Ensure that we never try to monomorphize the upcasting or vtable calls of impossible dyn types
Check for impossible obligations in the `dyn Trait` type we're trying to compute its the vtable upcasting and method call slots.
r? lcnr
Always compute coroutine layout for eagerly emitting recursive layout errors
Detect recursive coroutine layouts even if we don't detect opaque type recursion in the new solver. This is for two reasons:
1. It helps us detect (bad) recursive async function calls in the new solver, which due to its approach to normalization causes us to not detect this via a recursive RPIT (since the opaques are more eagerly revealed in the opaque body).
* Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/137.
2. It helps us detect (bad) recursive async functions behind AFITs. See the AFIT test that changed for the old solver too.
3. It also greatly simplifies the recursive impl trait check, since I can remove some jankness around how it handles coroutines.
Only highlight unmatchable parameters at the definition site
Followup to #136497
This generally results more focused messages in the same vein as #99635 (see `test/ui/argument-suggestions/complex.rs`). There are still some cases (e.g. `test/ui/argument-suggestions/permuted_arguments.rs`) where it might be worth highlighting the arguments. This is mitigated by the fact that a suggestion with a suggested rearrangement is given.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Pass spans around new solver
...so that when we instantiate canonical responses, we can actually have region obligations with the right span.
Within the solver itself, we still use dummy spans everywhere.
Most of these are meant to test possible future improvements, but since
they cover cases the existing test suite didn't, I figure including them
now may be helpful.
Arbitrary self types v2: recursion test
Add a test for infinite recursion of an arbitrary self type.
These diagnostics aren't perfect (especially the repetition of the statement that there's too much recursion) but for now at least let's add a test to confirm that such diagnostics are emitted.
As suggested by ```@oli-obk```
Relates to #44874
r? ```@wesleywiser```
implement inherent str constructors
implement #131114
this implements
- str::from_utf8
- str::from_utf8_mut
- str::from_utf8_unchecked
- str::from_utf8_unchecked_mut
i left `std::str::from_raw_parts` and `std::str::from_raw_parts_mut` out of this as those are unstable and were not mentioned by the tracking issue or the original pull request, but i can add those here as well.
i was also unsure of what to do with the `rustc_const_(un)stable` attributes: i removed the `#[rustc_const_stable]` attribute from `str::from_utf8`, `str::from_utf8_unchecked` and `str::from_utf8_unchecked_mut`, and left the`#[rust_const_unstable]` in `str::from_utf8_mut` (btw why is that one not const stable yet with #57349 merged?).
is there a way to redirect users to the stable `std::str::from_utf8` instead of only saying "hey this is unstable"?
for now i just removed the check for `str::from_utf8` in the test in `tests/ui/suggestions/suggest-std-when-using-type.rs`.
std: move network code into `sys`
As per #117276, this PR moves `sys_common::net` and the `sys::pal::net` into the newly created `sys::net` module. In order to support #135141, I've moved all the current network code into a separate `connection` module, future functions like `hostname` can live in separate modules.
I'll probably do a follow-up PR and clean up some of the actual code, this is mostly just a reorganization.
Reject negative literals for unsigned or char types in pattern ranges and literals
It sucks a bit that we have to duplicate the work here (normal expressions just get this for free from the `ExprKind::UnOp(UnOp::Neg, ...)` typeck logic.
In https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134228 I caused
```rust
fn main() {
match 42_u8 {
-10..255 => {},
_ => {}
}
}
```
to just compile without even a lint.
I can't believe we didn't have tests for this
Amusingly https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136302 will also register a delayed bug in `lit_to_const` for this, so we'll have a redundancy if something like this fails again.
Add a test for infinite recursion of an arbitrary self type.
These diagnostics aren't perfect (especially the repetition of the
statement that there's too much recursion) but for now at least
let's add a test to confirm that such diagnostics are emitted.
#[contracts::requires(...)] + #[contracts::ensures(...)]
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/128044
Updated contract support: attribute syntax for preconditions and postconditions, implemented via a series of desugarings that culminates in:
1. a compile-time flag (`-Z contract-checks`) that, similar to `-Z ub-checks`, attempts to ensure that the decision of enabling/disabling contract checks is delayed until the end user program is compiled,
2. invocations of lang-items that handle invoking the precondition, building a checker for the post-condition, and invoking that post-condition checker at the return sites for the function, and
3. intrinsics for the actual evaluation of pre- and post-condition predicates that third-party verification tools can intercept and reinterpret for their own purposes (e.g. creating shims of behavior that abstract away the function body and replace it solely with the pre- and post-conditions).
Known issues:
* My original intent, as described in the MCP (https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/759) was to have a rustc-prefixed attribute namespace (like rustc_contracts::requires). But I could not get things working when I tried to do rewriting via a rustc-prefixed builtin attribute-macro. So for now it is called `contracts::requires`.
* Our attribute macro machinery does not provide direct support for attribute arguments that are parsed like rust expressions. I spent some time trying to add that (e.g. something that would parse the attribute arguments as an AST while treating the remainder of the items as a token-tree), but its too big a lift for me to undertake. So instead I hacked in something approximating that goal, by semi-trivially desugaring the token-tree attribute contents into internal AST constucts. This may be too fragile for the long-term.
