At some point it seems `SystemTime::new` changed from returning `SystemTime` to `io::Result<SystemTime>`. This seems to have been addressed on other platforms, but was never changed for AIX.
This was caught by running
```
python3 x.py build --host x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu --target powerpc64-ibm-aix
```
Clean up warnings + `unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn` when building std for armv6k-nintendo-3ds
See #127747
ping `@AzureMarker` `@Meziu`
I could only find one instance needing an extra `unsafe` that was not also shared with many other `unix` targets (presumably these will get covered in larger sweeping changes, I didn't want to introduce churn that would potentially conflict with those). The one codepath I found is shared with `vita` however, so also pinging `@nikarh` `@pheki` `@zetanumbers` just to make sure they're aware of this change.
Also removed one unused import from `process_unsupported` which should simply fix the warning for any target that uses it.
Deal with invalid UTF-8 from `gai_strerror`
When the system is using a non-UTF-8 locale, the value will indeed not be UTF-8. That sucks for everyone involved, but is no reason for panic. We can "handle" this gracefully by just using from lossy, replacing the invalid UTF-8 with � and keeping the accidentally valid UTF-8. Good luck when debugging, but at least it's not a crash.
We already do this for `strerror_r`.
fixes#127563
When the system is using a non-UTF-8 locale, the value will indeed not
be UTF-8. That sucks for everyone involved, but is no reason for panic.
We can "handle" this gracefully by just using from lossy, replacing the
invalid UTF-8 with the ? and keeping the accidentally valid UTF-8.
Good luck when debugging, but at least it's not a crash.
We already do this for `strerror_r`.
Windows: move BSD socket shims to netc
On Windows we need to alter a few types so that they can be used in the cross-platform socket code. Currently these alterations are spread throughout the `c` module with some more in the `netc` module.
Let's gather all our BSD compatibility shims in the `netc` module so it's all in one place and easier to discover.
kmc-solid: `#![forbid(unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn)]`
The path logic _should_ handle the forbiddance in the itron sources correctly, despite them being an "out-of-line" module.
unix: document unsafety for std `sig{action,altstack}`
I found many surprising elements here while trying to wrap a measly 5 functions with `unsafe`. I would rather not "just" mindlessly wrap this code with `unsafe { }`, so I decided to document it properly.
On Unix, this code covers the "create and setup signal handler" part of the stack overflow code, and serves as the primary safety boundary for the signal handler. It is rarely audited, very gnarly, and worth extra attention. It calls other unsafe functions defined in this module, but "can we correctly map the right memory, or find the right address ranges?" are separate questions, and get increasingly platform-specific. The question here is the more general "are we doing everything in the correct order, and setting up the handler in the correct way?"
As part of this audit, I noticed that we do some peculiar things that we should probably refrain from. However, I avoided making changes that I deemed might have a different final result in Rust programs. I did, however, reorder some events so that the signal handler is installed _after_ we install the alternate stack. We do not run much code between these events, but it is probably best if the timespan between the handler being available and the new stack being installed is 0 nanoseconds.
Safely enforce thread name requirements
The requirements for the thread name to be both UTF-8 and null terminated are easily enforced by a wrapper type so lets do that. The fact this used to be just a bare `CString` has tripped me up before because it was entirely safe to use a non UTF-8 `CString`.
Add Process support for UEFI
UEFI does not have an actual process. However, it does provide methods to launch and execute another UEFI image. Having process support is important since it is possible to run rust test suit using `Command::output` and is the first step towards being able to run it for UEFI.
Here is an overview of how the support is implemented.
- We create a copy of the SystemTable. This is required since at least OVMF seems to crash if the original system table is modified.
- Stdout and Stderr pipe works by registering a new `simple_text_output` Protocol and pointing the child system table to use those.
- `Stdio::Inherit` just points the console to the current running image console which seems to work with even 3 levels of process.
- `spawn` is left unimplemented since it does not make sense for UEFI architecture. Additionally, since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/105458 was merged, the `spawn` and `output` implementations are completely independent.
