Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ralf Jung
686eeb83e9 honor rustc_const_stable_indirect in non-staged_api crate with -Zforce-unstable-if-unmarked 2024-11-10 10:01:27 +01:00
lcnr
aab149b58c ConstCx stop using ParamEnv::reveal 2024-10-31 12:43:22 +01:00
Ralf Jung
8849ac6042 tcx.is_const_fn doesn't work the way it is described, remove it
Then we can rename the _raw functions to drop their suffix, and instead
explicitly use is_stable_const_fn for the few cases where that is really what
you want.
2024-10-25 20:52:39 +02:00
Ralf Jung
a0215d8e46 Re-do recursive const stability checks
Fundamentally, we have *three* disjoint categories of functions:
1. const-stable functions
2. private/unstable functions that are meant to be callable from const-stable functions
3. functions that can make use of unstable const features

This PR implements the following system:
- `#[rustc_const_stable]` puts functions in the first category. It may only be applied to `#[stable]` functions.
- `#[rustc_const_unstable]` by default puts functions in the third category. The new attribute `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` can be added to such a function to move it into the second category.
- `const fn` without a const stability marker are in the second category if they are still unstable. They automatically inherit the feature gate for regular calls, it can now also be used for const-calls.

Also, several holes in recursive const stability checking are being closed.
There's still one potential hole that is hard to avoid, which is when MIR
building automatically inserts calls to a particular function in stable
functions -- which happens in the panic machinery. Those need to *not* be
`rustc_const_unstable` (or manually get a `rustc_const_stable_indirect`) to be
sure they follow recursive const stability. But that's a fairly rare and special
case so IMO it's fine.

The net effect of this is that a `#[unstable]` or unmarked function can be
constified simply by marking it as `const fn`, and it will then be
const-callable from stable `const fn` and subject to recursive const stability
requirements. If it is publicly reachable (which implies it cannot be unmarked),
it will be const-unstable under the same feature gate. Only if the function ever
becomes `#[stable]` does it need a `#[rustc_const_unstable]` or
`#[rustc_const_stable]` marker to decide if this should also imply
const-stability.

Adding `#[rustc_const_unstable]` is only needed for (a) functions that need to
use unstable const lang features (including intrinsics), or (b) `#[stable]`
functions that are not yet intended to be const-stable. Adding
`#[rustc_const_stable]` is only needed for functions that are actually meant to
be directly callable from stable const code. `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` is
used to mark intrinsics as const-callable and for `#[rustc_const_unstable]`
functions that are actually called from other, exposed-on-stable `const fn`. No
other attributes are required.
2024-10-25 20:31:40 +02:00
Ralf Jung
ad3991d303 nightly feature tracking: get rid of the per-feature bool fields 2024-10-23 09:14:41 +01:00
Nicholas Nethercote
84ac80f192 Reformat use declarations.
The previous commit updated `rustfmt.toml` appropriately. This commit is
the outcome of running `x fmt --all` with the new formatting options.
2024-07-29 08:26:52 +10:00
Oli Scherer
7ba82d61eb Use a dedicated type instead of a reference for the diagnostic context
This paves the way for tracking more state (e.g. error tainting) in the diagnostic context handle
2024-06-18 15:42:11 +00:00
Jubilee Young
87048a46fc compiler: unnest rustc_const_eval::check_consts 2024-05-24 09:56:56 -07:00