Experimental feature gate for `super let`
This adds an experimental feature gate, `#![feature(super_let)]`, for the `super let` experiment.
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/139076
Liaison: ``@nikomatsakis``
## Description
There's a rough (inaccurate) description here: https://blog.m-ou.se/super-let/
In short, `super let` allows you to define something that lives long enough to be borrowed by the tail expression of the block. For example:
```rust
let a = {
super let b = temp();
&b
};
```
Here, `b` is extended to live as long as `a`, similar to how in `let a = &temp();`, the temporary will be extended to live as long as `a`.
## Properties
During the temporary lifetimes work we did last year, we explored the properties of "super let" and concluded that the fundamental property should be that these two are always equivalent in any context:
1. `& $expr`
2. `{ super let a = & $expr; a }`
And, additionally, that these are equivalent in any context when `$expr` is a temporary (aka rvalue):
1. `& $expr`
2. `{ super let a = $expr; & a }`
This makes it possible to give a name to a temporary without affecting how temporary lifetimes work, such that a macro can transparently use a block in its expansion, without that having any effect on the outside.
## Implementing pin!() correctly
With `super let`, we can properly implement the `pin!()` macro without hacks: ✨
```rust
pub macro pin($value:expr $(,)?) {
{
super let mut pinned = $value;
unsafe { $crate::pin::Pin::new_unchecked(&mut pinned) }
}
}
```
This is important, as there is currently no way to express it without hacks in Rust 2021 and before (see [hacky definition](2a06022951/library/core/src/pin.rs (L1947))), and no way to express it at all in Rust 2024 (see [issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/138718)).
## Fixing format_args!()
This will also allow us to express `format_args!()` in a way where one can assign the result to a variable, fixing a [long standing issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/92698):
```rust
let f = format_args!("Hello {name}!"); // error today, but accepted in the future! (after separate FCP)
```
## Experiment
The precise definition of `super let`, what happens for `super let x;` (without initializer), and whether to accept `super let _ = _ else { .. }` are still open questions, to be answered by the experiment.
Furthermore, once we have a more complete understanding of the feature, we might be able to come up with a better syntax. (Which could be just a different keywords, or an entirely different way of naming temporaries that doesn't involve a block and a (super) let statement.)
Add the new `amx` target features and the `movrs` target feature
Adds 5 new `amx` target features included in LLVM20. These are guarded under `x86_amx_intrinsics` (#126622)
- `amx-avx512`
- `amx-fp8`
- `amx-movrs`
- `amx-tf32`
- `amx-transpose`
Adds the `movrs` target feature (from #137976).
`@rustbot` label O-x86_64 O-x86_32 T-compiler A-target-feature
r? `@Amanieu`
remove `feature(inline_const_pat)`
Summarizing https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/144729-t-types/topic/remove.20feature.28inline_const_pat.29.20and.20shared.20borrowck.
With https://github.com/rust-lang/types-team/issues/129 we will start to borrowck items together with their typeck parent. This is necessary to correctly support opaque types, blocking the new solver and TAIT/ATPIT stabilization with the old one. This means that we cannot really support `inline_const_pat` as they are implemented right now:
- we want to typeck inline consts together with their parent body to allow inference to flow both ways and to allow the const to refer to local regions of its parent.This means we also need to borrowck the inline const together with its parent as that's necessary to properly support opaque types
- we want the inline const pattern to participate in exhaustiveness checking
- to participate in exhaustiveness checking we need to evaluate it, which requires borrowck, which now relies on borrowck of the typeck root, which ends up checking exhaustiveness again. **This is a query cycle**.
There are 4 possible ways to handle this:
- stop typechecking inline const patterns together with their parent
- causes inline const patterns to be different than inline const exprs
- prevents bidirectional inference, we need to either fail to compile `if let const { 1 } = 1u32` or `if let const { 1u32 } = 1`
- region inference for inline consts will be harder, it feels non-trivial to support inline consts referencing local regions from the parent fn
- inline consts no longer participate in exhaustiveness checking. Treat them like `pat if pat == const { .. }` instead. We then only evaluate them after borrowck
- difference between `const { 1 }` and `const FOO: usize = 1; match x { FOO => () }`. This is confusing
- do they carry their weight if they are now just equivalent to using an if-guard
- delay exhaustiveness checking until after borrowck
- should be possible in theory, but is a quite involved change and may have some unexpected challenges
- remove this feature for now
I believe we should either delay exhaustiveness checking or remove the feature entirely. As moving exhaustiveness checking to after borrow checking is quite complex I think the right course of action is to fully remove the feature for now and to add it again once/if we've got that implementation figured out.
