Previously, we included a redundant prefix on the panic message and a postfix of the location of the panic. The prefix didn't carry any additional information beyond "something failed", and the location of the panic is redundant with the diagnostic's span, which gets printed out even if its code is not shown.
```
error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed
--> $DIR/assert-type-intrinsics.rs:11:9
|
LL | MaybeUninit::<!>::uninit().assume_init();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ evaluation panicked: aborted execution: attempted to instantiate uninhabited type `!`
```
```
error[E0080]: evaluation of `Fail::<i32>::C` failed
--> $DIR/collect-in-dead-closure.rs:9:19
|
LL | const C: () = panic!();
| ^^^^^^^^ evaluation panicked: explicit panic
|
= note: this error originates in the macro
`$crate::panic::panic_2015` which comes from the expansion of the macro
`panic` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
```
```
error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed
--> $DIR/uninhabited.rs:41:9
|
LL | assert!(false);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ evaluation panicked: assertion failed: false
|
= note: this error originates in the macro `assert` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
```
---
When the primary span for a const error is the same as the first frame in the const error report, skip it.
```
error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed
--> $DIR/issue-88434-removal-index-should-be-less.rs:3:24
|
LL | const _CONST: &[u8] = &f(&[], |_| {});
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ evaluation panicked: explicit panic
|
note: inside `f::<{closure@$DIR/issue-88434-removal-index-should-be-less.rs:3:31: 3:34}>`
--> $DIR/issue-88434-removal-index-should-be-less.rs:10:5
|
LL | panic!()
| ^^^^^^^^ the failure occurred here
= note: this error originates in the macro `$crate::panic::panic_2015` which comes from the expansion of the macro `panic` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
```
instead of
```
error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed
--> $DIR/issue-88434-removal-index-should-be-less.rs:10:5
|
LL | panic!()
| ^^^^^^^^ explicit panic
|
note: inside `f::<{closure@$DIR/issue-88434-removal-index-should-be-less.rs:3:31: 3:34}>`
--> $DIR/issue-88434-removal-index-should-be-less.rs:10:5
|
LL | panic!()
| ^^^^^^^^
note: inside `_CONST`
--> $DIR/issue-88434-removal-index-should-be-less.rs:3:24
|
LL | const _CONST: &[u8] = &f(&[], |_| {});
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
= note: this error originates in the macro `$crate::panic::panic_2015` which comes from the expansion of the macro `panic` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
```
---
Revert order of constant evaluation errors
Point at the code the user wrote first and std functions last.
```
error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed
--> $DIR/const-errs-dont-conflict-103369.rs:5:25
|
LL | impl ConstGenericTrait<{my_fn(1)}> for () {}
| ^^^^^^^^ evaluation panicked: Some error occurred
|
note: called from `my_fn`
--> $DIR/const-errs-dont-conflict-103369.rs:10:5
|
LL | panic!("Some error occurred");
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
= note: this error originates in the macro `$crate::panic::panic_2015` which comes from the expansion of the macro `panic` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
```
instead of
```
error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed
--> $DIR/const-errs-dont-conflict-103369.rs:10:5
|
LL | panic!("Some error occurred");
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Some error occurred
|
note: called from `<() as ConstGenericTrait<{my_fn(1)}>>::{constant#0}`
--> $DIR/const-errs-dont-conflict-103369.rs:5:25
|
LL | impl ConstGenericTrait<{my_fn(1)}> for () {}
| ^^^^^^^^
= note: this error originates in the macro `$crate::panic::panic_2015` which comes from the expansion of the macro `panic` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
```
Fix Windows `Command` search path bug
Currently `Command::new` on Windows works differently depending on whether any environment variable is set. For example,
```rust
// Searches for "myapp" in the application and system paths first (aka Windows native behaviour).
Command::new("myapp").spawn();
// Search for "myapp" in `PATH` first
Command::new("myapp").env("a", "b").spawn();
```
This is a bug because the search path should only change if `PATH` is changed for the child (i.e. `.env("PATH", "...")`).
This was discussed in a libs-api meeting where the exact semantics of `Command::new` was not decided but there seemed to be broad agreement that this particular thing is just a bug that can be fixed.
r? libs-api
tests: use minicore more
minicore makes it much easier to add new language items to all of the existing `no_core` tests.
Most of the remaining tests that *could* use minicore either fail because..
1. LLVM IR output changes and doesn't pass the test as written. I didn't look into these further.
2. The test has revisions w/ different compilation flags, expecting some to fail, and when using minicore, minicore is compiled with those flags and fails in the expected way because of the flags rather than the test, and that's considered a failure.
