fix ICE on type error in promoted
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/133968
Ensure that when we turn a type error into a "this promoted failed to evaluate" error, we do record this as something that may happen even in "infallible" promoteds.
coverage: Prefer to visit nodes whose predecessors have been visited
In coverage instrumentation, we need to traverse the control-flow graph and decide what kind of counter (physical counter or counter-expression) should be used for each node that needs a counter.
The existing traversal order is complex and hard to tweak. This new traversal order tries to be a bit more principled, by always preferring to visit nodes whose predecessors have already been visited, which is a good match for how the counter-creation code ends up dealing with a node's in-edges and out-edges.
For several of the coverage tests, this ends up being a strict improvement in reducing the size of the coverage metadata, and also reducing the number of physical counters needed.
(The new traversal should hopefully also allow some further code simplifications in the future.)
---
This is made possible by the separate simplification pass introduced by #133849. Without that, almost any change to the traversal order ends up increasing the size of the expression table or the number of physical counters.
Lint on combining `#[no_mangle]` and `#[export_name]`
This is my very first contribution to the compiler, even though I read the [chapter about lints](https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/diagnostics.html) I'm not very certain that this ~~new lint is done right as a builtin lint~~ PR is right. I appreciate any guidance on how to improve the code.
- Add test for issue #47446
- ~~Implement the new lint `mixed_export_name_and_no_mangle` as a builtin lint (not sure if that is the right way to go)~~ Extend `unused_attributes` lint
- Add suggestion how to fix it
<details>
<summary>Old proposed new lint</summary>
> The `mixed_export_name_and_no_mangle` lint detects usage of both `#[export_name]` and `#[no_mangle]` on the same item which results on `#[no_mangle]` being ignored.
>
> *warn-by-default*
>
> ### Example
>
> ```rust
> #[no_mangle] // ignored
> #[export_name = "foo"] // takes precedences
> pub fn bar() {}
> ```
>
> ### Explanation
>
> The compiler will not respect the `#[no_mangle]` attribute when generating the symbol name for the function, as the `#[export_name]` attribute takes precedence. This can lead to confusion and is unnecessary.
</details>
In most places, the `early` method is listed before the corresponding
`primary` method, like you'd expect. This commit fixes two places where
that isn't the case.
The words "before" and "after" have an obvious temporal meaning, e.g.
`seek_before_primary_effect`,
`visit_statement_{before,after}_primary_effect`. But "before" is also
used to name the effect that occurs before the primary effect of a
statement/terminator; this is `Effect::Before`. This leads to the
confusing possibility of talking about things happening "before/after
the before event".
This commit removes this awkward overloading of "before" by renaming
`Effect::Before` as `Effect::Early`. It also renames some of the
`Analysis` and `ResultsVisitor` methods to be more consistent.
Here are the before and after names:
- `Effect::{Before,Primary}` -> `Effect::{Early,Primary}`
- `apply_before_statement_effect` -> `apply_early_statement_effect`
- `apply_statement_effect` -> `apply_primary_statement_effect`
- `visit_statement_before_primary_effect` -> `visit_after_early_statement_effect`
- `visit_statement_after_primary_effect` -> `visit_after_primary_statement_effect`
(And s/statement/terminator/ for all the terminator events.)
It uses `MaybeInitializedPlaces` and `MaybeUninitializedPlaces`, but
calls the results `live` and `dead`. This is very confusing given that
there are also analyses called `MaybeLiveLocals` and `MaybeStorageLive`
and `MaybeStorageDead`.
This commit changes it to use `maybe_init` and `maybe_uninit`.
Currently they are called (most common) `state`, or `trans`, or (rare)
`on_entry`. I think `trans` is short for "transfer function", which
perhaps made more sense when `GenKillAnalysis` existed. Using `state`
everywhere now is more consistent.
They are only present because it's currently defined in terms of the
domains of `Borrows` and `MaybeUninitializedPlaces` and
`EverInitializedPlaces` via associated types. This commit introduces
typedefs for those domains, avoiding the lifetimes.
Introduce `default_field_values` feature
Initial implementation of `#[feature(default_field_values]`, proposed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3681.
We now parse const expressions after a `=` in a field definition, to specify a `struct` field default value.
We now allow `Struct { field, .. }` where there's no base after `..`.
`#[derive(Default)]` now uses the default value if present, continuing to use `Default::default()` if not.