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #127295 (CFI: Support provided methods on traits)
- #127814 (`C-cmse-nonsecure-call`: improved error messages)
- #127949 (fix: explain E0120 better cover cases when its raised)
- #127966 (Use structured suggestions for unconstrained generic parameters on impl blocks)
- #127976 (Lazy type aliases: Diagostics: Detect bivariant ty params that are only used recursively)
- #127978 (Avoid ref when using format! for perf)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Avoid ref when using format! for perf
Clean up a few minor refs in `format!` macro, as it has a performance cost. Apparently the compiler is unable to inline `format!("{}", &variable)`, and does a run-time double-reference instead (format macro already does one level referencing). Inlining format args prevents accidental `&` misuse.
- Update system table crc32
- Fix unsound use of Box
- Free exit data
- Code improvements
- Introduce OwnedTable
- Update r-efi to latest version
- Use extended_varargs_abi_support for
install_multiple_protocol_interfaces and
uninstall_multiple_protocol_interfaces
- Fix comments
- Stub out args implementation
Signed-off-by: Ayush Singh <ayushdevel1325@gmail.com>
`use` declarations will be reformatted in #125443. Very rarely, there is
a desire to force a group of `use` declarations together in a way that
auto-formatting will break up. E.g. when you want a single comment to
apply to a group. #126776 dealt with all of these in the codebase,
ensuring that no comments intended for multiple `use` declarations would
end up in the wrong place. But some people were unhappy with it.
This commit uses `#[rustfmt::skip]` to create these custom `use` groups
in an idiomatic way for a few of the cases changed in #126776. This
works because rustfmt treats any `use` item annotated with
`#[rustfmt::skip]` as a barrier and won't reorder other `use` items
around it.
This is technically "not necessary", as we will "just" segfault instead
if we e.g. arrive inside the handler fn with the null altstack. However,
it seems incorrect to go about this hoping that segfaulting is okay,
seeing as how our purpose here is to mitigate stack overflow problems.
Make sure NEED_ALTSTACK syncs with PAGE_SIZE when we do.
Co-authored-by: Jonas Böttiger <jonasboettiger@icloud.com>
Use ThreadId instead of TLS-address in `ReentrantLock`
Fixes#123458
`ReentrantLock` currently uses the address of a thread local variable as an ID that's unique across all currently running threads. This can lead to uninituitive behavior as in #123458 if TLS blocks get reused. This PR changes `ReentrantLock` to instead use the `ThreadId` provided by `std` as the unique ID. `ThreadId` guarantees uniqueness across the lifetime of the whole process, so we don't need to worry about reusing IDs of terminated threads. The main appeal of this PR is thus the possibility of changing the `ReentrantLock` API to guarantee that if a thread leaks a lock guard, no other thread may ever acquire that lock again.
This does entail some complications:
- previously, the only way to retrieve the current thread ID would've been using `thread::current().id()` which creates a temporary `Arc` and which isn't available in TLS destructors. As part of this PR, the thread ID instead gets cached in its own thread local, as suggested [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123458#issuecomment-2038207704).
- `ThreadId` is always 64-bit whereas the current implementation uses a usize-sized ID. Since this ID needs to be updated atomically, we can't simply use a single atomic variable on 32 bit platforms. Instead, we fall back to using a (sound) seqlock on 32-bit platforms, which works because only one thread at a time can write to the ID. This seqlock is technically susceptible to the ABA problem, but the attack vector to create actual unsoundness has to be very specific:
- You would need to be able to lock+unlock the lock exactly 2^31 times (or a multiple thereof) while a thread trying to lock it sleeps
- The sleeping thread would have to suspend after reading one half of the thread id but before reading the other half
- The teared result from combining the halves of the thread ID would have to exactly line up with the sleeping thread's ID
The risk of this occurring seems slim enough to be acceptable to me, but correct me if I'm wrong. This also means that the size of the lock increases by 8 bytes on 32-bit platforms, but this also shouldn't be an issue.
Performance wise, I did some crude testing of the only case where this could lead to real slowdowns, which is the case of locking a `ReentrantLock` that's already locked by the current thread. On both aarch64 and x86-64, there is (expectedly) pretty much no performance hit. I didn't have any 32-bit platforms to test the seqlock performance on, so I did the next best thing and just forced the 64-bit platforms to use the seqlock implementation. There, the performance degraded by ~1-2ns/(lock+unlock) on x86-64 and ~6-8ns/(lock+unlock) on aarch64, which is measurable but seems acceptable to me seeing as 32-bit platforms should be a small minority anyways.
cc `@joboet` `@RalfJung` `@CAD97`