`const { .. }`-expressions remain stable. These seem to have been the main motivation for https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues/2920.
r? types
cc `@rust-lang/types` `@rust-lang/lang` #76001
Stabilize `#![feature(precise_capturing_in_traits)]`
# Precise capturing (`+ use<>` bounds) in traits - Stabilization Report
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/130044.
## Stabilization summary
This report proposes the stabilization of `use<>` precise capturing bounds in return-position impl traits in traits (RPITITs). This completes a missing part of [RFC 3617 "Precise capturing"].
Precise capturing in traits was not ready for stabilization when the first subset was proposed for stabilization (namely, RPITs on free and inherent functions - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127672) since this feature has a slightly different implementation, and it hadn't yet been implemented or tested at the time. It is now complete, and the type system implications of this stabilization are detailed below.
## Motivation
Currently, RPITITs capture all in-scope lifetimes, according to the decision made in the ["lifetime capture rules 2024" RFC](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3498-lifetime-capture-rules-2024.html#return-position-impl-trait-in-trait-rpitit). However, traits can be designed such that some lifetimes in arguments may not want to be captured. There is currently no way to express this.
## Major design decisions since the RFC
No major decisions were made. This is simply an extension to the RFC that was understood as a follow-up from the original stabilization.
## What is stabilized?
Users may write `+ use<'a, T>` bounds on their RPITITs. This conceptually modifies the desugaring of the RPITIT to omit the lifetimes that we would copy over from the method. For example,
```rust
trait Foo {
fn method<'a>(&'a self) -> impl Sized;
// ... desugars to something like:
type RPITIT_1<'a>: Sized;
fn method_desugared<'a>(&'a self) -> Self::RPITIT_1<'a>;
// ... whereas with precise capturing ...
fn precise<'a>(&'a self) -> impl Sized + use<Self>;
// ... desugars to something like:
type RPITIT_2: Sized;
fn precise_desugared<'a>(&'a self) -> Self::RPITIT_2;
}
```
And thus the GAT doesn't name `'a`. In the compiler internals, it's not implemented exactly like this, but not in a way that users should expect to be able to observe.
#### Limitations on what generics must be captured
Currently, we require that all generics from the trait (including the `Self`) type are captured. This is because the generics from the trait are required to be *invariant* in order to do associated type normalization.
And like regular precise capturing bounds, all type and const generics in scope must be captured.
Thus, only the in-scope method lifetimes may be relaxed with this syntax today.
## What isn't stabilized? (a.k.a. potential future work)
See section above. Relaxing the requirement to capture all type and const generics in scope may be relaxed when https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/130043 is implemented, however it currently interacts with some underexplored corners of the type system (e.g. unconstrained type bivariance) so I don't expect it to come soon after.
## Implementation summary
This functionality is implemented analogously to the way that *opaque type* precise capturing works.
Namely, we currently use *variance* to model the capturedness of lifetimes. However, since RPITITs are anonymous GATs instead of opaque types, we instead modify the type relation of GATs to consider variances for RPITITs (along with opaque types which it has done since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103491).
30f168ef81/compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/util.rs (L954-L976)30f168ef81/compiler/rustc_type_ir/src/relate.rs (L240-L244)
Using variance to model capturedness is an implementation detail, and in the future it would be desirable if opaques and RPITITs simply did not include the uncaptured lifetimes in their generics. This can be changed in a forwards-compatible way, and almost certainly would not be observable by users (at least not negatively, since it may indeed fix some bugs along the way).
## Tests
* Test that the lifetime isn't actually captured: `tests/ui/impl-trait/precise-capturing/rpitit.rs` and `tests/ui/impl-trait/precise-capturing/rpitit-outlives.rs` and `tests/ui/impl-trait/precise-capturing/rpitit-outlives-2.rs`.
* Technical test for variance computation: `tests/ui/impl-trait/in-trait/variance.rs`.
* Test that you must capture all trait generics: `tests/ui/impl-trait/precise-capturing/forgot-to-capture-type.rs`.
* Test that you cannot capture more than what the trait specifies: `tests/ui/impl-trait/precise-capturing/rpitit-captures-more-method-lifetimes.rs` and `tests/ui/impl-trait/precise-capturing/rpitit-impl-captures-too-much.rs`.
* Undercapturing (refinement) lint: `tests/ui/impl-trait/in-trait/refine-captures.rs`.
### What other unstable features may be exposed by this feature?
I don't believe that this exposes any new unstable features indirectly.
## Remaining bugs and open issues
Not aware of any open issues or bugs.
## Tooling support
Rustfmt: ✅ Supports formatting `+ use<>` everywhere.
Clippy: ✅ No support needed, unless specific clippy lints are impl'd to care for precise capturing itself.
Rustdoc: ✅ Rendering `+ use<>` precise capturing bounds is supported.
