Fix a mix-up of a block with its predecessors in handling of SwitchInt
edge effects for backward analysis. Note that this functionality is
currently unused, so change has no practical impact.
Make UB transmutes really UB in LLVM
Ralf suggested in <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/143410#discussion_r2184928123> that UB transmutes shouldn't be trapping, which happened for the one path *that* PR was changing, but there's another path as well, so *this* PR changes that other path to match.
r? codegen
fix: Include frontmatter in -Zunpretty output
In the implementation (rust-lang/rust#140035), this was left as an open question for
the tracking issue (rust-lang/rust#136889). My assumption is that this should be
carried over.
The test was carried over from rust-lang/rust#137193 which was superseded by rust-lang/rust#140035.
Thankfully, either way, `-Zunpretty` is unstable and we can always
change it even if we stabilize frontmatter.
chore: Improve how the other suggestions message gets rendered
Note: This change is part of my ongoing work to use `annotate-snippets` as `rustc`'s emitter
This change started as a way to remove some specialty code paths from `annotate-snippets`, by making the "and {} other candidates" message get rendered like a secondary message with no level, but turned into a fix for the message's Unicode output. Before this change, when using the Unicode output, the other suggestions message would get rendered outside of the main suggestion block, making it feel disconnected from what it was referring to. This change makes it so that the message is on the last line of the block, aligning its rendering with other secondary messages, and making it clear what the message is referring to.
Before:
```
error[E0433]: failed to resolve: use of undeclared type `IntoIter`
╭▸ $DIR/issue-82956.rs:28:24
│
LL │ let mut iter = IntoIter::new(self);
│ ━━━━━━━━ use of undeclared type `IntoIter`
╰╴
help: consider importing one of these structs
╭╴
LL + use std::array::IntoIter;
├╴
LL + use std::collections::binary_heap::IntoIter;
├╴
LL + use std::collections::btree_map::IntoIter;
├╴
LL + use std::collections::btree_set::IntoIter;
╰╴
and 9 other candidates
```
After:
```
error[E0433]: failed to resolve: use of undeclared type `IntoIter`
╭▸ $DIR/issue-82956.rs:28:24
│
LL │ let mut iter = IntoIter::new(self);
│ ━━━━━━━━ use of undeclared type `IntoIter`
╰╴
help: consider importing one of these structs
╭╴
LL + use std::array::IntoIter;
├╴
LL + use std::collections::binary_heap::IntoIter;
├╴
LL + use std::collections::btree_map::IntoIter;
├╴
LL + use std::collections::btree_set::IntoIter;
│
╰ and 9 other candidates
```
`tests/ui`: A New Order [28/28] FINAL PART
> [!NOTE]
>
> Intermediate commits are intended to help review, but will be squashed prior to merge.
Some `tests/ui/` housekeeping, to trim down number of tests directly under `tests/ui/`. Part of rust-lang/rust#133895.
r? ``@tgross35``
`tests/ui`: A New Order [27/N]
> [!NOTE]
>
> Intermediate commits are intended to help review, but will be squashed prior to merge.
Some `tests/ui/` housekeeping, to trim down number of tests directly under `tests/ui/`. Part of rust-lang/rust#133895.
r? ``@tgross35``
rust: library: Add `setsid` method to `CommandExt` trait
Add a setsid method to the CommandExt trait so that callers can create a process in a new session and process group whilst still using the POSIX spawn fast path.
Tracking issue: rust-lang/rust#105376
ACP: https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/184
This PR was previously submitted by ``@HarveyHunt`` (whom I marked as Co-Author in the commit message) in rust-lang/rust#105377. However that PR went stale.
I applied the [suggestion](231d19fcbf (r1893457943)) to change the function signature to `fn setsid(&mut self, setsid: bool) -> &mut Command`.
Properly track the depth when expanding free alias types
Decrease the depth after the fold so as not to affect the depth for unrelated same-level constituent types. My bad.
Fixesrust-lang/rust#142419.
Rework borrowing suggestions to use `Expr` instead of just `Span`
In the suggestion machinery for borrowing expressions and types, always use the available obligation `Span` to find the appropriate `Expr` to perform appropriateness checks no the `ExprKind` instead of on the textual snippet corresponding to the `Span`. (We were already doing this, but only for a subset of cases.) This now better handles situations where parentheses and `<>` are needed for correct syntax (`&(foo + bar)`, `(&foo).bar()`, `<&Foo>::bar()`, etc.).
Unify the logic for the case where `&` *and* `&mut` are appropriate with the logic for only one of those cases. (Instead of having two branches for emitting the suggestion, we now have a single one, using `Diag::multipart_suggestions` always.)
Handle the case when `S::foo()` should have been `<&S>::foo()` (instead of suggesting the prior `&S::foo()`. Fixrust-lang/rust#143393.
Make `Diag::multipart_suggestions` always verbose. CC rust-lang/rust#141973.
Resolve refactor: extraction of `finalize_module_binding` and `single_import_can_define_name`
This pr the work Vadim asked for in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/142547#issuecomment-3001339385. This part:
> finalize_module_binding/single_import_can_define_name extraction
Cherry-picked commits of b-naber. Extraction of 2 processes in `resolve_ident_in_module_unadjusted`:
- `finalize_module_binding`
- `single_import_can_define_name`
r? ```@petrochenkov```
Make some "safe" llvm ops actually sound
Noticed while doing other refactorings
it may cause some extra unnecessary allocations, but the current use sites are rare ones anyway
Fix `--skip-std-check-if-no-download-rustc`
Since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/143048, we now explicitly set the build compiler for `check::Std`, which caused it to be built before we checked `--skip-std-check-if-no-download-rustc`. So I moved the check earlier to `make_run`, which resolves it.
