizheyin <xizheyin@smail.nju.edu.cn>
2025-04-22 14:37:26 +08:00
Nicholas Nethercote
6be270be0c Handle another negated literal in eat_token_lit.
Extends the change from #139653, which was on expressions, to literals.

Fixes #140098.
2025-04-22 15:08:32 +10:00
bors
fae7785b60 Auto merge of #139897 - nnethercote:rm-OpenDelim-CloseDelim, r=petrochenkov
Remove `token::{Open,Close}Delim`

By replacing them with `{Open,Close}{Param,Brace,Bracket,Invisible}`.

PR #137902 made `ast::TokenKind` more like `lexer::TokenKind` by
replacing the compound `BinOp{,Eq}(BinOpToken)` variants with fieldless
variants `Plus`, `Minus`, `Star`, etc. This commit does a similar thing
with delimiters. It also makes `ast::TokenKind` more similar to
`parser::TokenType`.

This requires a few new methods:
- `TokenKind::is_{,open_,close_}delim()` replace various kinds of
  pattern matches.
- `Delimiter::as_{open,close}_token_kind` are used to convert
  `Delimiter` values to `TokenKind`.

Despite these additions, it's a net reduction in lines of code. This is
because e.g. `token::OpenParen` is so much shorter than
`token::OpenDelim(Delimiter::Parenthesis)` that many multi-line forms
reduce to single line forms. And many places where the number of lines
doesn't change are still easier to read, just because the names are
shorter, e.g.:
```
-   } else if self.token != token::CloseDelim(Delimiter::Brace) {
+   } else if self.token != token::CloseBrace {
```

r? `@petrochenkov`
2025-04-22 01:15:06 +00:00
Nicholas Nethercote
bf8ce32558 Remove token::{Open,Close}Delim.
By replacing them with `{Open,Close}{Param,Brace,Bracket,Invisible}`.

PR #137902 made `ast::TokenKind` more like `lexer::TokenKind` by
replacing the compound `BinOp{,Eq}(BinOpToken)` variants with fieldless
variants `Plus`, `Minus`, `Star`, etc. This commit does a similar thing
with delimiters. It also makes `ast::TokenKind` more similar to
`parser::TokenType`.

This requires a few new methods:
- `TokenKind::is_{,open_,close_}delim()` replace various kinds of
  pattern matches.
- `Delimiter::as_{open,close}_token_kind` are used to convert
  `Delimiter` values to `TokenKind`.

Despite these additions, it's a net reduction in lines of code. This is
because e.g. `token::OpenParen` is so much shorter than
`token::OpenDelim(Delimiter::Parenthesis)` that many multi-line forms
reduce to single line forms. And many places where the number of lines
doesn't change are still easier to read, just because the names are
shorter, e.g.:
```
-   } else if self.token != token::CloseDelim(Delimiter::Brace) {
+   } else if self.token != token::CloseBrace {
```
2025-04-21 07:35:56 +10:00
est31
5258cb76a5 Don't call ungate_last 2025-04-20 23:14:55 +02:00
Chris Denton
db98b72e34 Rollup merge of #137454 - mu001999-contrib:fix-137414, r=wesleywiser
not lint break with label and unsafe block

fixes #137414

we can't label unsafe blocks, so that we can do not lint them
2025-04-19 14:01:36 +00:00
est31
d75f8cde2f Also allow let chains in match guards 2025-04-18 15:57:29 +02:00
est31
2e61af2fca Stabilize let chains on edition 2024 2025-04-18 14:21:14 +02:00
bors
15c4ccef03 Auto merge of #139940 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-rd4d3fn, r=matthiaskrgr
Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #135340 (Add `explicit_extern_abis` Feature and Enforce Explicit ABIs)
 - #139440 (rustc_target: RISC-V: feature addition batch 2)
 - #139667 (cfi: Remove #[no_sanitize(cfi)] for extern weak functions)
 - #139828 (Don't require rigid alias's trait to hold)
 - #139854 (Improve parse errors for stray lifetimes in type position)
 - #139889 (Clean UI tests 3 of n)
 - #139894 (Fix `opt-dist` CLI flag and make it work without LLD)
 - #139900 (stepping into impls for normalization is unproductive)
 - #139915 (replace some #[rustc_intrinsic] usage with use of the libcore declarations)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2025-04-17 04:52:34 +00:00
Matthias Krüger
7ab385e2e1 Rollup merge of #139854 - fmease:modern-diag-for-lt-in-ty, r=davidtwco
Improve parse errors for stray lifetimes in type position

While technically & syntactically speaking lifetimes do begin[^1] types in type contexts (this essentially excludes generic argument lists) and require a following `+` to form a complete type (`'a +` denotes a bare trait object type), the likelihood that a user meant to write a lifetime-prefixed bare trait object type in *modern* editions (Rust ≥2021) when placing a lifetime into a type context is incredibly low (they would need to add at least three tokens to turn it into a *semantically* well-formed TOT: `'a` → `dyn 'a + Trait`).

