Designing a good hover microinteraction is a matter of guessing
user intent from what are, literally, vague gestures. In this case,
guessing if hovering in our out of the tooltip base is intentional
or not.
To figure this out, a few different techniques are used:
* When the mouse pointer enters a tooltip anchor point, its hitbox
is grown on the bottom, where the popover is/will appear. This was
already there before this commit: search "hover tunnel" in
rustdoc.css for the implementation.
* This commit adds a delay when the mouse pointer enters the base
anchor, in case the mouse pointer was just passing through and the
user didn't want to open it.
* This commit also adds a delay when the mouse pointer exits the
tooltip's base anchor or its popover, before hiding it.
* A fade-out animation is layered onto the pointer exit delay to
immediately inform the user that they successfully dismissed the
popover, while still providing a way for them to cancel it if
it was a mistake and they still wanted to interact with it.
* No animation is used for revealing it, because we don't want
people to try to interact with an element while it's in the
middle of fading in: either they're allowed to interact with
it while it's fading in, meaning it can't serve as mistake-
proofing for opening the popover, or they can't, but they
might try and be frustrated.
See also:
* https://www.nngroup.com/articles/timing-exposing-content/
* https://www.nngroup.com/articles/tooltip-guidelines/
* https://bjk5.com/post/44698559168/breaking-down-amazons-mega-dropdown
CFI: Fix encode_region: unexpected ReEarlyBound(0, 'a)
Fixes#111515 and complements #106547 by adding support for encoding early bound regions and also excluding projections when transforming trait objects' traits into their identities before emitting type checks.
fix(resolve): not defined `extern crate shadow_name`
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/109148
## Why does #109148 panic?
When resolving `use std::xx` it enters `visit_scopes` from `early_resolve_ident_in_lexical_scope`, and iters twice during the loop:
|iter| `scope` | `break_result` | result |
|-|-|-|-|
| 0 | `Module` pointed to root | binding pointed to `Undetermined`, so result is `None` | scope changed to `ExternPrelude` |
| 1 | `ExternPrelude` | binding pointed to `std` | - |
Then, the result of `maybe_resolve_path` is `Module(std)`, so `import.imported_module.set` is executed.
Finally, during the `finalize_import` of `use std::xx`, `resolve_path` returns `NonModule` because `Binding(Ident(std), Module(root)`'s binding points to `extern crate blah as std`, which causes the assertion to fail at `assert!(import.imported_module.get().is_none());`.
## Investigation
The question is why `#[a] extern crate blah as std` is not defined as a binding of `std::xxx`, which causes the iteration twice during `visit_scopes` when resolving `std::xxx`. Ideally, the value of `break_result.is_some()` should have been valid in the first iteration.
After debugging, I found that because `#[a] extern crate blah as std` had been dummied by `placeholder` during `collect_invocations`, so it had lost its attrs, span, etc..., so it will not be defined. However, `expand_invoc` added them back, then the next `build_reduced_graph`, `#[a] extern crate blah as std` would have been defined, so it makes the result of `resolved_path` unexpected, and the program panics.
## Try to solve
I think there has two-way to solve this issue:
- Expand invocations before the first `resolve_imports` during `fully_expand_fragment`. However, I do not think this is a good idea because it would mess up the current design.
- As my PR described: do not define to `extern crate blah as std` during the second `build_reduced_graph`, which is very easy and more reasonable.
r? `@petrochenkov`
The `rust-call` ABI isn't compatible with
`#![feature(unsized_fn_params)]`, so trying to use that feature with
closures leads to an ICE (#67981). This turns that ICE into a
type-check error.
Fixes#111515 and complements #106547 by adding support for encoding
early bound regions and also excluding projections when transforming
trait objects' traits into their identities before emitting type checks.
Fix some issues with folded AArch64 features
In #91608 the `fp` feature was removed for AArch64 and folded into the `neon` feature, however disabling the `neon` feature doesn't actually disable the `fp` feature. If my understanding on that thread is correct it should do.
While doing this, I also noticed that disabling some features would disable features that it shouldn't. For instance enabling `sve` will enable `neon`, however, when disabling `sve` it would then also disable `neon`, I wouldn't expect disabling `sve` to also disable `neon`.
cc `@workingjubilee`
When compiling with panic=abort (or using a target that doesn't have
unwinding support), the compiler adds the "nounwind" attribute to
functions. This results in a different LLVM IR, which results in a #NNN
added after the function name:
tail call void @bar() #13, !dbg !467
attributes #13 = { nounwind }
...instead of:
tail call void @bar(), !dbg !467
This commit changes the matchers to swallow the #NNN, as it's not needed
for these specific tests.
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #111461 (Fix symbol conflict diagnostic mistakenly being shown instead of missing crate diagnostic)
- #111579 (Also assume wrap-around discriminants in `as` MIR building)
- #111704 (Remove return type sized check hack from hir typeck)
- #111853 (Check opaques for mismatch during writeback)
- #111854 (rustdoc: clean up `settings.css`)
- #111860 (Don't ICE if method receiver fails to unify with `arbitrary_self_types`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Don't ICE if method receiver fails to unify with `arbitrary_self_types`
Consider:
```rust
struct Foo(u32);
impl Foo {
fn get<R: Deref<Target=Self>>(self: R) -> u32 {
self.0
}
}
fn main() {
let mut foo = Foo(1);
foo.get::<&Foo>();
}
```
The problem here is that with `arbitrary_self_types`, we're allowed to have a method receiver that mentions generics from the method itself (`fn get<R: Deref<Target=Self>>(self: R)`). Since we don't actually take into account the user-written turbofish generics when doing method lookup (nor do we check that method predicates hold), method probing will happily infer `R = Foo` during the probe. When we later confirm the method, we do use the turbofish'd subst and instead now have that `R = &Foo`. This doesn't unify with the self type we chose during the probe, causing an ICE.