Rust-analyzer: ✅ Parser support, and then lifetime support isn't needed https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138128#issuecomment-2705292494 (previous: ~~❓ There is parser support, but I am unsure of rust-analyzer's level of support for RPITITs in general.~~)
## History
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/130044
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/131033
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/132795
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136554
add `naked_functions_target_feature` unstable feature
tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/138568
tagging https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134213https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90957
This PR puts `#[target_feature(/* ... */)]` on `#[naked]` functions behind its own feature gate, so that naked functions can be stabilized. It turns out that supporting `target_feature` on naked functions is tricky on some targets, so we're splitting it out to not block stabilization of naked functions themselves. See the tracking issue for more information and workarounds.
Note that at the time of writing, the `target_features` attribute is ignored when generating code for naked functions.
r? ``@Amanieu``
Stabilize `asm_goto` feature gate
Stabilize `asm_goto` feature (tracked by #119364). The issue will remain open and be updated to track `asm_goto_with_outputs`.
Reference PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1693
# Stabilization Report
This feature adds a `label <block>` operand type to `asm!`. `<block>` must be a block expression with type unit or never. The address of the block is substituted and the assembly may jump to the block. When block completes the `asm!` block returns and continues execution.
The block starts a new safety context and unsafe operations within must have additional `unsafe`s; the effect of `unsafe` that surrounds `asm!` block is cancelled. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/119364#issuecomment-2316037703 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/131544.
It's currently forbidden to use `asm_goto` with output operands; that is still unstable under `asm_goto_with_outputs`.
Example:
```rust
unsafe {
asm!(
"jmp {}",
label {
println!("Jumped from asm!");
}
);
}
```
Tests:
- tests/ui/asm/x86_64/goto.rs
- tests/ui/asm/x86_64/goto-block-safe.stderr
- tests/ui/asm/x86_64/bad-options.rs
- tests/codegen/asm/goto.rs
I can't find any dedicated tests that actually exercises the stability
gating (via `-Z unstable-options`) of print requests, so here's a
dedicated one.
I coalesced `tests/ui/feature-gates/feature-gate-print-check-cfg.rs`
into this test, because AFAICT that print request is not feature gated,
but only `-Z unstable-options`-gated just like other unstable print
requests.
Add `#[define_opaques]` attribute and require it for all type-alias-impl-trait sites that register a hidden type
Instead of relying on the signature of items to decide whether they are constraining an opaque type, the opaque types that the item constrains must be explicitly listed.
A previous version of this PR used an actual attribute, but had to keep the resolved `DefId`s in a side table.
Now we just lower to fields in the AST that have no surface syntax, instead a builtin attribute macro fills in those fields where applicable.
Note that for convenience referencing opaque types in associated types from associated methods on the same impl will not require an attribute. If that causes problems `#[defines()]` can be used to overwrite the default of searching for opaques in the signature.
One wart of this design is that closures and static items do not have generics. So since I stored the opaques in the generics of functions, consts and methods, I would need to add a custom field to closures and statics to track this information. During a T-types discussion we decided to just not do this for now.
fixes#131298
Rollup of 17 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #137827 (Add timestamp to unstable feature usage metrics)
- #138041 (bootstrap and compiletest: Use `size_of_val` from the prelude instead of imported)
- #138046 (trim channel value in `get_closest_merge_commit`)
- #138053 (Increase the max. custom try jobs requested to `20`)
- #138061 (triagebot: add a `compiler_leads` ad-hoc group)
- #138064 (Remove - from xtensa targets cpu names)
- #138075 (Use final path segment for diagnostic)
- #138078 (Reduce the noise of bootstrap changelog warnings in --dry-run mode)
- #138081 (Move `yield` expressions behind their own feature gate)
- #138090 (`librustdoc`: flatten nested ifs)
- #138092 (Re-add `DynSend` and `DynSync` impls for `TyCtxt`)
- #138094 (a small borrowck cleanup)
- #138098 (Stabilize feature `const_copy_from_slice`)
- #138103 (Git ignore citool's target directory)
- #138105 (Fix broken link to Miri intrinsics in documentation)
- #138108 (Mention me (WaffleLapkin) when changes to `rustc_codegen_ssa` occur)
- #138117 ([llvm/PassWrapper] use `size_t` when building arg strings)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Implement `&pin const self` and `&pin mut self` sugars
This PR implements part of #130494.
It introduces the sugars `&pin const self` and `&pin mut self` for `self: Pin<&Self>` and `self: Pin<&mut Self>`.
mgca: Lower all const paths as `ConstArgKind::Path`
When `#![feature(min_generic_const_args)]` is enabled, we now lower all
const paths in generic arg position to `hir::ConstArgKind::Path`. We
then lower assoc const paths to `ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated` since we
can no longer use the anon const expression lowering machinery. In the
process of implementing this, I factored out `hir_ty_lowering` code that
is now shared between lowering assoc types and assoc consts.
