Commit Graph

543 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Guillaume Gomez
980a4a725e Rollup merge of #85817 - r00ster91:patch-9, r=dtolnay
Fix a typo

See also: #85737
2021-05-30 21:06:52 +02:00
r00ster
8d70f40b31 Fix a typo 2021-05-30 00:06:27 +02:00
The8472
f72c60a39a Revert "Auto merge of #83770 - the8472:tra-extend, r=Mark-Simulacrum"
Due to a performance regression that didn't show up in the original perf run
this reverts commit 9111b8ae97, reversing
changes made to 9a700d2947.
2021-05-27 18:17:09 +02:00
bors
ea78d1edf3 Auto merge of #85737 - scottmcm:vec-calloc-option-nonzero, r=m-ou-se
Enable Vec's calloc optimization for Option<NonZero>

Someone on discord noticed that `vec![None::<NonZeroU32>; N]` wasn't getting the optimization, so here's a PR 🙃

We can certainly do this in the standard library because we know for sure this is ok, but I think it's also a necessary consequence of documented guarantees like those in https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/option/#representation and https://doc.rust-lang.org/core/num/struct.NonZeroU32.html

It feels weird to do this without adding a test, but I wasn't sure where that would belong.  Is it worth adding codegen tests for these?
2021-05-27 13:05:57 +00:00
Scott McMurray
04d34a97d1 Enable Vec's calloc optimization for Option<NonZero> 2021-05-26 23:19:35 -07:00
bors
9111b8ae97 Auto merge of #83770 - the8472:tra-extend, r=Mark-Simulacrum
Add `TrustedRandomAccess` specialization for `Vec::extend()`

This should do roughly the same as the `TrustedLen` specialization but result in less IR by using `__iterator_get_unchecked`
instead of `Iterator::for_each`

Conflicting specializations are manually prioritized by grouping them under yet another helper trait.
2021-05-26 19:22:31 +00:00
Deadbeef
3870e8a31d Document From impls for cow.rs 2021-05-26 14:21:44 +00:00
Giacomo Stevanato
e0c9719672 Avoid a double drop in Vec::dedup if a destructor panics 2021-05-24 12:41:13 +02:00
The8472
39e492a2be mark internal inplace_iteration traits as hidden 2021-05-16 19:36:21 +02:00
John Ericson
19be438cda alloc: Add unstable Cfg feature no-global_oom_handling
For certain sorts of systems, programming, it's deemed essential that
all allocation failures be explicitly handled where they occur. For
example, see Linus Torvald's opinion in [1]. Merely not calling global
panic handlers, or always `try_reserving` first (for vectors), is not
deemed good enough, because the mere presence of the global OOM handlers
is burdens static analysis.

One option for these projects to use rust would just be to skip `alloc`,
rolling their own allocation abstractions.  But this would, in my
opinion be a real shame. `alloc` has a few `try_*` methods already, and
we could easily have more. Features like custom allocator support also
demonstrate and existing to support diverse use-cases with the same
abstractions.

A natural way to add such a feature flag would a Cargo feature, but
there are currently uncertainties around how std library crate's Cargo
features may or not be stable, so to avoid any risk of stabilizing by
mistake we are going with a more low-level "raw cfg" token, which
cannot be interacted with via Cargo alone.

Note also that since there is no notion of "default cfg tokens" outside
of Cargo features, we have to invert the condition from
`global_oom_handling` to to `not(no_global_oom_handling)`. This breaks
the monotonicity that would be important for a Cargo feature (i.e.
turning on more features should never break compatibility), but it
doesn't matter for raw cfg tokens which are not intended to be
"constraint solved" by Cargo or anything else.

To support this use-case we create a new feature, "global-oom-handling",
on by default, and put the global OOM handler infra and everything else
it that depends on it behind it. By default, nothing is changed, but
users concerned about global handling can make sure it is disabled, and
be confident that all OOM handling is local and explicit.

