By moving this stability check into AST lowering, we effectively make
it impossible to accidentally miss, as it must happen to generate HIR.
Also, we put the ABI-stability code next to code that actually uses it!
This allows code that wants to reason about backend ABI implementations
to stop worrying about high-level concerns like syntax stability,
while still leaving it as the authority on what ABIs actually exist.
It also makes it easy to refactor things to have more consistent errors.
For now, we only apply this to generalize the existing messages a bit.
DWARF 1 is very different than DWARF 2+ (see the commentary in
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Debugging-Options.html#index-gdwarf)
and LLVM does not really seem to support DWARF 1 as Clang does not offer
a `-gdwarf-1` flag and `llc` will just generate DWARF 2 with the version
set to 1: https://godbolt.org/z/s85d87n3a.
Since this isn't actually supported (and it's not clear it would be
useful anyway), report that DWARF 1 is not supported if it is requested.
Also add a help message to the error saying which versions are supported.
Update bootstrap compiler and rustfmt
The rustfmt version we previously used formats things differently from what the latest nightly rustfmt does. This causes issues for subtrees that get formatted both in-tree and in their own repo. Updating the rustfmt used in-tree solves those issues. Also bumped the bootstrap compiler as the stage0 update command always updates both at the same
time.
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #134679 (Windows: remove readonly files)
- #136213 (Allow Rust to use a number of libc filesystem calls)
- #136530 (Implement `x perf` directly in bootstrap)
- #136601 (Detect (non-raw) borrows of null ZST pointers in CheckNull)
- #136659 (Pick the max DWARF version when LTO'ing modules with different versions )
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
transmutability: fix ICE when passing wrong ADT to ASSUME
- Remove an incorrect assert that the `ASSUME` parameter has the type `Assume` and delay a bug instead.
- Since we checked the type of `ASSUME` is `Assume` (an ADT), its valtree must be a branch, so we can just unwrap it.
r? ```@jswrenn```
Add a comment pointing to ICE-136223
Fixes#136223
## Steps how the ICE happen
This explanation is based on the test case `&Some(Some(x)) = &Some(&mut Some(0))`.
The case should fail with E0596 error, but it catches the debug assertion instead.
1. For the first `&`: In check_pat_ref(), the value max_ref_mutbl becomes MutblCap::Not ([here](fdd1a3b026/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/pat.rs (L2394-L2396))). Once max_ref_mutbl becomes Not, it will never be back to MutblCap::Mut.
2. For `&mut`: In peel_off_references(), because Some(x) doesn't have `&` nor `&mut`, `&mut` in `&mut Some(0)` is not consumed then default_binding_mode (def_br) becomes `ByRef::Yes(Mutability::Mut)` (around [here](fdd1a3b026/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/pat.rs (L519-L536))). This will be inherited to the next step. So this pattern has the mismatch between `def_br=Yes(Mut)` and `max_ref_mutbl=Not` now.
3. For the value `0`: Because of the step 2, the default_binding_mode is `Yes(Mut)`, but max_ref_mutbl is `Not` from the step 1. It causes the assertion error [here](fdd1a3b026/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/pat.rs (L427-L430)).
## What this PR fixes
Step 1 has happened from [this commit](e2f3ce9568) by deleting `no_ref_mut_behind_and` from the if block. In my understanding, after RFC3627 is released, step 1 should happen not only 2024 edition but also other editions to track MutblCap value. But for now, it should not happen for non-2024 edition. So I put it back.
NOTE: I think there is another solution - We should return an E0596 error in calc_default_binding_mode() instead of the debug assertion. Since the assertion is caused by the mismatch between `def_br = Yes(Mut)` and `max_ref_mutbl = Not`, but in my understanding this violation is the same as E0596. check_pat_ident() does returns E0596 by a similar reason [here](fdd1a3b026/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/pat.rs (L837-L856)).
Pick the max DWARF version when LTO'ing modules with different versions
Currently, when rustc compiles code with `-Clto` enabled that was built
with different choices for `-Zdwarf-version`, a warning will be
reported. It's very easy to observe this by compiling most anything (eg,
"hello world") and specifying `-Clto -Zdwarf-version=5` since the
standard library is distributed with `-Zdwarf-version=4`.
