The loop that writes the keys in each section of bootstrap.toml
accumulates all the commented lines before a given key and emits them
when it reaches the next key in the section. This ends up dropping
lines accumulated for the last key
Do not suggest borrow that is already there in fully-qualified call
When encountering `&str::from("value")` do not suggest `&&str::from("value")`.
Fix#132041.
I was reading over this documentation in light of the effort to enlist
more maintainers for Tier 2 targets and figured it was time for a
refresh of this documentation now that historical renames/etc have all
become a thing of the past. No new major changes to this documentation,
mostly just wanted to update it and reflect the modern status quo for
this target.
Allow custom default address spaces and parse `p-` specifications in the datalayout string
Some targets, such as CHERI, use as default an address space different from the "normal" default address space `0` (in the case of CHERI, [200 is used](https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/techreports/UCAM-CL-TR-877.pdf)). Currently, `rustc` does not allow to specify custom address spaces and does not take into consideration [`p-` specifications in the datalayout string](https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#langref-datalayout).
This patch tries to mitigate these problems by allowing targets to define a custom default address space (while keeping the default value to address space `0`) and adding the code to parse the `p-` specifications in `rustc_abi`. The main changes are that `TargetDataLayout` now uses functions to refer to pointer-related informations, instead of having specific fields for the size and alignment of pointers in the default address space; furthermore, the two `pointer_size` and `pointer_align` fields in `TargetDataLayout` are replaced with an `FxHashMap` that holds info for all the possible address spaces, as parsed by the `p-` specifications.
The potential performance drawbacks of not having ad-hoc fields for the default address space will be tested in this PR's CI run.
r? workingjubilee
Allow custom default address spaces and parse `p-` specifications in the datalayout string
Some targets, such as CHERI, use as default an address space different from the "normal" default address space `0` (in the case of CHERI, [200 is used](https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/techreports/UCAM-CL-TR-877.pdf)). Currently, `rustc` does not allow to specify custom address spaces and does not take into consideration [`p-` specifications in the datalayout string](https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#langref-datalayout).
This patch tries to mitigate these problems by allowing targets to define a custom default address space (while keeping the default value to address space `0`) and adding the code to parse the `p-` specifications in `rustc_abi`. The main changes are that `TargetDataLayout` now uses functions to refer to pointer-related informations, instead of having specific fields for the size and alignment of pointers in the default address space; furthermore, the two `pointer_size` and `pointer_align` fields in `TargetDataLayout` are replaced with an `FxHashMap` that holds info for all the possible address spaces, as parsed by the `p-` specifications.
The potential performance drawbacks of not having ad-hoc fields for the default address space will be tested in this PR's CI run.
r? workingjubilee
The endianness can change the test expectation for the enum check.
This change is fixing the failing tests on big endian by changing
the tests so that they behave the same as on little endian.
Disable download-rustc for library profile
The feature currently completely breaks `x test` (rust-lang/rust#142505), core functionality of working on the standard library. Therefore it should be disabled by default until that problem is fixed. Having to wait a bit longer for a check build is nothing compared to completely mysterious build errors when testing.
compiler: Deduplicate `must_emit_unwind_tables()` comments
There is one comment at a call site and one comment in the function definition that are mostly saying the same thing. Fold the call site comment into the function definition comment to reduce duplication.
There are actually some inaccuracies in the comments but let's deduplicate before we address the inaccuracies.
mbe: Refactors and function extractions in `compile_declarative_macro`
These refactors help pave the way for parsing attribute rules.
Best reviewed commit-by-commit.
- **mbe: Simplify compile_declarative_macro by factoring out some variables**
- **mbe: Factor out a helper to check an LHS**
- **mbe: Factor out a helper to check for unexpected EOF in definition**
- **mbe: Clarify comments about error handling in `compile_declarative_macro`**
Dont resolve instance of root in `mir_callgraph_cyclic`
`Instance::try_resolve` on a default trait body method will always fail, since it's still possible to further substitute. This leads to a cycle, since in `tests/mir-opt/inline_default_trait_body.rs`, both `Trait::a` and `Trait::b` need to consider the other to be cyclical, but since we couldn't resolve a body, we'd just consider *nothing* to be cyclical.
The root instance we care about when computing `mir_callgraph_cyclic` is trivial to compute (it's just `InstanceKind::Item`), so just replace it with a call to `Instance::new_raw`.
r? `@cjgillot` `@oli-obk`
Fixesrust-lang/rust#143534
interpret: rename StackPopCleanup
The name `StackPopCleanup` stopped making sense a long time ago IMO -- in the common case, it has nothing to do with "cleanup", and everything with where the program should jump next. If we didn't have unwinding this would be just the return block, but given that we do have unwinding I figured maybe "continuation" would be a good name. This comes up in [continuation-passing style](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuation-passing_style) and refers to where the program will *continue* when a function is done. So from a PL perspective it is the most fitting term I think -- but it may be too jargony.
r? `@oli-obk` what do you think?
Move `stable_mir` back to its own crate
We've finished the refactoring, so it's time to move `stable_mir` back to its own crate.
This PR leaves an empty `rustc_internal` module with a `#[deprecated]` attribute in `rustc_smir` to let users know we just moved it to `stable_mir`.
Fix short linker error output
This PR does 2 things:
- It removes the braces when there's a single element. This is required since brace expansion (at least in bash and zsh) only triggers if there's at least 2 elements.
- It removes the extra `.rlib` suffixes of the elements. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/135707#discussion_r2185212393 for context.
Running `cargo +stage1 build` on the following program:
```rust
unsafe extern "C" {
fn foo() -> libc::c_int;
}
fn main() {
let x = unsafe { foo() } as u32;
// println!("{}", data_encoding::BASE64.encode(&x.to_le_bytes()));
}
```
Gives the following diff before and after the PR:
```diff
-/tmp/foo/target/debug/deps/{liblibc-faf416f178830595.rlib}.rlib
+/tmp/foo/target/debug/deps/liblibc-faf416f178830595.rlib
```
Running on the same program with the additional dependency, we get the following diff:
```diff
-/tmp/foo/target/debug/deps/{liblibc-faf416f178830595.rlib,libdata_encoding-84bb5aadfa9e8839.rlib}.rlib
+/tmp/foo/target/debug/deps/{liblibc-faf416f178830595,libdata_encoding-84bb5aadfa9e8839}.rlib
```
Get rid of build-powerpc64le-toolchain.sh
The dist-powerpc64le-linux-musl runner never actually used the toolchain that the script produced, it instead used the one from crosstool-ng.
The dist-powerpc64le-linux-gnu runner did use it, from what I can tell mainly to get a glibc 2.17 version with ppc64le support backported. Since crosstool-ng has the necessary patches, we can just use crosstool-ng to get an appropriate toolchain. While at it, use kernel 3.10 headers since that's the version documented in platform support for this target.
try-job: dist-powerpc64le-linux-gnu
try-job: dist-powerpc64le-linux-musl