For this first iteration, non-flat collections are outright disabled.
`Vec` and `String` don't yet have `try_*` allocation methods, but are
kept anyways since they can be oom-safely created "from parts", and we
hope to add those `try_` methods in the future.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wh_sNLoz84AUUzuqXEsYH35u=8HV3vK-jbRbJ_B-JjGrg@mail.gmail.com/
2021-05-05 16:49:04 -04:00
Amanieu d'Antras
22951b7f56 Stabilize vec_extend_from_within 2021-04-28 07:27:06 +01:00
Caleb Sander
f505d619c4 Remove duplicated fn(Box<[T]>) -> Vec<T> 2021-04-21 23:32:10 -04:00
Waffle Lapkin
3ecaf57b29 Slightly change wording and fix typo in vec/mod.rs 2021-04-18 12:32:10 +03:00
Ivan Tham
eeac70c567 Merge same condition branch in vec spec_extend 2021-04-15 11:58:02 +08:00
Guillaume Gomez
b89c464bed Improve code example for length comparison 2021-04-12 19:59:52 +02:00
The8472
020287516b add TrustedRandomAccess specialization to vec::extend
This should do roughly the same as the TrustedLen specialization
but result in less IR by using __iterator_get_unchecked
instead of iterator.for_each.
2021-04-08 20:30:27 +02:00
Dylan DPC
542f441d44 Rollup merge of #83629 - the8472:fix-inplace-panic-on-drop, r=m-ou-se
Fix double-drop in `Vec::from_iter(vec.into_iter())` specialization when items drop during panic

This fixes the double-drop but it leaves a behavioral difference compared to the default implementation intact: In the default implementation the source and the destination vec are separate objects, so they get dropped separately. Here they share an allocation and the latter only exists as a pointer into the former. So if dropping the former panics then this fix will leak more items than the default implementation would. Is this acceptable or should the specialization also mimic the default implementation's drops-during-panic behavior?

Fixes #83618

`@rustbot` label T-libs-impl
2021-04-02 19:57:31 +02:00
The8472
ad3a791e2a panic early when TrustedLen indicates a length > usize::MAX 2021-03-31 23:09:28 +02:00
The8472
421f5d282a fix double-drop in in-place collect specialization 2021-03-29 04:48:13 +02:00
bors
0239876020 Auto merge of #83582 - jyn514:might-not, r=joshtriplett
may not -> might not

may not -> might not

"may not" has two possible meanings:
1. A command: "You may not stay up past your bedtime."
2. A fact that's only sometimes true: "Some cities may not have bike lanes."

In some cases, the meaning is ambiguous: "Some cars may not have snow
tires." (do the cars *happen* to not have snow tires, or is it
physically impossible for them to have snow tires?)

This changes places where the standard library uses the "description of
fact" meaning to say "might not" instead.

This is just `std::vec` for now - if you think this is a good idea I can
convert the rest of the standard library.
2021-03-28 14:16:03 +00:00
Joshua Nelson
e051db6838 may not -> might not
"may not" has two possible meanings:
1. A command: "You may not stay up past your bedtime."
2. A fact that's only sometimes true: "Some cities may not have bike lanes."

In some cases, the meaning is ambiguous: "Some cars may not have snow
tires." (do the cars *happen* to not have snow tires, or is it
physically impossible for them to have snow tires?)

This changes places where the standard library uses the "description of
fact" meaning to say "might not" instead.

This is just `std::vec` for now - if you think this is a good idea I can
convert the rest of the standard library.
2021-03-27 16:01:16 -04:00
Josh Stone
3b1f5e3462 Use iter::zip in library/ 2021-03-26 09:32:29 -07:00
Michael Howell
ef1bd5776d Change wording 2021-03-25 02:58:34 -07:00
Michael Howell
b3321e2860 Add docs for Vec::from functions
Part of #51430
2021-03-24 18:43:18 -07:00
The8472
6c67e55270 specialize in-place collection further via TrustedRandomAccess
This allows the optimizer to turn certain iterator pipelines such as

```rust
let vec = vec![0usize; 100];
vec.into_iter().map(|e| e as isize).collect::<Vec<_>>()
```

into a noop.

