Improve wording of "cannot multiply" type error
For example, if you had this code:
fn foo(x: i32, y: f32) -> f32 {
x * y
}
You would get this error:
error[E0277]: cannot multiply `f32` to `i32`
--> src/lib.rs:2:7
|
2 | x * y
| ^ no implementation for `i32 * f32`
|
= help: the trait `Mul<f32>` is not implemented for `i32`
However, that's not usually how people describe multiplication. People
usually describe multiplication like how the division error words it:
error[E0277]: cannot divide `i32` by `f32`
--> src/lib.rs:2:7
|
2 | x / y
| ^ no implementation for `i32 / f32`
|
= help: the trait `Div<f32>` is not implemented for `i32`
So that's what this change does. It changes this:
error[E0277]: cannot multiply `f32` to `i32`
--> src/lib.rs:2:7
|
2 | x * y
| ^ no implementation for `i32 * f32`
|
= help: the trait `Mul<f32>` is not implemented for `i32`
To this:
error[E0277]: cannot multiply `i32` by `f32`
--> src/lib.rs:2:7
|
2 | x * y
| ^ no implementation for `i32 * f32`
|
= help: the trait `Mul<f32>` is not implemented for `i32`
The optimization introduces additional uses of the discriminant operand, but
does not ensure that it is still valid to evaluate it or that it still
evaluates to the same value.
Evaluate it once at original position, and store the result in a new temporary.
Drop unneeded `mut`
These parameters don't get modified.
Note that `trailing_comment` is pub and gets exported from `rustc_ast_pretty`. Is that considered to be a stable API? If yes, and you want to reserve the right to modify `self` in `trailing_comment` in the future, that hunk would need to be dropped.
Don't update `entries` in `TypedArena` if T does not need drop
As far as I can tell, `entries` is only used when dropping `TypedArenaChunk`s and their contents. It is already ignored there, if T is not `mem::needs_drop`, this PR just skips updating it's value.
You can see `TypedArenaChunk` ignoring the entry count in L71. The reasoning is similar to what you can find in `DroplessArena`.
r? @oli-obk
Improve `skip_binder` usage during FlagComputation
It looks like there was previously a bug around `ExistentialPredicate::Projection` here, don't know how to best trigger that one to add a regression test though.
Trait predicate ambiguities are not always in `Self`
When reporting ambiguities in trait predicates, the compiler incorrectly assumed the ambiguity was always in the type the trait should be implemented on, and never the generic parameters of the trait. This caused silly suggestions for predicates like `<KnownType as Trait<_>>`, such as giving explicit types to completely unrelated variables that happened to be of type `KnownType`.
This also reverts #73027, which worked around this issue in some cases and does not appear to be necessary any more.
fixes#77982fixes#78055
This optimization can result in unsoundness, because it introduces
additional uses of a place holding the discriminant value without
ensuring that it is valid to do so.