* (In particular, it *definitely* breaks when you try to add a contract to a function like this: `fn foo1(x: i32) -> S<{ 23 }> { ... }`, because its token-tree based search for where to inject the internal AST constructs cannot immediately see that the `{ 23 }` is within a generics list. I think we can live for this for the short-term, i.e. land the work, and continue working on it while in parallel adding a new attribute variant that takes a token-tree attribute alongside an AST annotation, which would completely resolve the issue here.)
* the *intent* of `-Z contract-checks` is that it behaves like `-Z ub-checks`, in that we do not prematurely commit to including or excluding the contract evaluation in upstream crates (most notably, `core` and `std`). But the current test suite does not actually *check* that this is the case. Ideally the test suite would be extended with a multi-crate test that explores the matrix of enabling/disabling contracts on both the upstream lib and final ("leaf") bin crates.
Remove unnecessary layout assertions for object-safe receivers
The soundness of `DispatchFromDyn` relies on the fact that, like all other built-in marker-like layout traits (e.g. `Sized`, `CoerceUnsized`), the guarantees that they enforce in *generic* code via traits will result in assumptions that we can rely on in codegen.
Specifically, `DispatchFromDyn` ensures that we end up with a receiver that is a valid pointer type, and its implementation validity recursively ensures that the ABI of that pointer type upholds the `Scalar` or `ScalarPair` representation for sized and unsized pointees, respectively.
The check that this layout guarantee holds for arbitrary, possibly generic receiver types that also may exist in possibly impossible-to-instantiate where clauses is overkill IMO, and leads to several ICEs due to the fact that computing layouts before monomorphization is going to be fallible at best.
This PR removes the check altogether, since it just exists as a sanity check from very long ago, 6f2a161b1b.
Fixes#125810Fixes#90110
This PR is an alternative to #136195. cc `@adetaylor.` I didn't realize in that PR that the layout checks that were being modified were simply *sanity checks*, rather than being actually necessary for soundness.
Report generic mismatches when calling bodyless trait functions
Don't know if there's an open issue for this. Just happened to notice this when working in that area.
The awkward extra spans added to the diagnostics of some tests (e.g. `trait-with-missing-associated-type-restriction`) is consistent with what happens for normal functions. Should probably be removed since that span doesn't seem to note anything useful.
First and third commit are both cleanups removing some unnecessary work. Second commit has the actual fix.
fixes#135124
Fix a couple NLL TLS spans
Some NLL TLS tests show incorrect spans for the end of function. It seems that the `TerminatorKind::Return` source info span can sometimes point at the single character after the end of the function.
Completely changing the span where the terminator is built also changes a bunch of diagnostics: small functions have more code shown unrelated to the errors at hand, wrapping symbols appear and weird-looking arrows point to the end of function, etc. So it seems this is somehow unexpectedly relied upon in making diagnostics look better and their heuristics.
So I just changed it where it matters for these few tests: the diagnostics specialized to conflict errors with thread locals.
r? `@matthewjasper`
Allow using named consts in pattern types
This required a refactoring first: I had to stop using `hir::Pat`in `hir::TyKind::Pat` and instead create a separate `TyPat` that has `ConstArg` for range ends instead of `PatExpr`. Within the type system we should be using `ConstArg` for all constants, as otherwise we'd be maintaining two separate const systems that could diverge. The big advantage of this PR is that we now inherit all the rules from const generics and don't have a separate system. While this makes things harder for users (const generic rules wrt what is allowed in those consts), it also means we don't accidentally allow some things like referring to assoc consts or doing math on generic consts.
Fix last compare-mode false negatives in tests
This PR is a continuation of #136310 and fixes the last remaining cases of false negatives when running tests under a compare-mode.
With these normalizations, all the compare-mode failures in `next-solver` (and `polonius`) should now be real, actual differences in diagnostics.
Implement unstable `new_range` feature
Switches `a..b`, `a..`, and `a..=b` to resolve to the new range types.
For rust-lang/rfcs#3550
Tracking issue #123741
also adds the re-export that was missed in the original implementation of `new_range_api`
Enable more tests on Windows
As part of the discussion of https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/822 on Zulip, it was mentioned that problems with the i686-pc-windows-gnu target may have resulted in tests being disabled on Windows.
So in this PR, I've ripped out all our `//@ ignore-windows` directives, then re-added all the ones that are definitely required based on the outcome of try-builds, and in some cases I've improved the justification or tightened the directives to `//@ ignore-msvc` or ignoring specific targets.
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #134807 (fix(rustdoc): always use a channel when linking to doc.rust-lang.org)
- #134814 (Add `kl` and `widekl` target features, and the feature gate)
- #135836 (bootstrap: only build `crt{begin,end}.o` when compiling to MUSL)
- #136022 (Port ui/simd tests to use the intrinsic macro)
- #136309 (set rustc dylib on manually constructed rustc command)
- #136462 (mir_build: Simplify `lower_pattern_range_endpoint`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
