Don't use `ConstraintCategory::ClosureBounds`!
Set the category and the span for the promoted constraints to that of
the original constraint earlier than before.
This eliminates the need for `closure_bounds_mapping`.
LLVM 16: Switch to using MemoryEffects
This adapts the compiler to the changes required by 304f1d59ca.
AFAICT, `WriteOnly` isn't used by the compiler, all `ReadNone` uses were migrated and the remaining use of `ReadOnly` is only for function parameters.
To simplify the FFI, this PR uses an enum to represent `MemoryEffects` across the FFI boundary, which then gets mapped to the matching static factory method when constructing the attribute.
Fixes#103961.
`@rustbot` label +llvm-main
r? `@nikic`
Give a specific lint for unsafety not being inherited
In cases like
```rs
static mut FOO: u64 = 0;
fn main() {
unsafe {static BAR: u64 = FOO;}
}
```
and
```rs
fn foo() {
unsafe {
fn bar() {
unsafe_call();
}
}
}
```
Specifically inform the user that the unsafety is not inherited for the seperate enclosing items
Fixes#94077
r? compiler-errors
`@rustbot` label +A-diagnostics
minor changes to make method lookup diagnostic code easier to read
The end result of around 4 days of trying to understand this 1000+ line long function- a bunch of tiny nitpicks
r? `@compiler-errors`
asm: Work around LLVM bug on AArch64
Upstream issue: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/58384
LLVM gets confused if we assign a 32-bit value to a 64-bit register, so pass the 32-bit register name to LLVM in that case.
Port `dead_code` lints to be translatable.
This adds an additional comma to lists with three or more items, to be consistent with list formatters like `icu4x`.
r? `@davidtwco`
Fix ICE when negative impl is collected during eager mono
```rust
trait Foo {
fn foo() {}
}
impl !Foo for () {}
```
This code will currently cause an ICE when mono collection mode is "eager" (with `-C link-dead-code=y` or `-Z print-mono-items=eager`.
Fix late-bound lifetime closure ICEs in HIR typeck and MIR borrowck
During HIR typeck, we need to teach astconv to treat late-bound regions within a closure body as free, fixing escaping bound vars ICEs in both of the issues below.
However, this then gets us to MIR borrowck, which itself needs to be taught how to instantiate free region vids for late-bound regions that come from items that _aren't_ the typeck root (for now, just closures).
Fixes#103771Fixes#103736
asm: Match clang behavior for inlateout fixed register operands
We have 2 options for representing LLVM constraints for `inlateout` operands on a fixed register (e.g. `r0`): `={r0},0` or `={r0},{r0}`.
This PR changes the behavior to the latter, which matches the behavior of Clang since https://reviews.llvm.org/D87279.
Add visit_fn_ret_ty to hir intravisit
I'm working on some RPITIT changes and I need to specialize `visit_fn_ret_ty` in my visitor impl. So I guess it's better to land it separately.
r? `@compiler-errors`
FIX - StrippingDebugInfoFailed typo
DELETE - unneeded FIXME comment
UPDATE - only declare the error with ExtractBundledLibsError as an enum and use the Diagnostic derive macro
It deals with eight cases: ints, floats, and the six quoted types
(char/byte/strings). For ints and floats we have an early return, and
the other six types fall through to the code at the end, which makes the
function hard to read.
This commit rearranges things to avoid the early returns.
There are three kinds of "byte" literals: byte literals, byte string
literals, and raw byte string literals. None are allowed to have
non-ASCII chars in them.
Two `EscapeError` variants exist for when that constraint is violated.
- `NonAsciiCharInByte`: used for byte literals and byte string literals.
- `NonAsciiCharInByteString`: used for raw byte string literals.
As a result, the messages for raw byte string literals use different
wording, without good reason. Also, byte string literals are incorrectly
described as "byte constants" in some error messages.
This commit eliminates `NonAsciiCharInByteString` so the three cases are
handled similarly, and described correctly. The `mode` is enough to
distinguish them.
Note: Some existing error messages mention "byte constants" and some
mention "byte literals". I went with the latter here, because it's a
more correct name, as used by the Reference.