This behavior isn't actually useful for a few reasons:
- From observation, LLVM chooses to pick the highest DWARF version
anyway after issuing the warning.
- Clang specifies that in this case, the max version should be picked
without a warning and as a general principle, we want to support
x-lang LTO with Clang which implies using the same module flag merge
behaviors.
- Debuggers need to be able to handle a variety of versions within the
same debugging session as you can easily have some parts of a binary
(or some dynamic libraries within an application) all compiled with
different DWARF versions.
This commit changes the module flag merge behavior to match Clang and
use the highest version of DWARF. It also adds a test to ensure this
behavior is respected in the case of two crates being LTO'd together and
adds a test to ensure no warning is printed.
Fixes#130041 which fails due to these warnings being printed
cc #103057
Generate correct terminate block under Wasm EH
This fixes failing LLVM assertions during insnsel.
Improves #135665.
r? bjorn3
^ you reviewed the PR bringing Wasm EH in, I assume this is within your area of expertise?
Currently, when rustc compiles code with `-Clto` enabled that was built
with different choices for `-Zdwarf-version`, a warning will be
reported. It's very easy to observe this by compiling most anything (eg,
"hello world") and specifying `-Clto -Zdwarf-version=5` since the
standard library is distributed with `-Zdwarf-version=4`.
This behavior isn't actually useful for a few reasons:
- from observation, LLVM chooses to pick the highest DWARF version
anyway after issuing the warning
- Clang specifies that in this case, the max version should be picked
without a warning and as a general principle, we want to support
x-lang LTO with Clang which implies using the same module flag merge
behaviors
- Debuggers need to be able to handle a variety of versions withing the
same debugging session as you can easily have some parts of a binary
(or some dynamic libraries within an application) all compiled with
different DWARF versions
This commit changes the module flag merge behavior to match Clang and
use the highest version of DWARF. It also adds a test to ensure this
behavior is respected in the case of two crates being LTO'd together and
updates the test added in the previous commit to ensure no warning is
printed.
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #136640 (Debuginfo for function ZSTs should have alignment of 8 bits, not 1 bit)
- #136648 (Add a missing `//@ needs-symlink` to `tests/run-make/libs-through-symlinks`)
- #136651 (Label mismatched parameters at the def site for foreign functions)
- #136691 (Remove Linkage::Private and Linkage::Appending)
- #136692 (add module level doc for bootstrap:utils:exec)
- #136700 (i686-unknown-hurd-gnu: bump baseline CPU to Pentium 4)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Label mismatched parameters at the def site for foreign functions
Nice and simple. Adds parameter marking for the only missing definition type.
r? ``@compiler-errors``
Debuginfo for function ZSTs should have alignment of 8 bits, not 1 bit
In #116096, function ZSTs were made to have debuginfo that gives them an alignment of “1”. But because alignment in LLVM debuginfo is denoted in *bits*, not bytes, this resulted in an alignment specification of 1 bit instead of 1 byte.
I don't know whether this has any practical consequences, but I noticed that a test started failing when I accidentally fixed the mistake while working on #136632, so I extracted the fix (and the test adjustment) to this PR.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #135179 (Make sure to use `Receiver` trait when extracting object method candidate)
- #136554 (Add `opt_alias_variances` and use it in outlives code)
- #136556 ([AIX] Update tests/ui/wait-forked-but-failed-child.rs to accomodate exiting and idle processes.)
- #136589 (Enable "jump to def" feature on rustc docs)
- #136615 (sys: net: Add UEFI stubs)
- #136635 (Remove outdated `base_port` calculation in std net test)
- #136682 (Move two windows process tests to tests/ui)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Move two windows process tests to tests/ui
Spawning processes from std unit tests is not something it's well suited for so moving them into tests/ui is more robust and means we don't need to hack around `cmd.exe`.
Follow up to #136630
[AIX] Update tests/ui/wait-forked-but-failed-child.rs to accomodate exiting and idle processes.
The `wait-forked-but-failed-child.rs` test expects to see an integer PPID in the
output of the command: `ps -A -o pid,ppid,args`.
However, on AIX, sometimes an integer PPID is not available when a process is
either exiting or idle, as documented in https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/aix/7.3?topic=p-ps-command.
In these situations, a `-` is instead shown in the PPID column of the `ps` output.
