Unless `try_trait_v2` is enabled, don't mention that `FromResidual` isn't implemented for a specific type when the implicit `From` conversion of a `?` fails. For the end user on stable, `?` might as well be a compiler intrinsic, so we remove that note to avoid further confusion and allowing other parts of the error to be more prominent.
```
error[E0277]: `?` couldn't convert the error to `u8`
--> $DIR/bad-interconversion.rs:4:20
|
LL | fn result_to_result() -> Result<u64, u8> {
| --------------- expected `u8` because of this
LL | Ok(Err(123_i32)?)
| ------------^ the trait `From<i32>` is not implemented for `u8`
| |
| this can't be annotated with `?` because it has type `Result<_, i32>`
|
= note: the question mark operation (`?`) implicitly performs a conversion on the error value using the `From` trait
= help: the following other types implement trait `From<T>`:
`u8` implements `From<Char>`
`u8` implements `From<bool>`
```
Enforce T: Hash for Interned<...>
This adds panicking Hash impls for several resolver types that don't actually satisfy this condition. It's not obvious to me that rustc_resolve actually upholds the Interned guarantees but fixing that seems pretty hard (the structures have at minimum some interior mutability, so it's not really recursively hashable in place...). FIXME comments as such on those impls.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/137196#issuecomment-2664350287
r? ``@saethlin``
cg_clif: use exclusively ABI alignment
This will minimize possible conflict with future updates to AbiAndPrefAlign that may remove some fields. It is also almost a bug to consider them.
r? ``@bjorn3``
Install more signal stack trace handlers
This PR install the signal stack handler to more signals (`SIGILL`, ~~`SIGTRAP`~~, ~~`SIGABRT`~~, ~~`SIGFPE`~~, `SIGBUS`, ~~`SIGQUIT`~~).
Noticed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/137138 that we didn't print anything for `SIGILL`, so I though we could just handle more signals.
r? `````@workingjubilee````` since you last touched it
- change function parameter order to `cx, ty, ...` to match the other
functions in this file
- use `ct` identifier for `ty::Const` to match the majority of the
compiler codebase
- remove useless return
- bring match arms in a more natural order
Remove the `repr` parameter from the wrappers around `calc.univariant`,
because it's always defaulted. Only ADTs can have a repr and those call
`calc.layout_of_struct_or_enum` and not `calc.univariant`.
- we normalize before calling `layout_of_uncached`, so we don't need to
normalize again later
- we check for type/const errors at the top of `layout_of_uncached`, so
we don't need to check again later
`ty::Placeholder` is used by the trait solver and computing its layout
was necessary, because the `PointerLike` trait used to be automatically
implemented for all types with pointer-like layout.
Nowadays, `PointerLike` requires user-written impls and the trait solver
no longer computes any layouts, so this can be removed.
Unevaluated constants that aren't generic should have caused a const eval
error earlier during normalization.
improve cold_path()
#120370 added a new instrinsic `cold_path()` and used it to fix `likely` and `unlikely`
However, in order to limit scope, the information about cold code paths is only used in 2-target switch instructions. This is sufficient for `likely` and `unlikely`, but limits usefulness of `cold_path` for idiomatic rust. For example, code like this:
```
if let Some(x) = y { ... }
```
may generate 3-target switch:
```
switch y.discriminator:
0 => true branch
1 = > false branch
_ => unreachable
```
and therefore marking a branch as cold will have no effect.
This PR improves `cold_path()` to work with arbitrary switch instructions.
Note that for 2-target switches, we can use `llvm.expect`, but for multiple targets we need to manually emit branch weights. I checked Clang and it also emits weights in this situation. The Clang's weight calculation is more complex that this PR, which I believe is mainly because `switch` in `C/C++` can have multiple cases going to the same target.
Move methods from `Map` to `TyCtxt`, part 2.
Continuing the work started in #136466.
Every method gains a `hir_` prefix, though for the ones that already have a `par_` or `try_par_` prefix I added the `hir_` after that.
r? Zalathar
This adds panicking Hash impls for several resolver types that don't
actually satisfy this condition. It's not obvious to me that
rustc_resolve actually upholds the Interned guarantees but fixing that
seems pretty hard (the structures have at minimum some interior
mutability, so it's not really recursively hashable in place...).
It's currently lacking comments. This commit adds some, which is useful
because there are some methods with non-obvious behaviour.
The commit also renames two things:
- `patch_map` becomes `term_patch_map`, because it's only about
terminators.
- `is_patched` becomes `is_term_patched`, for the same reason.
(I would guess that originally `MirPatch` only handled terminators, and
then over time it expanded to allow other modifications, but these names
weren't updated.)
Instead of `expand_statements`. This makes the code shorter and
consistent with other MIR transform passes.
The tests require updating because there is a slight change in
MIR output:
- the old code replaced the original statement with twelve new
statements.
- the new code inserts converts the original statement to a `nop` and
then insert twelve new statements in front of it.
I.e. we now end up with an extra `nop`, which doesn't matter at all.
Continuing the work started in #136466.
Every method gains a `hir_` prefix, though for the ones that already
have a `par_` or `try_par_` prefix I added the `hir_` after that.
Drop elaboration looks at fields of a type, which may error when we try
to normalize them. Borrowck will have detected this if HIR typeck
didn't, but we don't delete the MIR body for errors in borrowck so
still have to handle this happening in drop elaboration by checking
whether an error has been emitted.
HIR type checking no longer runs dropck, so we may get new errors when
we run it in borrowck. If this happens then rerun the query in a local
infcx and report errors for it.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #137095 (Replace some u64 hashes with Hash64)
- #137100 (HIR analysis: Remove unnecessary abstraction over list of clauses)
- #137105 (Restrict DerefPure for Cow<T> impl to T = impl Clone, [impl Clone], str.)
- #137120 (Enable `relative-path-include-bytes-132203` rustdoc-ui test on Windows)
- #137125 (Re-add missing empty lines in the releases notes)
- #137145 (use add-core-stubs / minicore for a few more tests)
- #137149 (Remove SSE ABI from i586-pc-windows-msvc)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Remove SSE ABI from i586-pc-windows-msvc
As an i586 target, it should not have SSE. This caused the following warning to be emitted:
```
warning: target feature `sse2` must be enabled to ensure that the ABI of the current target can be implemented correctly
|
= note: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
= note: for more information, see issue #116344 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116344>
warning: 1 warning emitted
```
see #116344.
r? RalfJung
HIR analysis: Remove unnecessary abstraction over list of clauses
`rustc_hir_analysis::bounds::Bounds` with its methods is nowadays a paper-thin wrapper around `Vec<(Clause, Span)>`s and `Vec::push` essentially.
Its existence slightly annoyed me (and I keep opening its corresp. file instead of the identically named `bounds.rs` in `hir_ty_lowering/` that I actually want most of the time :P).
Opening to check if you agree with inlining it.
r? compiler-errors or reassign
