Remove deprecated LLVM-style inline assembly
The `llvm_asm!` was deprecated back in #87590 1.56.0, with intention to remove
it once `asm!` was stabilized, which already happened in #91728 1.59.0. Now it
is time to remove `llvm_asm!` to avoid continued maintenance cost.
Closes#70173.
Closes#92794.
Closes#87612.
Closes#82065.
cc `@rust-lang/wg-inline-asm`
r? `@Amanieu`
- Do not `#[doc(hidden)]` the `#[derive]` macro attribute
- Add a link to the reference section to `derive`'s inherent docs
- Do the same for `#[test]` and `#[global_allocator]`
- Fix `GlobalAlloc` link (why is it on `core` and not `alloc`?)
- Try `no_inline`-ing the `std` reexports from `core`
- Revert "Try `no_inline`-ing the `std` reexports from `core`"
- Address PR review
- Also document the unstable macros
The `unreachable!` docs previously did not mention that there was a second
form, `unreachable!("message")` that could be used to specify a custom panic
message,
The docs now mention this in the same style as currently used for `unimplemented!`:
https://doc.rust-lang.org/core/macro.unimplemented.html#panics
Update the bootstrap compiler
This updates the bootstrap compiler, notably leaving out a change to enable semicolon in macro expressions lint, because stdarch still depends on the old behavior.
Improve assert_eq! and assert_ne!
This PR improves `assert_eq!` and `assert_ne!` by moving the panicking code in an external function.
It does not change the fast path, but the move of the formatting in the cold path (the panic) may have a positive effect on in instruction cache use and with inlining.
Moreover, the use of trait objects instead of generic may improve compile times for `assert_eq!`-heavy code.
Godbolt link: ~~https://rust.godbolt.org/z/TYa9MT~~ \
Updated: https://rust.godbolt.org/z/bzE84x
Document that `assert!` format arguments are evaluated lazily
It can be useful to do some computation in `assert!` format arguments, in order to get better error messages. For example:
```rust
assert!(
some_condition,
"The state is invalid. Details: {}",
expensive_call_to_get_debugging_info(),
);
```
It seems like `assert!` only evaluates the format arguments if the assertion fails, which is useful but doesn't appear to be documented anywhere. This PR documents the behavior and adds some tests.
It can be useful to do some computation in `assert!` format arguments, in order to get better error messages. For example:
```rust
assert!(
some_condition,
"The state is invalid. Details: {}",
expensive_call_to_get_debugging_info(),
);
```
It seems like `assert!` only evaluates the format arguments if the assertion fails, which is useful but doesn't appear to be documented anywhere. This PR documents the behavior and adds some tests.