But these tests can be changed and make adding new language items a lot easier.
r? ```@jieyouxu```
import `simd_` intrinsics
In most cases, we can import the simd intrinsics rather than redeclare them. Apparently, most of these tests were written before `std::intrinsics::simd` existed.
There are a couple of exceptions where we can't yet import:
- the intrinsics are not declared as `const fn` in the standard library, causing issues in the `const-eval` tests
- the `simd_shuffle_generic` function is not exposed from `std::intrinsics`
- the `simd_fpow` and `simd_fpowi` functions are not exposed from `std::intrinsics` (removed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/137595)
- some tests use `no_core`, and therefore cannot use `std::intrinsics`
r? ```@RalfJung```
cc ```@workingjubilee``` do you have context on why some intrinsics are not exposed?
Fix (more) test directives that were accidentally ignored
Continuation of #137099 , caught by #137103 (and needed to unblock that one).
These test directives were accidentally using the old (`// ```@`)``` syntax
Update some comparison codegen tests now that they pass in LLVM20
Fixes#106107
Needed one tweak to the default `PartialOrd::le` to get the test to pass. Everything but the derived 2-field `le` test passes even without the change to the defaults in the trait.
Add FileCheck annotations to mir-opt/issues
This resolves a part of #116971 .
The directory `tests/mir-opt/issues` has only one test issue_75439.rs which should add FileCheck annotations.
Originally it was introduced in #75580 to confirm that there were duplicated basic blocks against or-patterns, but in #123067 the duplication was resolved. So FileCheck should ensure that there is no such duplication any more.
solver cycles are coinductive once they have one coinductive step
Implements the new cycle semantics in the new solver, dealing with the fallout from https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/10.
The first commit has been extensively fuzzed via https://github.com/lcnr/search_graph_fuzz.
A trait solver cycle is now coinductive if it has at least one *coinductive step*. A step is only considered coinductive if it's a where-clause of an impl of a coinductive trait. The only coinductive traits are `Sized` and auto traits.
This differs from the current stable because where a cycle had to consist of exclusively coinductive goals. This is overly limiting and wasn't properly enforced as it (mostly) ignored all non-trait goals.
A more in-depth explanation of my reasoning can be found in this separate doc: https://gist.github.com/lcnr/c49d887bbd34f5d05c36d1cf7a1bf5a5. A summary:
- imagine using dictionary passing style: map where-bounds to additional "dictonary" fn arguments instead of monomorphization
- impls are the only source of truth and introduce a *constructor* of the dictionary type
- a trait goal holds if mapping its proof tree to dictionary passing style results in a valid corecursive function
- a corecursive function is valid if it is guarded: matching on it should result in a constructor in a finite amount of time. This property should recursively hold for all fields of the constructor
- a function is guarded if the recursive call is *behind* a constructor
- **and** this constructor is not *moved out of*, e.g. by accessing a field of the dictionary
- the "not moved out of" condition is difficult to guarantee in general, e.g. for item bounds of associated types. However, there is no way to *move out* of an auto trait as there is no information you can get from *the inside of* an auto trait bound in the trait system
- if we encounter a cycle/recursive call which involves an auto trait, we can always convert the proof tree into a non-recursive function which calls a corecursive function whose first step is the construction of the auto trait dict and which only recursively depends on itself (by inlining the original function until they reach the uses of the auto trait)
**we can therefore make any cycle during which we step into an auto trait (or `Sized`) impl coinductive**
----
To fix https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/10 we could go with a more restrictive version which tries to restrict cycles to only allow code already supported on stable, potentially forcing cycles to be ambiguous if they step through an impl-where clause of a non-coinductive trait.
`PathKind` should be a strictly ordered set to allow merging paths without worry. We could therefore add another variant `PathKind::ForceUnknown` which is greater than `PathKind::Coinductive`. We already have to add such a third `PathKind` in #137314 anyways.
I am not doing this here due to multiple reasons:
- I cannot think of a principled reason why cycles using an impl to normalize differ in any way from simply using that impl to prove a trait bound. It feels unnecessary and like it makes it more difficult to reason about our cycle semantics :<
- This PR does not affect stable as coherence doesn't care about whether a goal holds or is ambiguous. So we don't yet have to make a final decision
r? `@compiler-errors` `@nikomatsakis`
fix: overflowing bin hex
**Overview:**
- This PR fixes#135404.
**Testing**
- Tested the updated functionality.
