Implement `MappedMutexGuard`, `MappedRwLockReadGuard`, and `MappedRwLockWriteGuard`.
ACP: https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/260
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/117108
<details> <summary> (Outdated) </summary>
`MutexState`/`RwLockState` structs
~~Having `sys::(Mutex|RwLock)` and `poison::Flag` as separate fields in the `Mutex`/`RwLock` would require `MappedMutexGuard`/`MappedRwLockWriteGuard` to hold an additional pointer, so I combined the two fields into a `MutexState`/`RwLockState` struct. This should not noticeably affect perf or layout, but requires an additional field projection when accessing the former `.inner` or `.poison` fields (now `.state.inner` and `.state.poison`).~~ If this is not desired, then `MappedMutexGuard`/`MappedRwLockWriteGuard` can instead hold separate pointers to the two fields.
</details>
The doc-comments are mostly copied from the existing `*Guard` doc-comments, with some parts from `lock_api::Mapped*Guard`'s doc-comments.
Unresolved question: Are more tests needed?
Fix incorrect doc of ScopedJoinHandle::is_finished
Fixes the explanation how to use `is_finished` to achieve a non-blocking join. The updated version matches the documentation of the non-scoped JoinHandle::is_finished.
Fixes the explanation how to use is_finished to achieve a non-blocking
join. The updated version matches the documentation of the non-scoped
JoinHandle::is_finished.
Help with common API confusion, like asking for `push` when the data structure really has `append`.
```
error[E0599]: no method named `size` found for struct `Vec<{integer}>` in the current scope
--> $DIR/rustc_confusables_std_cases.rs:17:7
|
LL | x.size();
| ^^^^
|
help: you might have meant to use `len`
|
LL | x.len();
| ~~~
help: there is a method with a similar name
|
LL | x.resize();
| ~~~~~~
```
#59450
Add manual Sync impl for ReentrantLockGuard
Fixes: #125526
Tracking Issue: #121440
this impl is even shown in the summary in the tracking issue, but apparently was forgotten in the actual implementation
Bump bootstrap compiler to the latest beta compiler
This PR updates the bootstrap compiler, aka stage0 to the latest beta version, since it contains rust-lang/cargo#13925.
It removes those unconditional Cargo warnings:
```
warning: [...]/rust/library/core/Cargo.toml: unused manifest key: lints.rust.unexpected_cfgs.check-cfg
warning: [...]/rust/library/std/Cargo.toml: unused manifest key: lints.rust.unexpected_cfgs.check-cfg
warning: [...]/rust/library/alloc/Cargo.toml: unused manifest key: lints.rust.unexpected_cfgs.check-cfg
```
for all contributors/users of this repository (including CI).
I don't know if that's something we do, or if it's even advisable, feel free to close.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Currently all architecture-specific memchr code is only used in
`std::io`. Most of the actual `memchr` capacity exposed to the user
through the slice API is instead implemented in core::slice::memchr.
Hence this commit deletes memchr from std::sys[_common] and replace
calls to it by calls to core::slice::memchr functions. This deletes
(r)memchr from the list of symbols linked to libc.
Specialize some methods of `io::Chain`
This PR specializes the implementation of some methods of `io::Chain`, which could bring performance improvements when using it.
Reduce monomorphisation bloat in small_c_string
This is a code path usually next to an FFI call, so taking the `dyn` slowdown for the 1159 llvm-line (fat lto, codegen-units 1, release build) drop in my testing program [t2fanrd](https://github.com/GnomedDev/t2fanrd) is worth it imo.
Move `OsStr::slice_encoded_bytes` validation to platform modules
This delegates OS string slicing (`OsStr::slice_encoded_bytes`) validation to the underlying platform implementation. For now that results in increased performance and better error messages on Windows without any changes to semantics. In the future we may want to provide different semantics for different platforms.
The existing implementation is still used on Unix and most other platforms and is now optimized a little better.
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/118485
cc `@epage,` `@BurntSushi`
