Cleanup things in and around `Diagnostic`
These changes all arose when I was looking closely at how to simplify `DiagCtxtInner::emit_diagnostic`.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Pass LLVM error message back to pass wrapper.
When rustc fails to load a plugin, it should provide more detailed error message. Before this PR, rustc prints:
```
error: failed to run LLVM passes: Failed to load pass pluginPLUGIN_NAME.so
```
This PR passes LLVM errors back to rustc. After this PR, rustc prints:
```
error: failed to run LLVM passes: Could not load library 'PLUGIN_NAME.so': PLUGIN_NAME.so: undefined symbol: _ZN4llvm9DebugFlagE
```
This PR only contains usability improvements and does not change any functionality. Thus, no new unit test is implemented.
Exhaustiveness: use an `Option` instead of allocating fictitious patterns
In the process of exhaustiveness checking, `Matrix` stores a 2D array of patterns. Those are subpatterns of the patterns we were provided as input, _except_ sometimes we allocate some extra wildcard patterns to fill a hole during specialization.
Morally though, we could store `Option<&'p DeconstructedPat>` in the matrix, where `None` signifies a wildcard. That way we'd only have "real" patterns in the matrix and we wouldn't need the arena to allocate these wildcards. This is what this PR does.
This is part of me splitting up https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/119581 for ease of review.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Of the error levels satisfying `is_error`, `Level::Error` is the only
one that can be a lint, so there's no need to check for it.
(And even if it wasn't, it would make more sense to include
non-`Error`-but-`is_error` lints under `lint_err_count` than under
`err_count`.)
There are four functions that adjust error and warning counts:
- `stash_diagnostic` (increment)
- `steal_diagnostic` (decrement)
- `emit_stashed_diagnostics) (decrement)
- `emit_diagnostic` (increment)
The first three all behave similarly, and only update `warn_count` for
forced warnings. But the last one updates `warn_count` for both forced
and non-forced warnings.
Seems like a bug. How should it be fixed? Well, `warn_count` is only
used in one place: `DiagCtxtInner::drop`, where it's part of the
condition relating to the printing of `good_path_delayed_bugs`. The
intention of that condition seems to be "have any errors been printed?"
so this commit replaces `warn_count` with `has_printed`, which is set
when printing occurs. This is simpler than all the ahead-of-time
incrementing and decrementing.
`is_force_warn` is only possible for diagnostics with `Level::Warning`,
but it is currently stored in `Diagnostic::code`, which every diagnostic
has.
This commit:
- removes the boolean `DiagnosticId::Lint::is_force_warn` field;
- adds a `ForceWarning` variant to `Level`.
Benefits:
- The common `Level::Warning` case now has no arguments, replacing
lots of `Warning(None)` occurrences.
- `rustc_session::lint::Level` and `rustc_errors::Level` are more
similar, both having `ForceWarning` and `Warning`.
When writing a no_std binary, you'll be greeted with nonsensical errors
mentioning lang items like eh_personality and start. That's pretty bad
because it makes you think that you need to define them somewhere! But
oh no, now you're getting the `internal_features` lint telling you that
you shouldn't use them! But you need a no_std binary! What now?
No problem! Writing a no_std binary is super easy. Just use panic=abort
and supply your own platform specific entrypoint symbol (like `main`)
and you're good to go. Would be nice if the compiler told you that,
right?
This makes it so that it does do that.
Diagnostic API fixes
Some improvements to diagnostic APIs: improve some naming, use shortcuts in more places, and add a couple of missing methods.
r? `@compiler-errors`
This stabilizes all methods under `slice_first_last_chunk`.
Additionally, it const stabilizes the non-mut functions and moves the `_mut`
functions under `const_slice_first_last_chunk`. These are blocked on
`const_mut_refs`.
As part of this change, `slice_split_at_unchecked` was marked const-stable for
internal use (but not fully stable).
This removes emit_enum_variant and the emit_usize calls that resulted
in. In libcore this eliminates 17% of leb128, taking us from 8964488 to
7383842 leb128's serialized.
100% of the serialized enums during libcore compilation fit into the
smaller tag, and this eliminates hitting the leb128 code for
coding/decoding when we can statically guarantee that's not required.
30% of all leb128 integers serialized in libcore (12981183 total) come
from the usize's removed here.
Avoid silencing relevant follow-up errors
r? `@matthewjasper`
This PR only adds new errors to tests that are already failing and fixes one ICE.
Several tests were changed to not emit new errors. I believe all of them were faulty tests, and not explicitly testing for the code that had new errors.
This lets us avoid the use of `DiagnosticBuilder::into_diagnostic` in
miri, when then means that `DiagnosticBuilder::into_diagnostic` can
become private, being now only used by `stash` and `buffer`.
In #119606 I added them and used a `_mv` suffix, but that wasn't great.
A `with_` prefix has three different existing uses.
- Constructors, e.g. `Vec::with_capacity`.
- Wrappers that provide an environment to execute some code, e.g.
`with_session_globals`.
- Consuming chaining methods, e.g. `Span::with_{lo,hi,ctxt}`.
The third case is exactly what we want, so this commit changes
`DiagnosticBuilder::foo_mv` to `DiagnosticBuilder::with_foo`.
Thanks to @compiler-errors for the suggestion.
We have `span_delayed_bug` and often pass it a `DUMMY_SP`. This commit
adds `delayed_bug`, which matches pairs like `err`/`span_err` and
`warn`/`span_warn`.
- `struct_foo` + `emit` -> `foo`
- `create_foo` + `emit` -> `emit_foo`
I have made recent commits in other PRs that have removed some of these
shortcuts for combinations with few uses, e.g.
`struct_span_err_with_code`. But for the remaining combinations that
have high levels of use, we might as well use them wherever possible.
Because it takes an error code after the span. This avoids the confusing
overlap with the `DiagCtxt::struct_span_err` method, which doesn't take
an error code.
`~const` trait and projection bounds do not imply their non-const counterparts
This PR removes the hack where we install a non-const trait and projection bound for every `const_trait` and `~const` projection bound we have in the AST. It ends up messing up more things than it fixes, see words below.
Fixes#119718
cc `@fmease` `@fee1-dead` `@oli-obk`
r? fee1-dead or one of y'all i don't care
---
My understanding is that this hack was added to support the following code:
```rust
pub trait Owo<X = <Self as Uwu>::T> {}
#[const_trait]
pub trait Uwu: Owo {}
```
Which is concretely lifted from in the `FromResidual` and `Try` traits. Since within the param-env of `trait Uwu`, we only know that `Self: ~const Uwu` and not `Self: Uwu`, the projection `<Self as Uwu>::T` is not satsifyable.
This causes problems such as #119718, since instantiations of `FnDef` types coming from `const fn` really do **only** implement one of `FnOnce` or `const FnOnce`!
---
In the long-term, I believe that such code should really look something more like:
```rust
#[const_trait]
pub trait Owo<X = <Self as ~const Uwu>::T> {}
#[const_trait]
pub trait Uwu: Owo {}
```
... and that we should introduce some sort of `<T as ~const Foo>::Bar` bound syntax, since due to the fact that `~const` bounds can be present in item bounds, e.g.
```rust
#[const_trait] trait Foo { type Bar: ~const Destruct; }
```
It's easy to see that `<T as Foo>::Bar` and `<T as ~const Foo>::Bar` (or `<T as const Foo>::Bar`) can be distinct types with distinct item bounds!
**Admission**: I know I've said before that I don't like `~const` projection syntax, I do at this point believe they're necessary to fully express bounds and types in a maybe-const world.
