Update docs for default features of wasm targets
LLVM 20 enabled the `nontrapping-fptoint` and `bulk-memory` features by default, so this updates the corresponding documentation for the `wasm32-*` targets (which all point to `wasm32-unknown-unknown`).
Closes#137315 with a doc update for the doc part.
Workaround Cranelift not yet properly supporting vectors smaller than 128bit
While it would technically be possible to workaround this in cg_clif, it quickly becomes very messy and would likely cause correctness issues. Working around it in rustc instead is much simper and won't have any negative impact for code running on stable as vectors smaller than 128bit can only be made on nightly using core::simd or #[repr(simd)].
Update references to cc_detect.rs
The locations of these file references have since been changed.
This is a simple change to update the references to this `cc_detect.rs`
file.
Do not ignore uninhabited types for function-call ABI purposes. (Remove BackendRepr::Uninhabited)
Accepted MCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/832Fixes#135802
Do not consider the inhabitedness of a type for function call ABI purposes.
* Remove the [`rustc_abi::BackendRepr::Uninhabited`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_abi/enum.BackendRepr.html) variant
* Instead calculate the `BackendRepr` of uninhabited types "normally" (as though they were not uninhabited "at the top level", but still considering inhabitedness of variants to determine enum layout, etc)
* Add an `uninhabited: bool` field to [`rustc_abi::LayoutData`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_abi/struct.LayoutData.html) so inhabitedness of a `LayoutData` can still be queried when necessary (e.g. when determining if an enum variant needs a tag value allocated to it).
This should not affect type layouts (size/align/field offset); this should only affect function call ABI, and only of uninhabited types.
cc ``@RalfJung``
Pass through of target features to llvm-bitcode-linker and handling them
When using the llvm-bitcode-linker (`linker-flavor=llbc`) target-features are not passed through and are not handled by it.
The llvm-bitcode-linker is mainly used as a self contained linker to link llvm bitcode for the nvptx64 target. It uses `llvm-link`, `opt` and `llc` internally. To produce a `.ptx` file of a specific ptx-version it is necessary to pass the version to llc with the `--mattr` option. Without explicitly setting it, the emitted `.ptx`-version is the minimum supported version of the `--target-cpu`.
I would like to be able to explicitly set the ptx version as [some llvm problems only occur in earlier `.ptx`-versions](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/112998).
Therefore this pull request adds support for passing target features to llvm-bitcode-linker and handling them.
I was not quite sure if adding these features to `rustc_target/src/target_features.rs` is necessary or not. If so I will gladly add these.
r? ``@kjetilkjeka``
infer linker flavor by linker name if it's sufficiently specific
Fix: `rustc` does not infer `llvm-bitcode-linker` uses `llbc` linker flavor if targeting `nvptx64-nvidia-cuda`.
Stabilize `num_midpoint_signed` feature
This PR proposes that we stabilize the signed variants of [`iN::midpoint`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/110840#issue-1684506201), the operation is equivalent to doing `(a + b) / 2` in a sufficiently large number.
The stabilized API surface would be:
```rust
/// Calculates the middle point of `self` and `rhs`.
///
/// `midpoint(a, b)` is `(a + b) / 2` as if it were performed in a
/// sufficiently-large signed integer type. This implies that the result is
/// always rounded towards zero and that no overflow will ever occur.
impl i{8,16,32,64,128,size} {
pub const fn midpoint(self, rhs: Self) -> Self;
}
```
T-libs-api previously stabilized the unsigned (and float) variants in #131784, the signed variants were left out because of the rounding that should be used in case of negative midpoint.
