Generating a call to `as_mut()` let to more restrictive borrows than
what reborrowing usually gives us. Instead, we change the desugaring to
reborrow the pin internals directly which makes things more expressive.
Bindgen allows generating `#[non_exhaustive] #[repr(u32)]` enums.
This results in nonintuitive nonlocal `improper_ctypes` warnings,
even when the types are otherwise perfectly valid in C.
Adjust for actual tooling expectations by avoiding warning on
simple enums with only unit variants.
Never patterns constitute a read for unsafety
This code is otherwise unsound if we don't emit an unsafety error here. Noticed when fixing #130528, but it's totally unrelated.
r? `@Nadrieril`
Check params for unsafety in THIR
Self-explanatory. I'm not surprised this was overlooked, given the way that THIR visitors work. Perhaps we should provide a better entrypoint.
Fixes#130528
Further improve diagnostics for expressions in pattern position
Follow-up of #118625, see #121697.
```rs
fn main() {
match 'b' {
y.0.0.1.z().f()? as u32 => {},
}
}
```
Before:
```
error: expected one of `=>`, ``@`,` `if`, or `|`, found `.`
--> src/main.rs:3:10
|
3 | y.0.0.1.z().f()? as u32 => {},
| ^ expected one of `=>`, ``@`,` `if`, or `|`
```
After:
```
error: expected a pattern, found an expression
--> src/main.rs:3:9
|
3 | y.0.0.1.z().f()? as u32 => {},
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ arbitrary expressions are not allowed in patterns
|
help: consider moving the expression to a match arm guard
|
3 | val if val == y.0.0.1.z().f()? as u32 => {},
| ~~~ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
help: consider extracting the expression into a `const`
|
2 + const VAL: /* Type */ = y.0.0.1.z().f()? as u32;
3 ~ match 'b' {
4 ~ VAL => {},
|
help: consider wrapping the expression in an inline `const` (requires `#![feature(inline_const_pat)]`)
|
3 | const { y.0.0.1.z().f()? as u32 } => {},
| +++++++ +
```
---
r? fmease
`@rustbot` label +A-diagnostics +A-parser +A-patterns +C-enhancement
Update the minimum external LLVM to 18
With this change, we'll have stable support for LLVM 18 and 19.
For reference, the previous increase to LLVM 17 was #122649.
cc `@rust-lang/wg-llvm`
r? nikic
Reduce confusion about `make_indirect_byval` by renaming it
As part of doing so, remove the incorrect handling of the wasm target's `make_indirect_byval` (i.e. using it at all).
Gate `repr(Rust)` correctly on non-ADT items
#114201 added `repr(Rust)` but didn't add any attribute validation to it like `repr(C)` has, to only allow it on ADT items.
I consider this code to be nonsense, for example:
```
#[repr(Rust)]
fn foo() {}
```
Reminder that it's different from `extern "Rust"`, which *is* valid on function items. But also this now disallows `repr(Rust)` on modules, impls, traits, etc.
I'll crater it, if it looks bad then I'll add an FCW.
---
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/relnotes: Compatibility (minor breaking change).
Do not ICE with incorrect empty suggestion
When we have two types with the same name, one without type parameters and the other with type parameters and a derive macro, we were before incorrectly suggesting to remove type parameters from the former, which ICEd because we were suggesting to remove nothing. We now gate against this.
The output is still not perfect. E0107 should explicitly detect this case and provide better context, but for now let's avoid the ICE.
Fix#108748.
This commit adds basic support for reborrowing `Pin` types in argument
position. At the moment it only supports reborrowing `Pin<&mut T>` as
`Pin<&mut T>` by inserting a call to `Pin::as_mut()`, and only in
argument position (not as the receiver in a method call).
When we have two types with the same name, one without type parameters and the other with type parameters and a derive macro, we were before incorrectly suggesting to remove type parameters from the former, which ICEd because we were suggesting to remove nothing. We now gate against this.
The output is still not perfect. E0107 should explicitly detect this case and provide better context, but for now let's avoid the ICE.
Improve handling of raw-idents in check-cfg
This PR improves the handling of raw-idents in the check-cfg diagnostics.
In particular the list of expected names and the suggestion now correctly take into account the "keyword-ness" of the ident, and correctly prefix the ident with `r#` when necessary.
`@rustbot` labels +F-check-cfg
Rollup of 3 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #130466 (tests: add repr/transparent test for aarch64)
- #130468 (Make sure that def id <=> lang item map is bidirectional)
- #130499 (Add myself to the libs review rotation)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
tests: add repr/transparent test for aarch64
Fixes#74396.
Moves `transparent-struct-ptr.rs` to `transparent-byval-struct-ptr.rs` and then adds a new `transparent-opaque-ptr.rs` for aarch64.
Fix circular fn_sig queries to correct number of args for methods
Fixes#130400. This was a [debug assert](28e8f01c2a/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/fn_ctxt/checks.rs (L2557)) added to some argument error reporting code in #129320 which verified that the number of params (from the HIR) matched the `matched_inputs` which ultimately come from ty::FnSig. In the reduced test case:
```
fn foo(&mut self) -> _ {
foo()
}
```
There is a circular dependency computing the ty::FnSig -- when trying to compute it, we try to figure out the return value, which again depends on this ty::FnSig. In #105162, this was supported by short-circuiting the cycle by synthesizing a FnSig with error types for parameters. The [code in question](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/105162/files#diff-a65feec6bfffb19fbdc60a80becd1030c82a56c16b177182cd277478fdb04592R44) computes the number of parameters by taking the number of parameters from the hir::FnDecl and adding 1 if there is an implicit self parameter.