The optimization only applies when iterator sources are  `T: Copy`
since `impl TrustedRandomAccess for IntoIter<T>`.
No such requirement applies to the output type (`Iterator::Item`).
2021-03-21 20:54:06 +01:00
Dylan DPC
90797ef008 Rollup merge of #82191 - Soveu:dedup, r=nagisa
Vec::dedup_by optimization

Now `Vec::dedup_by` drops items in-place as it goes through them.
From my benchmarks, it is around 10% faster when T is small, with no major regression when otherwise.

I used `ptr::copy` instead of conditional `ptr::copy_nonoverlapping`, because the latter had some weird performance issues on my ryzen laptop (it was 50% slower on it than on intel/sandybridge laptop)
It would be good if someone was able to reproduce these results.
2021-03-18 00:28:04 +01:00
Yuki Okushi
b6df781643 Rollup merge of #83072 - henryboisdequin:patch-1, r=Dylan-DPC
Update `Vec` docs

Fix typos/nits in `Vec` docs
2021-03-16 23:53:54 +09:00
Soveu
96d6f22a8e Merge branch 'master' into dedup 2021-03-15 21:51:38 +01:00
Soveu
afdbc9ece1 Vec::dedup optimization - finishing polishes 2021-03-15 20:36:29 +01:00
Henry Boisdequin
81d1d82596 Update Vec docs 2021-03-13 07:58:03 +05:30
Waffle
1f031d95de Add regression test for Vec::extend_from_within leak 2021-03-04 17:10:57 +03:00
Waffle
84e9608596 Fix leak in Vec::extend_from_within
Previously vec's len was updated only after full copy, making the method
leak if T::clone panic!s.

This commit makes `Vec::extend_from_within` (or, more accurately, it's
`T: Clone` specialization) update vec's len on every iteration, fixing
the issue.

`T: Copy` specialization was not affected by the issue b/c it doesn't
call user specified code (as, e.g. `T::clone`), and instead calls
`ptr::copy_nonoverlapping`.
2021-03-04 17:10:57 +03:00
Yuki Okushi
290117f7d9 Rollup merge of #82564 - WaffleLapkin:revert_spare_mut, r=RalfJung
Revert `Vec::spare_capacity_mut` impl to prevent pointers invalidation

The implementation was changed in #79015.

Later it was [pointed out](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81944#issuecomment-782849785) that the implementation invalidates pointers to the buffer (initialized elements) by creating a unique reference to the buffer. This PR reverts the implementation.

r? ```@RalfJung```
2021-03-04 20:01:06 +09:00
Waffle Lapkin
950f12119e Update library/alloc/src/vec/mod.rs
Co-authored-by: Ralf Jung <post@ralfj.de>
2021-03-03 20:04:20 +03:00
Waffle
a1835bcb01 Make Vec::split_at_spare_mut impl safer & simplier 2021-03-03 01:04:20 +03:00
bors
795a934b51 Auto merge of #82043 - tmiasko:may-have-side-effect, r=kennytm
Turn may_have_side_effect into an associated constant

The `may_have_side_effect` is an implementation detail of `TrustedRandomAccess`
trait. It describes if obtaining an iterator element may have side effects. It
is currently implemented as an associated function.