This PR also introduces a `#[type_const]` attribute for trait assoc
consts that are allowed as const args. However, we still need to
implement code to check that assoc const definitions satisfy
`#[type_const]` if present (basically is it a const path or a
monomorphic anon const).
r? `@BoxyUwU`
Support raw-dylib link kind on ELF
raw-dylib is a link kind that allows rustc to link against a library without having any library files present.
This currently only exists on Windows. rustc will take all the symbols from raw-dylib link blocks and put them in an import library, where they can then be resolved by the linker.
While import libraries don't exist on ELF, it would still be convenient to have this same functionality. Not having the libraries present at build-time can be convenient for several reasons, especially cross-compilation. With raw-dylib, code linking against a library can be cross-compiled without needing to have these libraries available on the build machine. If the libc crate makes use of this, it would allow cross-compilation without having any libc available on the build machine. This is not yet possible with this implementation, at least against libc's like glibc that use symbol versioning. The raw-dylib kind could be extended with support for symbol versioning in the future.
This implementation is very experimental and I have not tested it very well. I have tested it for a toy example and the lz4-sys crate, where it was able to successfully link a binary despite not having a corresponding library at build-time.
I was inspired by Björn's comments in https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/bundle-zig-cc-in-rustup-by-default/22096/27
Tracking issue: #135694
r? bjorn3
try-job: aarch64-apple
try-job: x86_64-msvc-1
try-job: x86_64-msvc-2
try-job: test-various
When `#![feature(min_generic_const_args)]` is enabled, we now lower all
const paths in generic arg position to `hir::ConstArgKind::Path`. We
then lower assoc const paths to `ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated` since we
can no longer use the anon const expression lowering machinery. In the
process of implementing this, I factored out `hir_ty_lowering` code that
is now shared between lowering assoc types and assoc consts.
This PR also introduces a `#[type_const]` attribute for trait assoc
consts that are allowed as const args. However, we still need to
implement code to check that assoc const definitions satisfy
`#[type_const]` if present (basically is it a const path or a
monomorphic anon const).
Rollup of 12 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #135767 (Future incompatibility warning `unsupported_fn_ptr_calling_conventions`: Also warn in dependencies)
- #137852 (Remove layouting dead code for non-array SIMD types.)
- #137863 (Fix pretty printing of unsafe binders)
- #137882 (do not build additional stage on compiler paths)
- #137894 (Revert "store ScalarPair via memset when one side is undef and the other side can be memset")
- #137902 (Make `ast::TokenKind` more like `lexer::TokenKind`)
- #137921 (Subtree update of `rust-analyzer`)
- #137922 (A few cleanups after the removal of `cfg(not(parallel))`)
- #137939 (fix order on shl impl)
- #137946 (Fix docker run-local docs)
- #137955 (Always allow rustdoc-json tests to contain long lines)
- #137958 (triagebot.toml: Don't label `test/rustdoc-json` as A-rustdoc-search)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Implement `#[cfg]` in `where` clauses
This PR implements #115590, which supports `#[cfg]` attributes in `where` clauses.
The biggest change is, that it adds `AttrsVec` and `NodeId` to the `ast::WherePredicate` and `HirId` to the `hir::WherePredicate`.
Introduce `feature(generic_const_parameter_types)`
Allows to define const generic parameters whose type depends on other generic parameters, e.g. `Foo<const N: usize, const ARR: [u8; N]>;`
Wasn't going to implement for this for a while until we could implement it with `bad_inference.rs` resolved but apparently the project simd folks would like to be able to use this for some intrinsics and the inference issue isn't really a huge problem there aiui. (cc ``@workingjubilee`` )
raw-dylib is a link kind that allows rustc to link against a library
without having any library files present.
This currently only exists on Windows. rustc will take all the symbols
from raw-dylib link blocks and put them in an import library, where they
can then be resolved by the linker.
While import libraries don't exist on ELF, it would still be convenient
to have this same functionality. Not having the libraries present at
build-time can be convenient for several reasons, especially
cross-compilation. With raw-dylib, code linking against a library can be
cross-compiled without needing to have these libraries available on the
build machine. If the libc crate makes use of this, it would allow
cross-compilation without having any libc available on the build
machine. This is not yet possible with this implementation, at least
against libc's like glibc that use symbol versioning.
The raw-dylib kind could be extended with support for symbol versioning
in the future.
This implementation is very experimental and I have not tested it very
well. I have tested it for a toy example and the lz4-sys crate, where it
was able to successfully link a binary despite not having a
corresponding library at build-time.