This stabilization proposal proposes that we round towards zero because:
- it makes the obvious `(a + b) / 2` in a sufficiently-large number always true
- using another rounding for the positive result would be inconsistent with the unsigned variants
- it makes `midpoint(-a, -b)` == `-midpoint(a, b)` always true
- it is consistent with `midpoint(a as f64, b as f64) as i64`
- it makes it possible to always suggest `midpoint` as a replacement for `(a + b) / 2` expressions *(which we may want to do as a future work given the 21.2k hits on [GitHub Search](https://github.com/search?q=lang%3Arust+%2F%5C%28%5Ba-zA-Z_%5D*+%5C%2B+%5Ba-zA-Z_%5D*%5C%29+%5C%2F+2%2F&type=code&p=1))*
`@scottmcm` mentioned a drawback in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/132191#issuecomment-2439891200:
> I'm torn, because rounding towards zero makes it "wider" than other values, which `>> 1` avoids -- `(a + b) >> 1` has the nice behaviour that `midpoint(a, b) + 2 == midpoint(a + 2, b + 2)`.
>
> But I guess overall sticking with `(a + b) / 2` makes sense as well, and I do like the negation property 🤷
Which I think is outweigh by the advantages cited above.
Closes#110840
cc `@rust-lang/libs-api`
cc `@scottmcm`
r? `@dtolnay`
Create a generic AVR target: avr-none
This commit removes the `avr-unknown-gnu-atmega328` target and replaces it with a more generic `avr-none` variant that must be specialized using `-C target-cpu` (e.g. `-C target-cpu=atmega328p`).
Seizing the day, I'm adding myself as the maintainer of this target - I've been already fixing the bugs anyway, might as well make it official 🙂
Related discussions:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/131171
- https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/800
try-job: x86_64-gnu-debug
The comments didn't make much sense to me. I asked Matthew Jasper on
Zulip about it and they said:
> I think that at the time I wanted to replace all (or most of) this
> with a reference to the HIR Id of the variable. I'll give this a look
> to see if it's still a reasonable idea, but removing the comments is
> fine.
and then:
> I don't think that changing this to an HirId would be better,
> recovering the information from the HIR seems like too much effort in
> exchange for making the MIR a little smaller.
Fix codegen of uninhabited PassMode::Indirect return types.
Add codegen test for uninhabited PassMode::Indirect return types.
Enable optimizations for uninhabited return type codegen test
This updates the Fuchsia target spec with the [Clang Fuchsia driver],
which picks up a few changes:
* Adds `-z start-stop-visibility=hidden` and `-z rel` to the pre link
arguments.
* Adds `--execute-only` and `--fix-cortex-a53-843419` for
`aarch64-unknown-fuchsia`.
* Enables the cpu features equivalent to x86-64-v2 for
`x86_64-unknown-fuchsia`, which is our minimum supported x86_64.
platform according to [RFC-0073].
* Enables the cpu features `+crc,+aes,+sha2,+neon` on aarch64.
* Increases the max atomic width on 86_64 to 128.
* Enables stack probes and xray on aarch64 and riscv64.
[Clang Fuchsia driver]: 8374d42186/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Fuchsia.cpp
[RFC-0073]: https://fuchsia.dev/fuchsia-src/contribute/governance/rfcs/0073_x86_64_platform_requirement
When a `?` operation requires an `Into` conversion with additional bounds (like having a concrete error but wanting to convert to a trait object), we handle it speficically and provide the same kind of information we give other `?` related errors.
```
error[E0277]: `?` couldn't convert the error: `E: std::error::Error` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/bad-question-mark-on-trait-object.rs:5:13
|
LL | fn foo() -> Result<(), Box<dyn std::error::Error>> {
| -------------------------------------- required `E: std::error::Error` because of this
LL | Ok(bar()?)
| ^ the trait `std::error::Error` is not implemented for `E`
|
= note: the question mark operation (`?`) implicitly performs a conversion on the error value using the `From` trait
= note: required for `Box<dyn std::error::Error>` to implement `From<E>`
```
Avoid talking about `FromResidual` when other more relevant information is being given, particularly from `rust_on_unimplemented`.
LLVM 20 enabled the `nontrapping-fptoint` and `bulk-memory` features by
default, so this updates the corresponding documentation for the
`wasm32-*` targets (which all point to `wasm32-unknown-unknown`).
cc #137315
