Improve heuristics whether `format_args` string is a source literal
Previously, it only checked whether there was _a_ literal at the span of the first argument, not whether the literal actually matched up. This caused issues when a proc macro was generating a different literal with the same span.
This requires an annoying special case for literals ending in `\n` because otherwise `println` wouldn't give detailed diagnostics anymore which would be bad.
Fixes#106191
Currently, given `Fn`-family traits with lifetime params like
`Fn<'a>(&'a str) -> bool`, many unhelpful errors show up. These are a
bit confusing.
This commit allows these situations to suggest simply using
higher-ranked trait bounds like `for<'a> Fn(&'a str) -> bool`.
Bump master bootstrap compiler
This PR bumps the bootstrap compiler to the beta created earlier this week, cherry-picks the stabilization version number updates, and updates the `cfg(bootstrap)`s.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Properly calculate best failure in macro matching
Previously, we used spans. This was not good. Sometimes, the span of the token that failed to match may come from a position later in the file which has been transcribed into a token stream way earlier in the file. If precisely this token fails to match, we think that it was the best match because its span is so high, even though other arms might have gotten further in the token stream.
We now try to properly use the location in the token stream.
This needs a little cleanup as the `best_failure` field is getting out of hand but it should be mostly good to go. I hope I didn't violate too many abstraction boundaries..
Previously, it only checked whether there was _a_ literal at the span of
the first argument, not whether the literal actually matched up. This
caused issues when a proc macro was generating a different literal with
the same span.
This requires an annoying special case for literals ending in `\n`
because otherwise `println` wouldn't give detailed diagnostics anymore
which would be bad.
docs/test: add UI test and long-form error docs for `E0461`
Might take a couple of tries to pass CI. The UI test is x86-linux only; I'm not sure how to generalize it to other architectures.
r? ``@GuillaumeGomez``
Some `compare_method` tweaks
1. Make some of the comparison functions' names more regular
2. Reduce pub scope of some of the things in `compare_method`
~3. Remove some unnecessary opaque type handling code -- `InferCtxt` already is in a mode that doesn't define opaque types~
* moved to a different PR
4. Bubble up `ErrorGuaranteed` for region constraint errors in `compare_method` - Improves a redundant error message in one unit test.
5. Move the `compare_method` module to have a more general name, since it's more like `compare_impl_item` :)
6. Rename `collect_trait_impl_trait_tys`
Remove some totally duplicated files in `rustc_infer`
I have no idea why or how I duplicated these files from `compiler/rustc_infer/src/infer/error_reporting/note.rs`, but I did by accident, and nothing caught it 🤦
