`hir`: Add `Become` expression kind (explicit tail calls experiment)
This adds `hir::ExprKind::Become` alongside ast lowering. During hir-thir lowering we currently lower `become` as `return`, so that we can partially test `become` without ICEing.
cc `@scottmcm`
r? `@Nilstrieb`
For non-incremental builds on Unix, currently all the thread names look
like `opt regex.f10ba03eb5ec7975-cgu.0`. But they are truncated by
`pthread_setname` to `opt regex.f10ba`, hiding the numeric suffix that
distinguishes them. This is really annoying when using a profiler like
Samply.
This commit changes these thread names to a form like `opt cgu.0`, which
is much better.
Currently there are two problems.
First, the CGUS don't end up in size order. The merging loop does sort
by size on each iteration, but we don't sort after the final merge, so
typically there is one CGU out of place. (And sometimes we don't enter
the merging loop at all, in which case they end up in random order.)
Second, we then assign names that differ only by a numeric suffix, and
then we sort them lexicographically by name, giving us an order like
this:
regex.f10ba03eb5ec7975-cgu.1
regex.f10ba03eb5ec7975-cgu.10
regex.f10ba03eb5ec7975-cgu.11
regex.f10ba03eb5ec7975-cgu.12
regex.f10ba03eb5ec7975-cgu.13
regex.f10ba03eb5ec7975-cgu.14
regex.f10ba03eb5ec7975-cgu.15
regex.f10ba03eb5ec7975-cgu.2
regex.f10ba03eb5ec7975-cgu.3
regex.f10ba03eb5ec7975-cgu.4
regex.f10ba03eb5ec7975-cgu.5
regex.f10ba03eb5ec7975-cgu.6
regex.f10ba03eb5ec7975-cgu.7
regex.f10ba03eb5ec7975-cgu.8
regex.f10ba03eb5ec7975-cgu.9
These two problems are really annoying when debugging and profiling the
CGUs.
This commit ensures CGUs are sorted by name *and* reverse sorted by
size. This involves (a) one extra sort by size operation, and (b)
padding the numeric indices with zeroes, e.g.
`regex.f10ba03eb5ec7975-cgu.01`.
(Note that none of this applies for incremental builds, where a
different hash-based CGU naming scheme is used.)
Revert "Structurally resolve correctly in check_pat_lit"
This reverts commit 54fb5a48b9. Also adds a couple of tests, and downgrades the existing `-Ztrait-solver=next` test to a known-bug.
Fixes#112993
Add translatable diagnostic for cannot be reexported error
also added for subdiagnostics
Add translatable diagnostics for resolve_glob_import errors
Add translatable diag for unable to determine import resolution
Add translatable diag for is not directly importable
[-Ztrait-solver=next, mir-typeck] instantiate hidden types in the root universe
Fixes an ICE in the test `member-constraints-in-root-universe`.
Main motivation is to make #112691 pass under the new solver.
r? ``@compiler-errors``
Fix return type notation associated type suggestion when -Zlower-impl-trait-in-trait-to-assoc-ty
This avoid suggesting the associated types generated for RPITITs when the one the code refers to doesn't exist and rustc looks for a suggestion.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Fix return type notation errors with -Zlower-impl-trait-in-trait-to-assoc-ty
This just adjust the way we check for RPITITs and uses the new helper method to do the "old" and "new" check at once.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Don't emit same goal as input during `wf::unnormalized_obligations`
r? `@aliemjay` cc `@lcnr`
I accidentally pruned the logic to handle `WF(?0)` when writing `wf::unnormalized_obligations`.
idk if you wanted to construct a test first, but this is an obvious fix. Copied the comment from above.
Fixesrust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative#36
Stop bubbling out hidden types from the eval obligation queries
r? `@compiler-errors`
I don't know why these were added, but they are not needed anymore. The relevant test is unaffected and I didn't see anything interesting in logging that would have justified it.
This PR has no effect on the new solver behaviour of cf2dff2b1e/tests/ui/impl-trait/issue-99642.rs (which is overflow) and cf2dff2b1e/tests/ui/impl-trait/issue-99642-2.rs (which is "unstable certainty ICE")
Various impl trait in assoc tys cleanups
r? `@compiler-errors`
All commits except for the last are pure refactorings. 274dab5bd658c97886a8987340bf50ae57900c39 allows struct fields to participate in deciding whether a function has an opaque in its signature.
best reviewed commit by commit
Stop hiding const eval limit in external macros
fixes#112748
We don't emit a hard error if there was a previous deny lint triggering with the same message. If that lint ends up not being emitted, we ICE and don't emit an error either.
Migrate `item_bounds` to `ty::Clause`
Should be simpler than the next PR that's coming up. Last three commits are the relevant ones.
r? ``@oli-obk`` or ``@lcnr``
Don't ICE on unnormalized struct tail in layout computation
1. We try to compute a `SizeSkeleton` even if a layout error occurs, but we really only need to do this if we get `LayoutError::Unknown`, since that means our type is too polymorphic to actually compute the full layout. If we have other errors, like `LayoutError::NormalizationError` or `LayoutError::Cycle`, then we can't really make any progress, since this represents an actual error.
2. Avoid using `normalize_erasing_regions` and `struct_tail_erasing_lifetimes` since those ICE on normalization errors, and since we may call `layout_of` in HIR typeck, we don't know for certain that we're on the happy path.
Fixes#112736
Always register sized obligation for argument
Removes a "hack" that skips registering sized obligations for parameters that are simple identifiers. This doesn't seem to affect diagnostics because we're probably already being smart enough about deduplicating identical error messages anyways.
Fixes#112608
rustc_session: default to -Z plt=yes on non-x86_64
Per the discussion in #106380 plt=no isn't a great default, and rust-lang/compiler-team#581 decided that the default should be PLT=yes for everything except x86_64. Not everyone agrees about the x86_64 part of this change, but this at least is an improvement in the state of things without changing the x86_64 situation, so I've attempted making this change in the name of not letting the perfect be the enemy of the good.
Please let me know if I've messed this up somehow - I'm not wholly confident I got this right.
r? `@nikic`
