Automatically taint when reporting errors from ItemCtxt
This isn't very robust yet, as you need to use `itemctxt.dcx()` instead of `tcx.dcx()` for it to take effect, but it's at least more convenient than sprinkling `set_tainted_by_errors` calls in individual places.
based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127357
r? `@fmease`
[Coverage][MCDC] Group mcdc tests and fix panic when generating mcdc code for inlined expressions.
### Changes
1. Group all mcdc tests to one directory.
2. Since mcdc instruments different mappings for boolean expressions with normal branch coverage as #125766 introduces, it would be better also trace branch coverage results in mcdc tests.
3. So far rustc does not call `CoverageInfoBuilderMethods::init_coverage` for inlined functions. As a result, it could panic if it tries to instrument mcdc statements for inlined functions due to uninitialized cond bitmaps. We can reproduce this issue by current nightly rustc and [the test](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127234/files#diff-c81af6bf4869aa42f5c7334e3e86344475de362f673f54ce439ec75fcb5ac3e5) with flag `--release`. This patch fixes it.
This is adding a migration lint for the current (in the 2021 edition and previous)
to move expr to expr_2021 from expr
Co-Developed-by: Eric Holk
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
Fix regression in the MIR lowering of or-patterns
In https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/126553 I made a silly indexing mistake and regressed the MIR lowering of or-patterns. This fixes it.
r? `@compiler-errors` because I'd like this to be merged quickly 🙏
Consolidate region error reporting in `rustc_infer`
More work on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/127492. Separate but important step, since I'm gonna likely pull everything else here into another module.
I don't think I'm confident whether `nice_region_error` should be a submodule of the new `rustc_infer::infer::error_reporting::region` module, so I left it alone for now.
r? lcnr
Move trait selection error reporting to its own top-level module
This effectively moves `rustc_trait_selection::traits::error_reporting` to `rustc_trait_selection::error_reporting::traits`. There are only a couple of actual changes to the code, like moving the `pretty_impl_header` fn out of the specialization module for privacy reasons.
This is quite pointless on its own, but having `error_reporting` as a top-level module in `rustc_trait_selection` is very important to make sure we have a meaningful file structure for when we move **type** error reporting (and region error reporting, with which it's incredibly entangled currently) into `rustc_trait_selection`. I've opened a tracking issue here: #127492
r? lcnr
Add Natvis visualiser and debuginfo tests for `f16`
To render `f16`s in debuggers on MSVC targets, this PR changes the compiler to output `f16`s as `struct f16 { bits: u16 }`, and includes a Natvis visualiser that manually converts the `f16`'s bits to a `float` which is can then be displayed by debuggers. `gdb`, `lldb` and `cdb` tests are also included for `f16` .
`f16`/`f128` MSVC debug info issue: #121837
Tracking issue: #116909
Infer async closure signature from (old-style) two-part `Fn` + `Future` bounds
When an async closure is passed to a function that has a "two-part" `Fn` and `Future` trait bound, like:
```rust
use std::future::Future;
fn not_exactly_an_async_closure(_f: F)
where
F: FnOnce(String) -> Fut,
Fut: Future<Output = ()>,
{}
```
The we want to be able to extract the signature to guide inference in the async closure, like:
```rust
not_exactly_an_async_closure(async |string| {
for x in string.split('\n') { ... }
//~^ We need to know that the type of `string` is `String` to call methods on it.
})
```
Closure signature inference will see two bounds: `<?F as FnOnce<Args>>::Output = ?Fut`, `<?Fut as Future>::Output = String`. We need to extract the signature by looking through both projections.
### Why?
I expect the ecosystem's move onto `async Fn` trait bounds (which are not affected by this PR, and already do signature inference fine) to be slow. In the mean time, I don't see major overhead to supporting this "old–style" of trait bounds that were used to model async closures.
r? oli-obk
Fixes#127468Fixes#127425
Make casts of pointers to trait objects stricter
This is an attempt to `fix` https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120222 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120217.
This is done by adding restrictions on casting pointers to trait objects.
Before this PR the rules were as follows:
> When casting `*const X<dyn A>` -> `*const Y<dyn B>`, principal traits in `A` and `B` must refer to the same trait definition (or no trait).
With this PR the rules are changed to
> When casting `*const X<dyn Src>` -> `*const Y<dyn Dst>`
> - if `Dst` has a principal trait `DstP`,
> - `Src` must have a principal trait `SrcP`
> - `dyn SrcP` and `dyn DstP` must be the same type (modulo the trait object lifetime, `dyn T+'a` -> `dyn T+'b` is allowed)
> - Auto traits in `Dst` must be a subset of auto traits in `Src`
> - Not adhering to this is currently a FCW (warn-by-default + `FutureReleaseErrorReportInDeps`), instead of an error
> - if `Src` has a principal trait `Dst` must as well
> - this restriction will be removed in a follow up PR
This ensures that
1. Principal trait's generic arguments match (no `*const dyn Tr<A>` -> `*const dyn Tr<B>` casts, which are a problem for [#120222](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120222))
2. Principal trait's lifetime arguments match (no `*const dyn Tr<'a>` -> `*const dyn Tr<'b>` casts, which are a problem for [#120217](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120217))
3. No auto traits can be _added_ (this is a problem for arbitrary self types, see [this comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120248#discussion_r1463835350))
Some notes:
- We only care about the metadata/last field, so you can still cast `*const dyn T` to `*const WithHeader<dyn T>`, etc
- The lifetime of the trait object itself (`dyn A + 'lt`) is not checked, so you can still cast `*mut FnOnce() + '_` to `*mut FnOnce() + 'static`, etc
- This feels fishy, but I couldn't come up with a reason it must be checked
The diagnostics are currently not great, to say the least, but as far as I can tell this correctly fixes the issues.
cc `@oli-obk` `@compiler-errors` `@lcnr`
coverage: Extract hole spans from HIR instead of MIR
This makes it possible to treat more kinds of nested item/code as holes, instead of being restricted to closures.
(It also potentially opens up the possibility of using HIR holes to modify branch or MC/DC spans, though we currently don't actually do this.)
Thus, this new implementation treats the following as holes:
- Closures (as before, including `async` and coroutines)
- All nested items
- Inline `const` (because why not)
This gives more accurate coverage reports, because lines occupied by holes don't show the execution count from the enclosing function.
Fixes#126626.
Make `push_outlives_components` into a `TypeVisitor`
This involves removing the `visited: &mut SsoHashSet<GenericArg<'tcx>>` that is being passed around the `VerifyBoundCx`. The fact that we were using it when decomposing different type tests seems sketchy, so I don't think, though it may technically result in us registering more redundant outlives components 🤷
I did end up deleting some of the comments that referred back to RFC 1214 during this refactor. I can add them back if you think they were useful.
r? lcnr
There's a comment saying we don't do it for performance reasons, but it
doesn't actually affect performance.
The commit also tweaks the control flow, to make clearer that two code
paths are mutually exclusive.
