codegen_ssa: replace a Result by an Either
`Err` here clearly does not indicate an "error" of any sort, so the use of `Result` is confusing. Let's use a sum type that does not come with the baggage of `Result`.
Pretend in bootstrap snapshot tests that we always build in-tree LLVM
Otherwise, depending on whether CI LLVM is inhibited or if an externally-provided LLVM is used, bootstrap host LLVM build step could be missing in step snapshots.
Note that I'm not sure if this is the *right* solution (this might be *a* solution). I imagine we do want to control for the set of configuration that these snapshot tests are run, as much as possible.
r? `@Kobzol`
Remove `Symbol` from `Named` variant of `BoundRegionKind`/`LateParamRegionKind`
The `Symbol` is redundant, since we already store a `DefId` in the region variant. Instead, load the name via `item_name` when needed (which is almost always on the diagnostic path).
This introduces a `BoundRegionKind::NamedAnon` which is used for giving anonymous bound regions names, but which should only be used during pretty printing and error reporting.
Fix CLI completion check in `tidy`
The list of CLI completion files that were generated and that were checked by `x test tidy` was not synced. Recently, some PR only updated some of the files, which caused the rest of the files (not checked by `x test tidy`) to be dirty on `master`. This PR fixes the logic in bootstrap to always synchronize the list of completion paths.
Fixes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/143451
r? `@jieyouxu`
test passing a `VaList` from rust to C
Have C define various functions that take a `...` or `va_list` as an argument, and call them from rust. As far as I can see, this just wasn't actually tested before.
In particular this tests a difference between rust `VaList` and C `va_list` where C uses array-to-pointer decay, but rust cannot.
I've locally tested this for
- `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu`
- `aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu`
- `s390x-unknown-linux-gnu`
- `powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu`
- `powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu`
The latter 2 use an opaque pointer, the first 3 use a single-element array.
cc `@beetrees` if you see anything incorrect here
r? `@workingjubilee`
`tests/ui`: A New Order [25/N]
> [!NOTE]
>
> Intermediate commits are intended to help review, but will be squashed prior to merge.
Some `tests/ui/` housekeeping, to trim down number of tests directly under `tests/ui/`. Part of rust-lang/rust#133895.
r? `@tgross35`
`tests/ui`: A New Order [24/N]
> [!NOTE]
>
> Intermediate commits are intended to help review, but will be squashed prior to merge.
Some `tests/ui/` housekeeping, to trim down number of tests directly under `tests/ui/`. Part of rust-lang/rust#133895.
r? `@tgross35`
`tests/ui`: A New Order [22/N]
> [!NOTE]
>
> Intermediate commits are intended to help review, but will be squashed prior to merge.
Some `tests/ui/` housekeeping, to trim down number of tests directly under `tests/ui/`. Part of rust-lang/rust#133895.
r? `@tgross35`
`tests/ui`: A New Order [21/N]
> [!NOTE]
>
> Intermediate commits are intended to help review, but will be squashed prior to merge.
Some `tests/ui/` housekeeping, to trim down number of tests directly under `tests/ui/`. Part of rust-lang/rust#133895.
r? `@tgross35`
`tests/ui`: A New Order [18/N]
> [!NOTE]
>
> Intermediate commits are intended to help review, but will be squashed prior to merge.
Some `tests/ui/` housekeeping, to trim down number of tests directly under `tests/ui/`. Part of rust-lang/rust#133895.
r? `@tgross35`
`tests/ui`: A New Order [14/N]
> [!NOTE]
>
> Intermediate commits are intended to help review, but will be squashed prior to merge.
Some `tests/ui/` housekeeping, to trim down number of tests directly under `tests/ui/`. Part of rust-lang/rust#133895.
r? `@jieyouxu`
Allow `enum` and `union` literals to also create SSA values
Today, `Some(x)` always goes through an `alloca`, even in trivial cases where the niching means the constructor doesn't even change the value.
For example, <https://rust.godbolt.org/z/6KG6PqoYz>
```rust
pub fn demo(r: &i32) -> Option<&i32> {
Some(r)
}
```
currently emits the IR
```llvm
define align 4 ptr `@demo(ptr` align 4 %r) unnamed_addr {
start:
%_0 = alloca [8 x i8], align 8
store ptr %r, ptr %_0, align 8
%0 = load ptr, ptr %_0, align 8
ret ptr %0
}
```
but with this PR it becomes just
```llvm
define align 4 ptr `@demo(ptr` align 4 %r) unnamed_addr {
start:
ret ptr %r
}
```
(Of course the optimizer can clean that up, but it'd be nice if it didn't have to -- especially in debug where it doesn't run. This is like rust-lang/rust#123886, but that only handled non-simd `struct`s -- this PR generalizes it to all non-simd ADTs.)
Doing this means handing variants other than `FIRST_VARIANT`, handling the active field for unions, refactoring the discriminant code so the Place and Operand parts can share the calculation, etc.
Other PRs that led up to this one:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/142005
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/142103
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/142324
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/142383
---
try-job: aarch64-gnu
clean up GVN TypeId test
addresses https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/142789#discussion_r2184897992
This is an attempt to clarify what this test is actually supposed to test and make it less dependent on `TypeId` internals (it now depends on the output of `type_name` instead).
I verified that this version still miscompiles on `nightly-2025-02-11`.
r? ``@oli-obk`` ``@RalfJung``
remove special-casing of boxes from match exhaustiveness/usefulness analysis
As a first step in replacing `box_patterns` with `deref_patterns`, this treats box patterns as deref patterns in the THIR and exhaustiveness analysis. This allows a bunch of special-casing to be removed. The emitted MIR is unchanged.
Incidentally, this fixes a bug caused by box patterns being treated like structs rather than pointers, where enabling `exhaustive_patterns` (rust-lang/rust#51085) could give rise to spurious `unreachable_patterns` lints on arms required for exhaustiveness. Following the lint's advice to remove the match arm would result in an error. I'm not sure what the current state of `exhaustive_patterns` is with regard to reference/box opsem, or whether there's any intention to have `unreachable_patterns` be more granular than the whole arm, but regardless this should hopefully make them easier to handle consistently.
Tracking issue for deref patterns: rust-lang/rust#87121
r? `@Nadrieril`
Assign dependency bump PRs to me
These PRs sometimes get lost as GH reduces their visibility, so I wanted to get an assignment so I can help these PRs land
Make metadata a workproduct and reuse it
This PR aims to skip the generation of metadata by reusing the infrastructure that already exists for compiled codegen-units, namely "workproducts".
This can yield substantial gains (~10%) when we can demonstrate that metadata does not change between an incremental session and the next. This is the case if the crate is unchanged, or if all the changes are in upstream crates and have no effect on it. This latter case is most interesting, as it arises regularly for users with several crates in their workspace.
TODO:
- [x] Materialize the fact that metadata encoding relies on the relative order of definitions;
- [x] Refactor the handling of doc links.