Turn `may_have_side_effect` into an associated constant. This makes the
value immediately available to the optimizer.
2021-03-02 16:08:32 +00:00
Waffle
2f04a793ae Revert Vec::spare_capacity_mut impl to prevent pointers invalidation 2021-02-27 00:27:34 +03:00
Joshua Nelson
9a75f4fed1 Convert primitives to use intra-doc links 2021-02-25 20:31:53 -05:00
Miguel Ojeda
eefec8abda library: Normalize safety-for-unsafe-block comments
Almost all safety comments are of the form `// SAFETY:`,
so normalize the rest and fix a few of them that should
have been a `/// # Safety` section instead.

Furthermore, make `tidy` only allow the uppercase form. While
currently `tidy` only checks `core`, it is a good idea to prevent
`core` from drifting to non-uppercase comments, so that later
we can start checking `alloc` etc. too.

Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2021-02-24 06:13:42 +01:00
Dylan DPC
72e6d51583 Rollup merge of #81154 - dylni:improve-design-of-assert-len, r=KodrAus
Improve design of `assert_len`

It was discussed in the [tracking issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76393#issuecomment-761765448) that `assert_len`'s name and usage are confusing. This PR improves them based on a suggestion by ``@scottmcm`` in that issue.

I also improved the documentation to make it clearer when you might want to use this method.

Old example:

```rust
let range = range.assert_len(slice.len());
```

New example:

```rust
let range = range.ensure_subset_of(..slice.len());
```

Fixes #81157
2021-02-23 02:51:43 +01:00
Soveu
c114894b90 Vec::dedup optimization - panic gracefully 2021-02-17 17:21:12 +01:00
Soveu
1825810a89 Vec::dedup optimization 2021-02-16 18:48:42 +01:00
Tomasz Miąsko
dc3304c341 Turn may_have_side_effect into an associated constant
The `may_have_side_effect` is an implementation detail of `TrustedRandomAccess`
trait. It describes if obtaining an iterator element may have side effects. It
is currently implemented as an associated function.

Turn `may_have_side_effect` into an associated constant. This makes the
value immediately available to the optimizer.
2021-02-15 17:36:29 +01:00
Yuki Okushi
4cb381037e Rollup merge of #81811 - schteve:fix_vec_retain_doc_test, r=m-ou-se
Fix doc test for Vec::retain(), now passes clippy::eval_order_dependence

Doc test for Vec::retain() works correctly but is flagged by clippy::eval_order_dependence. Fix avoids the issue by using an iterator instead of an index.
2021-02-13 16:36:40 +09:00
dylni
fe4fe19ddc Update new usage of assert_len 2021-02-12 22:03:39 -05:00
dylni
5d519eaa6e Rename Range::ensure_subset_of to slice::range 2021-02-12 22:01:04 -05:00
dylni
cb647f3e8e Fix possible soundness issue in ensure_subset_of 2021-02-12 22:01:04 -05:00
dylni
9d29793614 Improve design of assert_len 2021-02-12 22:01:04 -05:00
bors
1efd804983 Auto merge of #81126 - oxalica:retain-early-drop, r=m-ou-se
Optimize Vec::retain

Use `copy_non_overlapping` instead of `swap` to reduce memory writes, like what we've done in #44355 and `String::retain`.
#48065 already tried to do this optimization but it is reverted in #67300 due to bad codegen of `DrainFilter::drop`.

This PR re-implement the drop-then-move approach. I did a [benchmark](https://gist.github.com/oxalica/3360eec9376f22533fcecff02798b698) on small-no-drop, small-need-drop, large-no-drop elements with different predicate functions. It turns out that the new implementation is >20% faster in average for almost all cases. Only 2/24 cases are slower by 3% and 5%. See the link above for more detail.

I think regression in may-panic cases is due to drop-guard preventing some optimization. If it's permitted to leak elements when predicate function of element's `drop` panic, the new implementation should be almost always faster than current one.
I'm not sure if we should leak on panic, since there is indeed an issue (#52267) complains about it before.
2021-02-11 04:40:57 +00:00
Ashley Mannix
8ff7b75c01 update tracking issue for vec_split_at_spare 2021-02-10 09:50:59 +10:00