Skip walking into param-env component if it has no placeholder/re-var
Although it only provides a minor perf improvement, it seems like it could matter in more pathological cases.
Nobody seems to actually use this, while still adding some extra
complexity to the already rather complex codegen coordinator code.
It is also not supported by any backend other than the LLVM backend.
resolve: Do not create `NameResolutions` on access unless necessary
`fn resolution` now just performs the access, and `fn resolution_or_default` will insert a default entry if the entry is missing.
Allow pretty printing paths with `-Zself-profile-events=args`
`-Zself-profile-events=args` is pretty heavy and can pretty print a lot of stuff. Rather than hunting down specific cases where this happens, I'd just allow calling `trimmed_def_paths` in this mode.
Fixes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/144457
r? `@RalfJung`
Call `is_parsed_attribute` rather than keeping track of a list of parsed attributes manually
r? ```@oli-obk```
Nicer code & will prevent issues like https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/144358 in the future
Suggest unwrapping when private method name is available in inner type
Given
```rust
fn main() {
let maybe_vec = Some(vec![1,2,3]);
assert_eq!(maybe_vec.len(), 3);
}
```
suggest unwraping `maybe_vec` to call `.len()` on the `Vec<_>`.
```
error[E0624]: method `len` is private
--> $DIR/enum-method-probe.rs:61:9
|
LL | res.len();
| ^^^ private method
--> $SRC_DIR/core/src/option.rs:LL:COL
|
= note: private method defined here
|
note: the method `len` exists on the type `Vec<{integer}>`
--> $SRC_DIR/alloc/src/vec/mod.rs:LL:COL
help: consider using `Option::expect` to unwrap the `Vec<{integer}>` value, panicking if the value is an `Option::None`
|
LL | res.expect("REASON").len();
| +++++++++++++++++
```
When a method isn't available, we emit E0599, but when it is private we emit E0624. We now just invoke the same suggestion logic from the later that we already did in the former.
Fixrust-lang/rust#143795.
Disable has_reliable_f128_math on musl targets
musl does not implement the symbols required by rustc for f128 maths. Disable the associated cfg for all musl targets and adjust the tests accordingly.
Closesrust-lang/rust#144423
Fix unused_parens false positive
Resolvesrust-lang/rust#143653.
The "no bounds exception" was indiscriminately set to `OneBound` for referents and pointees. However, if the reference or pointer type itself appears in no-bounds position, any constraints it has must be propagated.
```rust
// unused parens: not in no-bounds position
fn foo(_: Box<(dyn Send)>) {}
// unused parens: in no-bounds position, but one-bound exception applies
fn bar(_: Box<dyn Fn(&u32) -> &(dyn Send)>) {}
// *NOT* unused parens: in no-bounds position, but no exceptions to be made
fn baz(_: Box<dyn Fn(&u32) -> &(dyn Send) + Send>) {}
```
Mention type that could be `Clone` but isn't in more cases
When encountering a moved value of a type that isn't `Clone` because of unmet obligations, but where all the unmet predicates reference crate-local types, mention them and suggest cloning, as we do in other cases already:
```
error[E0507]: cannot move out of `foo`, a captured variable in an `Fn` closure
--> f111.rs:14:25
|
13 | fn do_stuff(foo: Option<Foo>) {
| --- captured outer variable
14 | require_fn_trait(|| async {
| -- ^^^^^ `foo` is moved here
| |
| captured by this `Fn` closure
15 | if foo.map_or(false, |f| f.foo()) {
| ---
| |
| variable moved due to use in coroutine
| move occurs because `foo` has type `Option<Foo>`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
|
note: if `Foo` implemented `Clone`, you could clone the value
--> f111.rs:4:1
|
4 | struct Foo;
| ^^^^^^^^^^ consider implementing `Clone` for this type
...
15 | if foo.map_or(false, |f| f.foo()) {
| --- you could clone this value
```
CC rust-lang/rust#68119.
pattern_analysis: add option to get a full set of witnesses
This adds an option to the rustc_pattern_analysis machinery to have it report a complete set of patterns when a match is non-exhaustive (by default we only guarantee to report _some_ missing patterns). This is for use in rust-analyzer.
Leaving as draft until I'm sure this is what r-a needs.
r? ghost
Because doc code does not get automatically formatted, some doc code has
creative placements of comments that automatic formatting can't handle.
Reformat those comments to make the resulting code support standard Rust
formatting without breaking; this is generally an improvement to
readability as well.
Some comments are not indented to the prevailing indent, and are instead
aligned under some bit of code. Indent them to the prevailing indent,
and put spaces *inside* the comments to align them with code.
Some comments span several lines of code (which aren't the line the
comment is about) and expect alignment. Reformat them into one comment
not broken up by unrelated intervening code.
