Always suggest as `MachineApplicable` in `recover_intersection_pat`
This resolves one FIXME in `recover_intersection_pat` by always applying `MachineApplicable` when suggesting, as `bindings_after_at` is now stable.
This also separates a test to apply `// run-rustfix`.
Signed-off-by: Yuki Okushi <jtitor@2k36.org>
Rollup of 4 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #105515 (Account for macros in const generics)
- #106146 (Readme: update section on how to run `x.py`)
- #106150 (Detect when method call on LHS might be shadowed)
- #106174 (Remove unused empty CSS rules in ayu theme)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Fix incorrect span when using byte-escaped rbrace
Fix#103826, a format args span issue introduced in #102214.
The current solution for tracking skipped characters made it so that certain situations were ambiguous enough that the original span couldn't be worked out later. This PR improves on the original solution by keeping track of groups of skipped characters using a map, and fixes the previous bug. See an example of this ambiguity in the [previous PR's discussion](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/102214#issuecomment-1258711015).
Don't perform invalid checks in `codegen_attrs`
The attributes `#[track_caller]` and `#[cmse_nonsecure_entry]` are only valid on functions. When validating one of these attributes, codegen_attrs previously called `fn_sig`, [which can only be used on functions](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/105201), on the item the attribute was attached to, assuming that the item was a function without checking. This led to [ICEs in situations where the attribute was incorrectly used on non-functions](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/105594).
With this change, we skip calling `fn_sig` if the item the attribute is attached to must be a function but isn't, because `check_attr` will reject such cases without codegen_attrs's intervention.
As a side note, some of the attributes in codegen_attrs are only valid on functions, but that property isn't actually checked. I'm planning to fix that in a follow up PR since it's a behavior change that will need to be validated rather than an obvious bugfix. Thankfully, all the attributes like that I've found so far are unstable.
Fixes#105594.
r? `@cjgillot`