This PR updates the test to accommodate this behaviour on AIX by first filtering out the
lines of the `ps` output where a `-` is found in the `PPID` column.
Add `opt_alias_variances` and use it in outlives code
...so to fix some subtle outlives bugs with precise capturing in traits, and eventually make it easier to compute variances for "forced unconstrained" trait lifetimes.
r? lcnr
Make sure to use `Receiver` trait when extracting object method candidate
In method confirmation, the `extract_existential_trait_ref` function re-extracts the object type by derefing until it reaches an object. If we're assembling methods via the `Receiver` trait, make sure we re-do our work also using the receiver trait.
Fixes#135155
cc ``@adetaylor``
Pattern Migration 2024: try to suggest eliding redundant binding modifiers
This is based on #136475. Only the last commit is new.
This is a simpler, more restrictive alternative to #136496, meant to partially address #136047. If a pattern can be migrated to Rust 2024 solely by removing redundant binding modifiers, this will make that suggestion; otherwise, it uses the old suggestion of making the pattern fully explicit.
Relevant tracking issue: #131414
``@rustbot`` label A-diagnostics A-patterns A-edition-2024
r? ``@Nadrieril``
Remove some unnecessary parens in `assert!` conditions
While working on #122661, some of these started triggering our "unnecessary parens" lints due to a change in the `assert!` desugaring. A cursory search identified a few more. Some of these have been carried from before 1.0, were a bulk rename from the previous name of `assert!` left them in that state. I went and removed as many of these unnecessary parens as possible in order to have fewer annoyances in the future if we make the lint smarter.
fix tail call checks wrt `#[track_caller]`
Only check the caller + disallow caller having the attribute.
fixes#134336
r? `@compiler-errors`
<sub>apparently there were no tests for `#[track_caller]` before... ooops</sub>
Don't reset cast kind without also updating the operand in `simplify_cast` in GVN
Consider this heavily elided segment of the pre-GVN example code that was committed as a test:
```rust
let _4: *const ();
let _5: *const [()];
let mut _6: *const ();
let _7: *mut ();
let mut _8: *const [()];
let mut _9: std::boxed::Box<()>;
let mut _10: *const ();
/* ... */
// Deref a box
_10 = copy ((_9.0: std::ptr::Unique<()>).0: std::ptr::NonNull<()>) as *const () (Transmute);
_4 = copy _10;
_6 = copy _4;
// Inlined body of `slice::from_raw_parts`, to turn a unit pointer into a slice-of-unit pointer
_5 = *const [()] from (copy _6, copy _11);
_8 = copy _5;
// Cast the raw slice-of-unit pointer back to a unit pointer
_7 = copy _8 as *mut () (PtrToPtr);
```
A malformed optimization was changing `_7` (which casted the slice-of-unit ptr to a unit ptr) to:
```
_7 = copy _5 as *mut () (Transmute);
```
...where `_8` was just replaced with `_5` bc of simple copy propagation, that part is not important... the CastKind changing to Transmute is the important part here.
In #133324, two new functionalities were implemented:
* Peeking through unsized -> sized PtrToPtr casts whose operand is `AggregateKind::RawPtr`, to turn it into PtrToPtr casts of the base of the aggregate. In this case, this allows us to see that the value of `_7` is just a ptr-to-ptr cast of `_6`.
* Folding a PtrToPtr cast of an operand which is a Transmute cast into just a single Transmute, which (theoretically) allows us to treat `_7` as a transmute into `*mut ()` of the base of the cast of `_10`, which is the place projection of `((_9.0: std::ptr::Unique<()>).0: std::ptr::NonNull<()>)`.
However, when applying those two subsequent optimizations, we must *not* update the CastKind of the final cast *unless* we also update the operand of the cast, since the operand may no longer make sense with the updated CastKind.
In this case, this is problematic because the type of `_8` is `*const [()]`, but that operand in assignment statement of `_7` does *not* get turned into something like `((_9.0: std::ptr::Unique<()>).0: std::ptr::NonNull<()>)` -- **in other words, `try_to_operand` fails** -- because GVN only turns value nodes into locals or consts, not projections of locals. So we fail to update the operand, but we still update the CastKind to Transmute, which means we now are transmuting types of different sizes (a wide pointer and a thin pointer).
r? `@scottmcm` or `@cjgillot`
Fixes#136361Fixes#135997