I also added a regression test for this. Sadly we can't really test for the positive case easily (when download-ci-rustc is enabled), but we can test the negative cases, where it is disabled.
Fixes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/143705
r? ```@RalfJung```
Add an aarch64-msvc build running on ARM64 Windows
Resurrecting rust-lang/rust#126341
Per <https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3817> we intend to promote `aarch64-pc-windows-msvc` to Tier 1. As part of that work, we are adding a pre-merge CI job to validate that changes do not break this target.
Additionally, for consistency, the `dist-aarch64-msvc` job will also be run on Arm64 Windows runners.
r? ``@Kobzol``
try-job: `*aarch64-msvc*`
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#143446 (use `--dynamic-list` for exporting executable symbols)
- rust-lang/rust#143590 (Fix weird rustdoc output when single and glob reexport conflict on a name)
- rust-lang/rust#143599 (emit `.att_syntax` when global/naked asm use that option)
- rust-lang/rust#143615 (Fix handling of no_std targets in `doc::Std` step)
- rust-lang/rust#143632 (fix: correct parameter names in LLVMRustBuildMinNum and LLVMRustBuildMaxNum FFI declarations)
- rust-lang/rust#143640 (Constify `Fn*` traits)
- rust-lang/rust#143651 (Win: Use exceptions with empty data for SEH panic exception copies instead of a new panic)
- rust-lang/rust#143660 (Disable docs for `compiler-builtins` and `sysroot`)
- rust-lang/rust#143665 ([rustdoc-json] Add tests for `#[doc(hidden)]` handling of items.)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
[rustdoc-json] Add tests for `#[doc(hidden)]` handling of items.
Add tests which check:
- `#[doc(hidden)]` items are not present in rustdoc JSON output by default.
- Invoking rustdoc with `--document-hidden-items` makes `#[doc(hidden)]` items appear, and they show their `#[doc(hidden)]` status appropriately.
r? `@aDotInTheVoid`
Disable docs for `compiler-builtins` and `sysroot`
Bootstrap already had a manual doc filter for the `sysroot` crate, but
other library crates keep themselves out of the public docs by setting
`[lib] doc = false` in their manifest. This seems like a better solution
to hide `compiler-builtins` docs, and removes the `sysroot` hack too.
Fixesrust-lang/rust#143215 (after backport)
```@rustbot``` label beta-nominated
Win: Use exceptions with empty data for SEH panic exception copies instead of a new panic
For unwinding with SEH, we currently construct a C++ exception with the panic data. Being a regular C++ exception, it interacts with the C++ exception handling machinery and can be retrieved via `std::current_exception`, which needs to copy the exception. We can't support that, so we panic, which throws another exception, which the C++ runtime tries to copy and store into the exception_ptr, which panics again, which causes the C++ runtime to store a `bad_exception` instance.
However, this doesn't work because the panics thrown by the copy function will be dropped without being rethrown, and causes unnecessary log spam in stderr. Fix this by directly throwing an exception without data, which doesn't cause log spam and can be dropped without being rethrown.
Fixesrust-lang/rust#143623.
This also happens to be the solution ``@dpaoliello`` suggested, though I'm not sure how to handle the commit credit attribution.
Constify `Fn*` traits
r? `@compiler-errors` `@fee1-dead`
this should unlock a few things. A few `const_closures` tests have broken even more than before, but that feature is marked as incomplete anyway
cc rust-lang/rust#67792
Fix handling of no_std targets in `doc::Std` step
The previous logic was wrong for no_std targets, it just didn't do anything. The logic was added there because by default, the `Std` step would otherwise have a list of all std crates to check, but these would fail for no_std targets. What has to happen instead is to select the default set of packages to check/doc/build, which currently happens in the `std_cargo` function, but the `self.crates` list was overriding that.
In general, using `crates: Vec<String>` in the `Std` steps is quite fishy, because it's difficult to distinguish between all crates (either they are all enumerated or `crates` is empty) and the default (e.g. `x <kind> [library]`) vs a subset (e.g. `x <kind> core`). I wanted to improve that using an enum that would distinguish these situations, avoid passing `-p` for all of the crates explicitly, and unify the selection of packages to compile/check/... in `std_cargo`, based on this enum.
However, I found out from some other bootstrap comments that when you pass `-p` explicitly for all crates, cargo behaves differently (apparently for check it will also check targets/examples etc. with `-p`, but not without it). Furthermore, the doc step has a special case where it does not document the `sysroot` package. So as usually, unifying this logic would get into some edge cases... So instead I opted for a seemingly simpler solution, where I try to prefilter only two allowed crates (core and alloc) for no_std targets in the `std_crates_for_run_make` function.
It's not perfect, but I think it's better than the status quo (words to live by when working on bootstrap...).
Fixes [this Zulip topic](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/326414-t-infra.2Fbootstrap/topic/docs.20for.20non-host.20targets.3F).
r? `@jieyouxu`
emit `.att_syntax` when global/naked asm use that option
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/143542
LLVM would error when using `-Cllvm-args=-x86-asm-syntax=intel` in combination with global/naked assembly with `att_syntax`. It turns out that for LLVM you do in this case need to emit `.att_syntax`.
r? `@Amanieu`
