Revert stabilization of `#![feature(target_feature_11)]`
This reverts #99767 due to the presence of bugs #108645 and #108646.
cc `@joshtriplett`
cc tracking issue #69098
r? `@ghost`
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #108516 (Restrict `#[rustc_box]` to `Box::new` calls)
- #108575 (Erase **all** regions when probing for associated types on ambiguity in astconv)
- #108585 (Run compiler test suite in parallel on Fuchsia)
- #108606 (Add test case for mismatched open/close delims)
- #108609 (Highlight whole expression for E0599)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Highlight whole expression for E0599
Fixes#108603
This adds a secondary label to highlight the whole expression leading to the error. It also prevents empty labels being recognised as 'unexpected' by compiletest - otherwise, tests with NOTE annotations would pick up empty labels.
`@rustbot` label +A-diagnostics
Restrict `#[rustc_box]` to `Box::new` calls
Currently, `#[rustc_box]` can be applied to any call expression with a single argument. This PR only allows it to be applied to calls to `Box::new`
Add support for QNX Neutrino to standard library
This change:
- adds standard library support for QNX Neutrino (7.1).
- upgrades `libc` to version `0.2.139` which supports QNX Neutrino
`@gh-tr`
⚠️ Backtraces on QNX require https://github.com/rust-lang/backtrace-rs/pull/507 which is not yet merged! (But everything else works without these changes) ⚠️
Tested mainly with a x86_64 virtual machine (see qnx-nto.md) and partially with an aarch64 hardware (some tests fail due to constrained resources).
Merge two different equality specialization traits in `core`
Arrays and slices each had their own version of this, without a matching set of `impl`s.
Merge them into one (still-`pub(crate)`) `cmp::BytewiseEq` trait, so we can stop doing all these things twice.
And that means that the `[T]::eq` → `memcmp` specialization picks up a bunch of types where that previously only worked for arrays, so examples like <https://rust.godbolt.org/z/KjsG8MGGT> will use it now instead of emitting loops.
r? the8472
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #108143 (rustdoc: search by macro when query ends with `!`)
- #108394 (Make `x doc --open` work on every book)
- #108427 (Recover from for-else and while-else)
- #108462 (Fix `VecDeque::append` capacity overflow for ZSTs)
- #108568 (Make associated_item_def_ids for traits use an unstable option to also return associated types for RPITITs)
- #108604 (Add regression test for #107280)
- #108605 (Add regression test for #105821)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Recover from for-else and while-else
This recovers from attempts at writing for-else or while-else loops, which might help users coming from e.g. Python.
```rs
for _ in 0..0 {
// ...
} else {
// ...
}
```
Combined with trying to store it in a let binding, the current diagnostic can be a bit confusing. It mentions let-else and suggests wrapping the loop in parentheses, which the user probably doesn't want. let-else doesn't make sense for `for` and `while` loops, as they are of type `()` (which already is an irrefutable pattern and doesn't need let-else).
<details>
<summary>Current diagnostic</summary>
```rs
error: right curly brace `}` before `else` in a `let...else` statement not allowed
--> src/main.rs:4:5
|
4 | } else {
| ^
|
help: wrap the expression in parentheses
|
2 ~ let _x = (for _ in 0..0 {
3 |
4 ~ }) else {
|
```
</details>
Some questions:
- Can the wording for the error message be improved? Would "for...else loops are not allowed" fit better?
- Should we be more "conservative" in case we want to support this in the future (i.e. say "for...else loops are **currently** not allowed/supported")?
- Is there a better way than storing a `&'static str` for the loop type? It is used for substituting the placeholder in the locale file (since it can emit either `for...else` or `while...else`). Maybe there is an enum I could use that I couldn't find
Name LLVM anonymous constants by a hash of their contents
This makes the names stable between different versions of a crate unlike the `AllocId` naming, making LLVM IR comparisons with `llvm-diff` more practical.
Add `Option::as_`(`mut_`)`slice`
This adds the following functions:
* `Option<T>::as_slice(&self) -> &[T]`
* `Option<T>::as_mut_slice(&mut self) -> &[T]`
The `as_slice` and `as_mut_slice_mut` functions benefit from an optimization that makes them completely branch-free. ~~Unfortunately, this optimization is not available on by-value Options, therefore the `into_slice` implementations use the plain `match` + `slice::from_ref` approach.~~
Note that the optimization's soundness hinges on the fact that either the niche optimization makes the offset of the `Some(_)` contents zero or the mempory layout of `Option<T>` is equal to that of `Option<MaybeUninit<T>>`.
The idea has been discussed on [Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/219381-t-libs/topic/Option.3A.3Aas_slice). Notably the idea for the `as_slice_mut` and `into_slice´ methods came from `@cuviper` and `@Sp00ph` hardened the optimization against niche-optimized Options.
The [rust playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=release&edition=2021&gist=74f8e4239a19f454c183aaf7b4a969e0) shows that the generated assembly of the optimized method is basically only a copy while the naive method generates code containing a `test dx, dx` on x86_64.
---
EDIT from reviewer: ACP is https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/150
Only look for param in item's generics if it actually comes from generics
Record whether a `hir::GenericParam` comes from an item's generics, or from a `for<...>` binder. Then, only look for the param in `object_lifetime_default` if it actually comes from the item's generics.
Fixes#108177
This adds the following functions:
* `Option<T>::as_slice(&self) -> &[T]`
* `Option<T>::as_slice_mut(&mut self) -> &[T]`
The `as_slice` and `as_slice_mut` functions benefit from an
optimization that makes them completely branch-free.
Note that the optimization's soundness hinges on the fact that either
the niche optimization makes the offset of the `Some(_)` contents zero
or the mempory layout of `Option<T>` is equal to that of
`Option<MaybeUninit<T>>`.
