For PGO/coverage tests that don't need to build or run an actual artifact, we
can use `-Zno-profiler-runtime` to run the test even when the profiler runtime
is not available.
Migrate `run-make/pgo-branch-weights` to `rmake`
Part of #121876 and the associated [Google Summer of Code project](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2024/05/01/gsoc-2024-selected-projects.html).
This is a scary one and I expect things to break. Set as draft, because this isn't ready.
- [x] There is this comment here, which suggests the test is excluded from the testing process due to a platform specific issue? I can't see anything here that would cause this test to not run...
> // FIXME(mati865): MinGW GCC miscompiles compiler-rt profiling library but with Clang it works
// properly. Since we only have GCC on the CI ignore the test for now."
EDIT: This is specific to Windows-gnu.
- [x] The Makefile has this line:
```
ifneq (,$(findstring x86,$(TARGET)))
COMMON_FLAGS=-Clink-args=-fuse-ld=gold
```
I honestly can't tell whether this is checking if the target IS x86, or IS NOT. EDIT: It's checking if it IS x86.
- [x] I don't know why the Makefile was trying to pass an argument directly in the Makefile instead of setting that "aaaaaaaaaaaa2bbbbbbbbbbbb2bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbcc" input as a variable in the Rust program directly. I changed that, let me know if that was wrong.
- [x] Trying to rewrite `cat "$(TMPDIR)/interesting.ll" | "$(LLVM_FILECHECK)" filecheck-patterns.txt` resulted in some butchery. For starters, in `tools.mk`, LLVM_FILECHECK corrects its own backslashes on Windows distributions, but there is no further mention of it, so I assume this is a preset environment variable... but is it really? Then, the command itself uses a Standard Input and a passed input file as an argument simultaneously, according to the [documentation](https://llvm.org/docs/CommandGuide/FileCheck.html#synopsis).
try-job: aarch64-gnu
run-make-support: add wrapper for `fs` operations
Suggested by #125728.
The point of this wrapper is to stop silent fails caused by forgetting to `unwrap` `fs` functions. However, functions like `fs::read` which return something and get stored in a variable should cause a failure on their own if they are not unwrapped (as the `Result` will be stored in the variable, and something will be done on that `Result` that should have been done to its contents). Is it still pertinent to wrap `fs::read_to_string`, `fs::metadata` and so on?
Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/125728
try-job: x86_64-msvc
try-job: i686-mingw
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #126186 (Migrate `run-make/multiple-emits` to `rmake.rs`)
- #126236 (Delegation: fix ICE on recursive delegation)
- #126254 (Remove ignore-cross-compile directive from ui/macros/proc_macro)
- #126258 (Do not define opaque types when selecting impls)
- #126265 (interpret: ensure we check bool/char for validity when they are used in a cast)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
run-make: arm command wrappers with drop bombs
This PR is one in a series of cleanups to run-make tests and the run-make-support library.
### Summary
It's easy to forget to actually executed constructed command wrappers, e.g. `rustc().input("foo.rs")` but forget the `run()`, so to help catch these mistakes, we arm command wrappers with drop bombs on construction to force them to be executed by test code.
This PR also removes the `Deref`/`DerefMut` impl for our custom `Command` which derefs to `std::process::Command` because it can cause issues when trying to use a custom command:
```rs
htmldocck().arg().run()
```
fails to compile because the `arg()` is resolved to `std::process::Command::arg`, which returns `&mut std::process::Command` that doesn't have a `run()` command.
This PR also:
- Removes `env_var` on the `impl_common_helper` macro that was wrongly named and is a footgun (no users).
- Bumps the run-make-support library to version `0.1.0`.
- Adds a changelog to the support library.
### Details
Especially for command wrappers like `Rustc`, it's very easy to build up
a command invocation but forget to actually execute it, e.g. by using
`run()`. This commit adds "drop bombs" to command wrappers, which are
armed on command wrapper construction, and only defused if the command
is executed (through `run`, `run_fail`).
If the test writer forgets to execute the command, the drop bomb will
"explode" and panic with an error message. This is so that tests don't
silently pass with constructed-but-not-executed command wrappers.
This PR is best reviewed commit-by-commit.
try-job: x86_64-msvc
run-make: add `run_in_tmpdir` self-test
Add a basic sanity test for `run_in_tmpdir` to make sure that files (including read-only files) and directories created inside the "scratch" tmpdir are removed after the closure returns.
r? ghost (while i run a try job)
try-job: x86_64-msvc
migrate tests/run-make/llvm-outputs to use rmake.rs
part of #121876
<!--
If this PR is related to an unstable feature or an otherwise tracked effort,
please link to the relevant tracking issue here. If you don't know of a related
tracking issue or there are none, feel free to ignore this.
This PR will get automatically assigned to a reviewer. In case you would like
a specific user to review your work, you can assign it to them by using
r? <reviewer name>
-->
Adds --remap-path-prefix as an unstable option. This is implemented to
mimic the behavior of rustc's --remap-path-prefix but with minor
adjustments.
This flag similarly takes in two paths, a prefix to replace and a
replacement string.
Change how runmake v2 tests are executed
This PR makes execution of v2 runmake tests more sane, by executing each test in a temporary directory by default, rather than running it inside `tests/run-make`. This will have.. a lot of conflicts.
Fixes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/126080
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/125726, because it removes `tmp_dir`, lol.
r? `@jieyouxu`
try-job: x86_64-msvc
Clean up source root in run-make tests
The name `S` isn't exactly the most descriptive, and we also shouldn't need to pass it when building (actually I think that most of the env. vars that we pass to `cargo` here are probably not really needed).
Related issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/126071
r? ```@jieyouxu```
Remove `same-lib-two-locations-no-panic` run-make test
This test doesn't really make any sense anymore, it became broken a long time ago.
r? ``@jieyouxu``
Rollup of 12 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #125220 (Repair several `riscv64gc-unknown-linux-gnu` codegen tests)
- #126033 (CI: fix publishing of toolstate history)
- #126034 (Clarify our tier 1 Windows Server support)
- #126035 (Some minor query system cleanups)
- #126051 (Clarify an `x fmt` error.)
- #126059 (Raise `DEFAULT_MIN_STACK_SIZE` to at least 64KiB)
- #126064 (Migrate `run-make/manual-crate-name` to `rmake.rs`)
- #126072 (compiletest: Allow multiple `//@ run-flags:` headers)
- #126073 (Port `tests/run-make-fulldeps/obtain-borrowck` to ui-fulldeps)
- #126081 (Do not use relative paths to Rust source root in run-make tests)
- #126086 (use windows compatible executable name for libcxx-version)
- #126096 ([RFC-2011] Allow `core_intrinsics` when activated)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