Getting this to work correctly will be difficult. Specifically, we'll need to actually pass in the turbofish generics for the method being probed for and check that the self type unifies considering those generics. This seems like a lot of work, and I'm not actually familiar with the restrictions originally called out for `#![feature(arbitrary_self_types)]`, but I think we should probably instead just deny having receivers that mention (type/const) generics that come from the method itself.
But I mostly just want to turn this ICE into an error, so I'll leave that up for later PRs.
Fixes#111838
Check opaques for mismatch during writeback
Revive #111705.
I realized that we don't need to put any substs in the writeback results since all of the hidden types have already been remapped. See the comment in `compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/typeck_results.rs`, which should make that clear for other explorers of the codebase.
Additionally, we need to do some diagnostic stashing because the diagnostics we produce during HIR typeck is very poor and we should prefer the diagnostic that comes from MIR, if we have one.
r? `@oli-obk`
Remove return type sized check hack from hir typeck
Remove a bunch of special-cased suggestions when someone returns `-> dyn Trait` that checks for type equality, etc.
This was a pretty complex piece of code that also relied on a hack in hir typeck (see changes to `compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/check.rs`), and I'm not convinced that it's necessary to maintain, when all we really need to tell the user is that they should return `-> impl Trait` or `-> Box<dyn Trait>`, depending on their specific use-case.
This is necessary because we may need to move the "return type is sized" check from hir typeck to wfcheck, which does not have access to typeck results. This is a prerequisite for that, and I'm fairly confident that the diagnostics "regressions" here are not a big deal.
[rustc_ty_utils] Treat `drop_in_place`'s *mut argument like &mut when adding LLVM attributes
This resurrects PR #103614, which has sat idle for a while.
This could probably use a new perf run, since we're on a new LLVM version now.
r? `@oli-obk`
cc `@RalfJung`
---
LLVM can make use of the `noalias` parameter attribute on the parameter to `drop_in_place` in areas like argument promotion. Because the Rust compiler fully controls the code for `drop_in_place`, it can soundly deduce parameter attributes on it.
In #103957, Miri was changed to retag `drop_in_place`'s argument as if it was `&mut`, matching this change.
Deal with unnormalized projections when structurally resolving types with new solver
1. Normalize types in `structurally_resolved_type` when the new solver is enabled
2. Normalize built-in autoderef targets in `Autoderef` when the new solver is enabled
3. Normalize-erasing-regions in `resolve_type` in writeback
This is motivated by the UI test provided, which currently fails with:
```
error[E0609]: no field `x` on type `<usize as SliceIndex<[Foo]>>::Output`
--> <source>:9:11
|
9 | xs[0].x = 1;
| ^
```
I'm pretty happy with the approach in (1.) and (2.) and think we'll inevitably need something like this in the long-term, but (3.) seems like a hack to me. It's a *lot* of work to add tons of new calls to every user of these typeck results though (mir build, late lints, etc). Happy to discuss further.
r? `@lcnr`
This was added to control percentage sizes, in
79956b96e8
Now, the only percentage size is [`border-radius`], which is
based on the size of the box itself, not its containing block.
This leaves the property unused.
[`border-radius`]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/border-radius
Give better error when collecting into `&[T]`
The detection of slice reference of `{integral}` in `rustc_on_unimplemented` is hacky, but a proper solution requires changing `FmtPrinter` to add a parameter to print integers as `{integral}` and I didn't want to change it just for `rustc_on_unimplemented`. I can do that if requested, though.
I'm open to better wording; this is the best I could come up with.
fix recursion depth handling after confirmation
fixes#111729
I think having to use `Obligation::with_depth` correctly everywhere is very hard because e.g. the nested obligations from `eq` currently do not have the correct obligation depth.
The new solver [completely removes `recursion_depth` from obligations](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_middle/traits/solve/struct.Goal.html) and instead tracks the depth in the solver itself which is far easier to get right. Moving the old solver towards this shouldn't be that hard but is probably somewhat annoying.
r? `@matthewjasper`
Fix duplicate `arcinner_layout_for_value_layout` calls when using the uninit `Arc` constructors
What this fixes is the duplicate calls to `arcinner_layout_for_value_layout` seen here: https://godbolt.org/z/jr5Gxozhj
The issue was discovered alongside #111603 but is otherwise unrelated to the duplicate `alloca`s, which remain unsolved. Everything I tried to solve said main issue has failed.
As for the duplicate layout calculations, I also tried slapping `#[inline]` and `#[inline(always)]` on everything in sight but the only thing that worked in the end is to dedup the calls by hand.
Rather than returning an array of features from to_llvm_features, return a structure that contains
the dependencies. This also contains metadata on how the features depend on each other to allow for
the correct enabling and disabling.
Some features that are tied together only make sense to be folded
together when enabling the feature. For example on AArch64 sve and
neon are tied together, however it doesn't make sense to disable neon
when disabling sve.
