Validate use of parameters in naked functions
* Reject use of parameters inside naked function body.
* Reject use of patterns inside function parameters, to emphasize role
of parameters a signature declaration (mirroring existing behaviour
for function declarations) and avoid generating code introducing
specified bindings.
Closes issues below by considering input to be ill-formed.
Closes#75922.
Closes#77848.
Closes#79350.
Always invoke statement attributes on the statement itself
This is preparation for PR #78296, which will require us to handle
statement items in addition to normal items.
Added lint str_to_string
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog: un-deprecate [`str_to_string`] and [`string_to_string`] and introduce them as `restriction` lints again.
Fixes#5610
Added new lint:- str_to_string
r? `@flip1995`
When using the unstable `--persist-doctests` option,
Windows path separators were not escaped properly. Also when running
the command in a workspace, crate files can overwrite each other.
Before: `src\lib_rs_1_0\rust_out`
After: `\crate_a_src_lib_rs_1_0\rust_out`, `\crate_b_src_lib_rs_1_0\rust_out`
Add `summary_opts()` for Markdown summary rendering options
We have a similar function `opts()` that is for rendering the main body
of the documentation, but until now we just constructed the options for
rendering summaries on the fly. This is a problem if/when we change the
enabled options since the different places can get out-of-sync.
Add support for minimum supported rust version
add configuration option for minimum supported rust version
add msrv attribute to some lints listed in #6097
add tests
addresses #6097
changelog: Add `msrv` configuration to Clippy. This should get a longer changelog entry.
Rename `optin_builtin_traits` to `auto_traits`
They were originally called "opt-in, built-in traits" (OIBITs), but
people realized that the name was too confusing and a mouthful, and so
they were renamed to just "auto traits". The feature flag's name wasn't
updated, though, so that's what this PR does.
There are some other spots in the compiler that still refer to OIBITs,
but I don't think changing those now is worth it since they are internal
and not particularly relevant to this PR.
Also see <https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/opt-in.2C.20built-in.20traits.20(auto.20traits).20feature.20name>.
r? `@oli-obk` (feel free to re-assign if you're not the right reviewer for this)
Rename `optin_builtin_traits` to `auto_traits`
They were originally called "opt-in, built-in traits" (OIBITs), but
people realized that the name was too confusing and a mouthful, and so
they were renamed to just "auto traits". The feature flag's name wasn't
updated, though, so that's what this PR does.
There are some other spots in the compiler that still refer to OIBITs,
but I don't think changing those now is worth it since they are internal
and not particularly relevant to this PR.
Also see <https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/opt-in.2C.20built-in.20traits.20(auto.20traits).20feature.20name>.
r? `@oli-obk` (feel free to re-assign if you're not the right reviewer for this)
Proposal to add Peekable::peek_mut
A "peekable" iterator has a `peek()`-method which provides an immutable reference to the next item. We currently do not have a method to modify that item, which we could easily add via a `peek_mut()`. See the test for a use-case (alike to my original use case), where a "pristine" iterator is passed on after modifying its state via `peek_mut()`.
If there is interest in this, I can expand on the tests and docs.
We have a similar function `opts()` that is for rendering the main body
of the documentation, but until now we just constructed the options for
rendering summaries on the fly. This is a problem if/when we change the
enabled options since the different places can get out-of-sync.
Document unsafety in core::slice::memchr
Contributes to #66219
Note sure if that's good enough, especially for the `align_to` call.
The docs only mention transmuting and I don't think that everything related to reference lifetimes and state validity mentioned in the [nomicon](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nomicon/transmutes.html) are relevant here.