Therefore let's *lie* in modern editions (just like in PR https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/131239, a precedent if you will) by stating "*expected type, found lifetime*" in such cases which is a lot more a approachable, digestible and friendly compared to "*lifetime in trait object type must be followed by `+`*" (as added in PR https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/69760).

I've also added recovery for "ampersand-less" reference types (e.g., `'a ()`, `'a mut Ty`) in modern editions because it was trivial to do and I think it's not unlikely to occur in practice.

Fixes #133413.

[^1]: For example, in the context of decl macros, this implies that a lone `'a` always matches syntax fragment `ty` ("even if" there's a later macro matcher expecting syntax fragment `lifetime`). Rephrased, lifetimes (in type contexts) *commit* to the type parser.
2025-04-17 00:16:22 +02:00
Zalathar
4d6ae78fa2 Remove old diagnostic notes for type ascription syntax
Type ascription syntax was removed in 2023.
2025-04-16 20:24:55 +10:00
León Orell Valerian Liehr
6242335fdb Improve diagnostic for E0178 (bad + in type)
Namely, use a more sensical primary span.
Don't pretty-print AST nodes for the diagnostic message. Why:
* It's lossy (e.g., it doesn't replicate trailing `+`s in trait objects.
* It's prone to leak error nodes (printed as `(/*ERROR*/)`) since
  the LHS can easily represent recovered code (e.g., `fn(i32?) + T`).
2025-04-15 10:08:49 +02:00
León Orell Valerian Liehr
8887af72a0 Improve parse errors for lifetimes in type position 2025-04-15 10:08:36 +02:00
Matthias Krüger
bf49dfc943 Rollup merge of #139392 - compiler-errors:raw-expr, r=oli-obk
Detect and provide suggestion for `&raw EXPR`

When emitting an error in the parser, and we detect that the previous token was `raw` and we *could* have consumed `const`/`mut`, suggest that this may have been a mistyped raw ref expr. To do this, we add `const`/`mut` to the expected token set when parsing `&raw` as an expression (which does not affect the "good path" of parsing, for the record).

This is kind of a rudimentary error improvement, since it doesn't actually attempt to recover anything, leading to some other knock-on errors b/c we still treat `&raw` as the expression that was parsed... but at least we add the suggestion! I don't think the parser grammar means we can faithfully recover `&raw EXPR` early, i.e. during `parse_expr_borrow`.

Fixes #133231
2025-04-14 18:15:31 +02:00
bors
f836ae4e66 Auto merge of #124141 - nnethercote:rm-Nonterminal-and-TokenKind-Interpolated, r=petrochenkov
Remove `Nonterminal` and `TokenKind::Interpolated`

A third attempt at this; the first attempt was #96724 and the second was #114647.

r? `@ghost`
2025-04-14 03:56:55 +00:00
Jacob Pratt
2f873f96e2 Rollup merge of #139653 - nnethercote:fix-139495, r=petrochenkov
Handle a negated literal in `eat_token_lit`.

Fixes #139495.

r? `@petrochenkov`
2025-04-11 21:21:01 +02:00
Nicholas Nethercote
d25c8a8ade Handle a negated literal in eat_token_lit.
Fixes #139495.
2025-04-11 10:57:36 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
7ae5c7f32d Avoid an empty trait name in impl blocks.
`resolve_ident_in_lexical_scope` checks for an empty name. Why is this
necessary? Because `parse_item_impl` can produce an `impl` block with an
empty trait name in some cases. This is pretty gross and very
non-obvious.

This commit avoids the use of the empty trait name. In one case the
trait name is instead pulled from `TyKind::ImplTrait`, which prevents
the output for `tests/ui/impl-trait/extra-impl-in-trait-impl.rs` from
changing. In the other case we just fail the parse and don't try to
recover. I think losing error recovery in this obscure case is worth
the code cleanup.

This change affects `tests/ui/parser/impl-parsing.rs`, which is split in
two, and the obsolete `..` syntax cases are removed (they are tested
elsewhere).
2025-04-09 15:01:14 +10:00