I might be missing a subtlety here, but AFAICT the adjustment for implicit self args is unnecessary and results in one too many args. For example, for this non-errorful code:
```
trait Foo {
fn bar(&self) {}
}
```
The resulting hir::FnDecl and ty::FnSig both have the same number of inputs -- 1. So, this PR removes that adjustment and adds a test for the debug ICE.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Implement a Method to Seal `DiagInner`'s Suggestions
This PR adds a method on `DiagInner` called `.seal_suggestions()` to prevent new suggestions from being added while preserving existing suggestions.
This is useful because currently there is no way to prevent new suggestions from being added to a diagnostic. `.disable_suggestions()` is the closest but it gets rid of all suggestions before and after the call.
Therefore, `.seal_suggestions()` can be used when, for example, misspelled keyword is detected and reported. In such cases, we may want to prevent other suggestions from being added to the diagnostic, as they would likely be meaningless once the misspelled keyword is identified. For context: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129899#discussion_r1741307132
To store an additional state, the type of the `suggestions` field in `DiagInner` was changed into a three variant enum. While this change affects files across different crates, care was taken to preserve the existing code's semantics. This is validated by the fact that all UI tests pass without any modifications.
r? chenyukang
tests: allow trunc/select instructions to be missing
On LLVM 20, these instructions already get eliminated, which at least partially satisfies a TODO. I'm not talented enough at using FileCheck to try and constrain this further, but if we really want to we could copy an LLVM 20 specific version of this test that would restore it to being CHECK-NEXT: insertvalue ...
`@rustbot` label: +llvm-main
r? `@DianQK`
Currently constants are "pulled forward" and have their stack spills emitted
first. This confuses LLVM as to where to place breakpoints at function
entry, and results in argument values being wrong in the debugger. It's
straightforward to avoid emitting the stack spills for constants until
arguments/etc have been introduced in debug_introduce_locals, so do that.
Example LLVM IR (irrelevant IR elided):
Before:
define internal void @_ZN11rust_1289457binding17h2c78f956ba4bd2c3E(i64 %a, i64 %b, double %c) unnamed_addr #0 !dbg !178 {
start:
%c.dbg.spill = alloca [8 x i8], align 8
%b.dbg.spill = alloca [8 x i8], align 8
%a.dbg.spill = alloca [8 x i8], align 8
%x.dbg.spill = alloca [4 x i8], align 4
store i32 0, ptr %x.dbg.spill, align 4, !dbg !192 ; LLVM places breakpoint here.
#dbg_declare(ptr %x.dbg.spill, !190, !DIExpression(), !192)
store i64 %a, ptr %a.dbg.spill, align 8
#dbg_declare(ptr %a.dbg.spill, !187, !DIExpression(), !193)
store i64 %b, ptr %b.dbg.spill, align 8
#dbg_declare(ptr %b.dbg.spill, !188, !DIExpression(), !194)
store double %c, ptr %c.dbg.spill, align 8
#dbg_declare(ptr %c.dbg.spill, !189, !DIExpression(), !195)
ret void, !dbg !196
}
After:
define internal void @_ZN11rust_1289457binding17h2c78f956ba4bd2c3E(i64 %a, i64 %b, double %c) unnamed_addr #0 !dbg !178 {
start:
%x.dbg.spill = alloca [4 x i8], align 4
%c.dbg.spill = alloca [8 x i8], align 8
%b.dbg.spill = alloca [8 x i8], align 8
%a.dbg.spill = alloca [8 x i8], align 8
store i64 %a, ptr %a.dbg.spill, align 8
#dbg_declare(ptr %a.dbg.spill, !187, !DIExpression(), !192)
store i64 %b, ptr %b.dbg.spill, align 8
#dbg_declare(ptr %b.dbg.spill, !188, !DIExpression(), !193)
store double %c, ptr %c.dbg.spill, align 8
#dbg_declare(ptr %c.dbg.spill, !189, !DIExpression(), !194)
store i32 0, ptr %x.dbg.spill, align 4, !dbg !195 ; LLVM places breakpoint here.
#dbg_declare(ptr %x.dbg.spill, !190, !DIExpression(), !195)
ret void, !dbg !196
}
Note in particular the position of the "LLVM places breakpoint here" comment
relative to the stack spills for the function arguments. LLVM assumes that
the first instruction with with a debug location is the end of the prologue.
As LLVM does not currently offer front ends any direct control over the
placement of the prologue end reordering the IR is the only mechanism available
to fix argument values at function entry in the presence of MIR optimizations
like SingleUseConsts. Fixes#128945
Remove redundant test typeid equality by subtyping
This known-bug label was a left over on #118247
r? `@jackh726`
This doesn't address #110395, I didn't investigate about it yet.
In 2021 pat was changed to recognize `|` at the top level, with
pat_param added to retain the old behavior. This means
pat is subject to the same cross-edition behavior as expr will be in
2024.
Co-authored-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
There's a subtle interaction between macros with metavar expressions and the
edition-dependent fragment matching behavior. This test illustrates the current
behavior when using macro-generating-macros across crate boundaries with
different editions.
Co-Authored-By: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Eric Holk <eric@theincredibleholk.org>