Some comments are placed on the same line as an opening brace, placing
them effectively inside the subsequent block, such that formatting would
typically format them like a line of that block. Move those comments to
attach them to what they apply to.
Some comments are placed on the same line as a one-line braced block,
effectively attaching them to the closing brace, even though they're
about the code inside the block. Reformat to make sure the comment will
stay on the same line as the code it's commenting.
musl does not implement the symbols required by std for f128 maths.
Disable the associated cfg for all musl targets and adjust the tests
accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Jens Reidel <adrian@travitia.xyz>
These examples feature Rust code that's presented primarily to
illustrate how its compilation would be handled, and these examples are
formatted to highlight those aspects in ways that rustfmt wouldn't
preserve. Turn formatting off in those examples.
(Doc code isn't formatted yet, but this will make it easier to enable
doc code formatting in the future.)
Do not run per-module late lints if they can be all skipped
We run ~70 late lints for all dependencies even if they use `--cap-lints=allow`, which seems wasteful. It looks like these lints are super fast (unlike early lints), but still.
r? `@ghost`
When encountering a moved value of a type that isn't `Clone` because of unmet obligations, but where all the unmet predicates reference crate-local types, mention them and suggest cloning, as we do in other cases already:
```
error[E0507]: cannot move out of `foo`, a captured variable in an `Fn` closure
--> f111.rs:14:25
|
13 | fn do_stuff(foo: Option<Foo>) {
| --- captured outer variable
14 | require_fn_trait(|| async {
| -- ^^^^^ `foo` is moved here
| |
| captured by this `Fn` closure
15 | if foo.map_or(false, |f| f.foo()) {
| ---
| |
| variable moved due to use in coroutine
| move occurs because `foo` has type `Option<Foo>`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
|
note: if `Foo` implemented `Clone`, you could clone the value
--> f111.rs:4:1
|
4 | struct Foo;
| ^^^^^^^^^^ consider implementing `Clone` for this type
...
15 | if foo.map_or(false, |f| f.foo()) {
| --- you could clone this value
```
rustc_public: Remove movability from `RigidTy/AggregateKind::Coroutine`
Part of rust-lang/rust#119174 .
I think we should be good now to sync this change in rustc_public.
Remove dead code and extend test coverage and diagnostics around it
I was staring a bit at the `dont_niche_optimize_enum` variable and figured out that part of it is dead code (at least today it is). I changed the diagnostic and test around the code that makes that part dead code, so everything that makes removing that code sound is visible in this PR
resolve: Remove `Scope::CrateRoot`
Use `Scope::Module` with the crate root module inside instead, which should be identical.
This is a simplification by itself, but it will be even larger simplification if something like https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/144131 is implemented, because `Scope::CrateRoot` is also a module with two actual scopes in it (for globs and non-globs).
I also did some renamings for consistency:
- `ScopeSet::AbsolutePath` -> `ScopeSet::ModuleAndExternPrelude`
- `ModuleOrUniformRoot::CrateRootAndExternPrelude` -> `ModuleOrUniformRoot::ModuleAndExternPrelude`
- `is_absolute_path` -> `module_and_extern_prelude`
Don't emit two `assume`s in transmutes when one is a subset of the other
For example, transmuting between `bool` and `Ordering` doesn't need two `assume`s because one range is a superset of the other.
Multiple are still used for things like `char` <-> `NonZero<u32>`, which overlap but where neither fully contains the other.
Tweak output for non-`Clone` values moved into closures
When we encounter a non-`Clone` value being moved into a closure, try to find the corresponding type of the binding being moved, if it is a `let`-binding or a function parameter. If any of those cases, we point at them with the note explaining that the type is not `Copy`, instead of giving that label to the place where it is captured. When it is a `let`-binding with no explicit type, we point at the initializer (if it fits in a single line).
```
error[E0507]: cannot move out of `foo`, a captured variable in an `Fn` closure
--> f111.rs:14:25
|
13 | fn do_stuff(foo: Option<Foo>) {
| --- ----------- move occurs because `foo` has type `Option<Foo>`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
| |
| captured outer variable
14 | require_fn_trait(|| async {
| -- ^^^^^ `foo` is moved here
| |
| captured by this `Fn` closure
15 | if foo.map_or(false, |f| f.foo()) {
| --- variable moved due to use in coroutine
```
instead of
```
error[E0507]: cannot move out of `foo`, a captured variable in an `Fn` closure
--> f111.rs:14:25
|
13 | fn do_stuff(foo: Option<Foo>) {
| --- captured outer variable
14 | require_fn_trait(|| async {
| -- ^^^^^ `foo` is moved here
| |
| captured by this `Fn` closure
15 | if foo.map_or(false, |f| f.foo()) {
| ---
| |
| variable moved due to use in coroutine
| move occurs because `foo` has type `Option<Foo>`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
```
