Implementation of RFC2867
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74727
So I've started work on this, I think my next steps are to make use of the `instruction_set` value in the llvm codegen but this is the point where I begin to get a bit lost. I'm looking at the code but it would be nice to have some guidance on what I've currently done and what I'm doing next 😄
RunCompiler::new takes non-optional params, and optional
params can be set using set_*field_name* method.
finally `run` will forward all fields to `run_compiler`.
Upgrade to tracing-subscriber 0.2.13
The primary motivation is to get the changes from
https://github.com/tokio-rs/tracing/pull/990. Example output:
```
$ RUSTDOC_LOG=debug rustdoc +rustc2
warning: some trace filter directives would enable traces that are disabled statically
| `debug` would enable the DEBUG level for all targets
= note: the static max level is `info`
= help: to enable DEBUG logging, remove the `max_level_info` feature
```
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
cc `@hawkw` ❤️
Use `pretty::create_dump_file` for dumping dataflow results
The old code wasn't incorporating promoteds into the path, meaning other `dot` files could get clobbered. Use the MIR dump infrastructure to generate paths so that this doesn't occur in the future.
Detect blocks that could be struct expr bodies
This approach lives exclusively in the parser, so struct expr bodies
that are syntactically correct on their own but are otherwise incorrect
will still emit confusing errors, like in the following case:
```rust
fn foo() -> Foo {
bar: Vec::new()
}
```
```
error[E0425]: cannot find value `bar` in this scope
--> src/file.rs:5:5
|
5 | bar: Vec::new()
| ^^^ expecting a type here because of type ascription
error[E0214]: parenthesized type parameters may only be used with a `Fn` trait
--> src/file.rs:5:15
|
5 | bar: Vec::new()
| ^^^^^ only `Fn` traits may use parentheses
error[E0107]: wrong number of type arguments: expected 1, found 0
--> src/file.rs:5:10
|
5 | bar: Vec::new()
| ^^^^^^^^^^ expected 1 type argument
```
If that field had a trailing comma, that would be a parse error and it
would trigger the new, more targetted, error:
```
error: struct literal body without path
--> file.rs:4:17
|
4 | fn foo() -> Foo {
| _________________^
5 | | bar: Vec::new(),
6 | | }
| |_^
|
help: you might have forgotten to add the struct literal inside the block
|
4 | fn foo() -> Foo { Path {
5 | bar: Vec::new(),
6 | } }
|
```
Partially address last remaining part of #34255.
perf: UninhabitedEnumBranching avoid n^2
Avoid n² complexity. This showed up in a profile for match-stress-enum that has 8192 variants
I have only profiled locally against `match-stress-enum`, so we should have it perf tested to make sure it does not regress other crates.
The primary motivation is to get the changes from
https://github.com/tokio-rs/tracing/pull/990. Example output:
```
$ RUSTDOC_LOG=debug rustdoc +rustc2
warning: some trace filter directives would enable traces that are disabled statically
| `debug` would enable the DEBUG level for all targets
= note: the static max level is `info`
= help: to enable DEBUG logging, remove the `max_level_info` feature
```
- Remove useless test
This was testing for an ICE when passing `RUST_LOG=rustc_middle`. I
noticed it because it started giving the tracing warning (because tests
are not run with debug-logging enabled). Since this bug seems unlikely
to re-occur, I just removed it altogether.
Prevent stack overflow in deeply nested types.
Related issue #75577 (?)
Unfortunately, I am unable to test whether this actually solves the problem because apparently, 12GB RAM + 2GB swap is not enough to compile the (admittedly toy) source file.
This approach lives exclusively in the parser, so struct expr bodies
that are syntactically correct on their own but are otherwise incorrect
will still emit confusing errors, like in the following case:
```rust
fn foo() -> Foo {
bar: Vec::new()
}
```
```
error[E0425]: cannot find value `bar` in this scope
--> src/file.rs:5:5
|
5 | bar: Vec::new()
| ^^^ expecting a type here because of type ascription
error[E0214]: parenthesized type parameters may only be used with a `Fn` trait
--> src/file.rs:5:15
|
5 | bar: Vec::new()
| ^^^^^ only `Fn` traits may use parentheses
error[E0107]: wrong number of type arguments: expected 1, found 0
--> src/file.rs:5:10
|
5 | bar: Vec::new()
| ^^^^^^^^^^ expected 1 type argument
```
If that field had a trailing comma, that would be a parse error and it
would trigger the new, more targetted, error:
```
error: struct literal body without path
--> file.rs:4:17
|
4 | fn foo() -> Foo {
| _________________^
5 | | bar: Vec::new(),
6 | | }
| |_^
|
help: you might have forgotten to add the struct literal inside the block
|
4 | fn foo() -> Foo { Path {
5 | bar: Vec::new(),
6 | } }
|
```
Partially address last part of #34255.
Give `impl Trait` in a `const fn` its own feature gate
...previously it was gated under `#![feature(const_fn)]`.
I think we actually want to do this in all const-contexts? If so, this should be `#![feature(const_impl_trait)]` instead. I don't think there's any way to make use of `impl Trait` within a `const` initializer.
cc #77463
r? `@oli-obk`
resolve: improve "try using the enum's variant"
Fixes#73427.
This PR improves the "try using the enum's variant" suggestion:
- Variants in suggestions would not result in more errors (e.g. use of a struct variant is only suggested if the suggestion can trivially construct that variant). Therefore, suggestions are only emitted for variants that have no fields (since the suggestion can't know what value fields would have).
- Suggestions include the syntax for constructing the variant. If a struct or tuple variant is suggested, then it is constructed in the suggestion - unless in pattern-matching or when arguments are already provided.
- A help message is added which mentions the variants which are no longer suggested.
All of the diagnostic logic introduced by this PR is separated from the normal code path for a successful compilation.
r? `@estebank`