- previously emitted diagnostics:
```bash
error: literal out of range for `i32`
--> src/main.rs:2:9
|
2 | _ = 0x8FFF_FFFF_FFFF_FFFE;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: the literal `0x8FFF_FFFF_FFFF_FFFE` (decimal `10376293541461622782`) does not fit into the type `i32` and will become `-2i32`
= help: consider using the type `i128` instead
= note: `#[deny(overflowing_literals)]` on by default
help: to use as a negative number (decimal `-2`), consider using the type `u32` for the literal and cast it to `i32`
|
2 | _ = 0x8FFF_FFFF_FFFF_FFFEu32 as i32;
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
```
- current diagnostics:
```bash
error: literal out of range for `i32`
--> ../temp.rs:2:13
|
2 | let x = 0x8FFF_FFFF_FFFF_FFFE;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: the literal `0x8FFF_FFFF_FFFF_FFFE` (decimal `10376293541461622782`) does not fit into the type `i32` and will become `-2i32`
= help: consider using the type `u64` instead
= note: `#[deny(overflowing_literals)]` on by default
help: to use as a negative number (decimal `-2`), consider using the type `u64` for the literal and cast it to `i32`
|
2 | let x = 0x8FFF_FFFF_FFFF_FFFEu64 as i32;
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
```
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #136542 ([`compiletest`-related cleanups 4/7] Make the distinction between root build directory vs test suite specific build directory in compiletest less confusing)
- #136579 (Fix UB in ThinVec::flat_map_in_place)
- #136688 (require trait impls to have matching const stabilities as the traits)
- #136846 (Make `AssocOp` more like `ExprKind`)
- #137304 (add `IntoBounds::intersect` and `RangeBounds::is_empty`)
- #137455 (Reuse machinery from `tail_expr_drop_order` for `if_let_rescope`)
- #137480 (Return unexpected termination error instead of panicing in `Thread::join`)
- #137694 (Spruce up `AttributeKind` docs)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Provide a better suggestion message, and make the suggestion verbose.
```
error[E0703]: invalid ABI: found `riscv-interrupt`
--> $DIR/riscv-discoverability-guidance.rs:17:8
|
LL | extern "riscv-interrupt" fn isr() {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ invalid ABI
|
= note: invoke `rustc --print=calling-conventions` for a full list of supported calling conventions
help: there's a similarly named valid ABI `"riscv-interrupt-m"`
|
LL | extern "riscv-interrupt-m" fn isr() {}
| ++
```
Don't infer attributes of virtual calls based on the function body
Fixes (after backport) #137646.
Since we don't know the exact implementation of the virtual call, it might write to parameters, we can't infer the readonly attribute.
Note: there was an existing code path involving `Interpolated` in
`MetaItem::from_tokens` that was dead. This commit transfers that to the
new form, but puts an `unreachable!` call inside it.
The one notable test change is `tests/ui/macros/trace_faulty_macros.rs`.
This commit removes the complicated `Interpolated` handling in
`expected_expression_found` that results in a longer error message. But
I think the new, shorter message is actually an improvement.
The original complaint was in #71039, when the error message started
with "error: expected expression, found `1 + 1`". That was confusing
because `1 + 1` is an expression. Other than that, the reporter said
"the whole error message is not too bad if you ignore the first line".
Subsequently, extra complexity and wording was added to the error
message. But I don't think the extra wording actually helps all that
much. In particular, it still says of the `1+1` that "this is expected
to be expression". This repeats the problem from the original complaint!
This commit removes the extra complexity, reverting to a simpler error
message. This is primarily because the traversal is a pain without
`Interpolated` tokens. Nonetheless, I think the error message is
*improved*. It now starts with "expected expression, found `pat`
metavariable", which is much clearer and the real problem. It also
doesn't say anything specific about `1+1`, which is good, because the
`1+1` isn't really relevant to the error -- it's the `$e:pat` that's
important.
Reuse machinery from `tail_expr_drop_order` for `if_let_rescope`
Namely, it defines its own `extract_component_with_significant_dtor` which is a bit more accurate than `Ty::has_significant_drop`, since it has a hard-coded list of types from the ecosystem which are opted out of the lint.[^a]
Also, since we extract the dtors themselves, adopt the same *label* we use in `tail_expr_drop_order` to point out the destructor impl. This makes it much clear what's actually being dropped, so it should be clearer to know when it's a false positive.
This conflicts with #137444, but I will rebase whichever lands first.
[^a]: Side-note, it's kinda a shame that now there are two functions that presumably do the same thing. But this isn't my circus, nor are these my monkeys.