```rust
#[derive(Debug)]
pub struct S;
#[derive(Debug, Default)]
pub struct Foo {
pub bar: S = S,
pub baz: i32 = 42 + 3,
}
fn main () {
let x = Foo { .. };
let y = Foo::default();
let z = Foo { baz: 1, .. };
assert_eq!(45, x.baz);
assert_eq!(45, y.baz);
assert_eq!(1, z.baz);
}
```
interpret: clean up deduplicating allocation functions
The "align" and "kind" arguments would be largely ignored in the "dedup" case, so let's move that to entirely separate function.
Let's also remove support for old-style miri_resolve_frame while we are at it. The docs have already said for a while that this must be set to 1.
Add test to check unicode identifier version
This adds a test to verify which version of Unicode is used for identifiers. This is part of the language, documented at https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/identifiers.html#r-ident.unicode. The version here often changes implicitly due to dependency updates pulling in new versions, and thus we often don't notice it has changed leaving the documentation out of date. The intent here is to have a canary to give us a notification when it changes so that we can update the documentation.
Initial implementation of `#[feature(default_field_values]`, proposed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3681.
Support default fields in enum struct variant
Allow default values in an enum struct variant definition:
```rust
pub enum Bar {
Foo {
bar: S = S,
baz: i32 = 42 + 3,
}
}
```
Allow using `..` without a base on an enum struct variant
```rust
Bar::Foo { .. }
```
`#[derive(Default)]` doesn't account for these as it is still gating `#[default]` only being allowed on unit variants.
Support `#[derive(Default)]` on enum struct variants with all defaulted fields
```rust
pub enum Bar {
#[default]
Foo {
bar: S = S,
baz: i32 = 42 + 3,
}
}
```
Check for missing fields in typeck instead of mir_build.
Expand test with `const` param case (needs `generic_const_exprs` enabled).
Properly instantiate MIR const
The following works:
```rust
struct S<A> {
a: Vec<A> = Vec::new(),
}
S::<i32> { .. }
```
Add lint for default fields that will always fail const-eval
We *allow* this to happen for API writers that might want to rely on users'
getting a compile error when using the default field, different to the error
that they would get when the field isn't default. We could change this to
*always* error instead of being a lint, if we wanted.
This will *not* catch errors for partially evaluated consts, like when the
expression relies on a const parameter.
Suggestions when encountering `Foo { .. }` without `#[feature(default_field_values)]`:
- Suggest adding a base expression if there are missing fields.
- Suggest enabling the feature if all the missing fields have optional values.
- Suggest removing `..` if there are no missing fields.
Revert #131669 due to ICEs
Revert [lint: change help for pointers to dyn types in FFI #131669](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/131669) due to ICE reports:
- <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/134059> (real-world)
- <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/134060> (fuzzing)
Closes#134060.
The revert criteria I used to assess whether to post this revert was:
1. It's not trivial to fix-forward. (1) The implementation itself is tricky due to `tcx.is_sized` query not being very trivial. (2) It will need more extensive test coverage for different ty kinds.
2. It is impacting real-world crates, i.e. #134059.
3. `improper_ctypes_definitions` is a warn-by-default lint.
This revert is without prejudice to relanding the changes. The changes can be re-landed with those cases addressed and stronger test coverage.
A rough regression test corresponding to the fuzzed example reported in #134060 is added to check that the revert worked, it is not sufficient for the lint test coverage when the lint improvements are to be relanded. Please feel free to improve the test in the reland.
r? `@workingjubilee` (or compiler)
cc `@niacdoial` (PR author)
The part about zero-sized structures is totally wrong. The rest of
it has almost no explanatory value; there are better explanations in
comments elsewhere.
Introduce `MixedBitSet`
`ChunkedBitSet` is good at avoiding excessive memory usage for programs with very large functgions where dataflow bitsets have very large domain sizes. But it's overly heavyweight for small bitsets, because any non-empty `ChunkedBitSet` takes up at least 256 bytes.
This PR introduces `MixedBitSet`, which is a simple bitset that uses `BitSet` for small/medium bitsets and `ChunkedBitSet` for large bitsets. It's a speed and memory usage win.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
A bunch of cleanups
These are all extracted from a branch I have to get rid of driver queries. Most of the commits are not directly necessary for this, but were found in the process of implementing the removal of driver queries.
Previous PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/132410
A `ChunkedBitSet` has to be at least 2048 bits for it to outperform a
`BitSet`, because that's the chunk size. The largest `SparseBitMatrix`
encountered when compiling the compiler and the entire rustc-perf
benchmark suite is less than 600 bits.
This change is a tiny perf win, but the motivation is more about
avoiding uses of `ChunkedBitSet` outside of `MixedBitSet`.
The test change is necessary to avoid hitting the `<BitSet<T> as
BitRelations<ChunkedBitSet<T>>>::subtract` method that has
`unimplemented!` in its body and isn't otherwise used.
