Allow Rust to use a number of libc filesystem calls
This allows Rust on Fuchsia to use a number of function calls from libc:
* dirfd
* fdatasync
* flock with LOCK_EX, LOCK_SH, LOCK_NB, LOCK_UN
* fstatat
cc #120426
try-job: dist-various-2
Windows: remove readonly files
When calling `remove_file`, we shouldn't fail to delete readonly files. As the test makes clear, this make the Windows behaviour consistent with other platforms. This also makes us internally consistent with `remove_dir_all`.
try-job: x86_64-msvc-ext1
Because the neutral element of `<fNN as iter::Sum>` was changed to
`neg_zero`, the documentation needed to be updated, as it was reporting
inadequate information about what should be expected from the return.
Co-authored-by: Jubilee <workingjubilee@gmail.com>
Optimize `Rc::<str>::default()` implementation
This PR lets `impl Default for Rc<str>` re-use the implementation for `Rc::<[u8]>::default()`. The previous version only calculted the memory layout at runtime, even though it should be known at compile time, resulting in an additional function call.
The same optimization is done for `Rc<CStr>`.
Generated byte code: <https://godbolt.org/z/dfq73jsoP>.
Resolves <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/135784>.
Cc `@Billy-Sheppard.`
std: move `io` module out of `pal`, get rid of `sys_common::io`
Part of #117276.
This does two related things:
1. It moves the platform-specific definitions for `IoSlice`, `IoSliceMut` and `is_terminal` out of `pal` and into `sys` and unifies some of them.
2. It gets rid of `sys_common::io`, moving the non-platform-specific test helpers into `std::test_helpers` and the buffer size definition to the new `sys::io` module.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #135179 (Make sure to use `Receiver` trait when extracting object method candidate)
- #136554 (Add `opt_alias_variances` and use it in outlives code)
- #136556 ([AIX] Update tests/ui/wait-forked-but-failed-child.rs to accomodate exiting and idle processes.)
- #136589 (Enable "jump to def" feature on rustc docs)
- #136615 (sys: net: Add UEFI stubs)
- #136635 (Remove outdated `base_port` calculation in std net test)
- #136682 (Move two windows process tests to tests/ui)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Move two windows process tests to tests/ui
Spawning processes from std unit tests is not something it's well suited for so moving them into tests/ui is more robust and means we don't need to hack around `cmd.exe`.
Follow up to #136630
Remove outdated `base_port` calculation in std net test
This was never modified since `std::net` was originally introduced in 395709ca6d, when at that time, each CI runner was running multiple jobs concurrently. This seems to have originally caused issues with jobs fighting over the same ports. This is not the case in the current CI infrastructure, so remove this relic in favor of a simple constant base port number.
I double-checked `19600` and nearby port numbers, and this isn't a well-known port number AFAICT[^1].
Closes#136633.
[^1]: At the time of writing.
sys: net: Add UEFI stubs
- Just a copy of sys/net/unsupported.
- Will make the future net PRs easier to review.
- The reason for a separate folder instead of standalone file is that UEFI has separate the protocols for v4 and v6, and thus will need some abstractions to implement the Rust interface.
r? ``@jhpratt``
Remove some unnecessary parens in `assert!` conditions
While working on #122661, some of these started triggering our "unnecessary parens" lints due to a change in the `assert!` desugaring. A cursory search identified a few more. Some of these have been carried from before 1.0, were a bulk rename from the previous name of `assert!` left them in that state. I went and removed as many of these unnecessary parens as possible in order to have fewer annoyances in the future if we make the lint smarter.
Using if ... with the intent to avoid branches can be surprising to readers and
carries the risk of turning into jumps/branches generated by some future
compiler version, breaking crucial optimizations.
This commit replaces their usage with the explicit and IR annotated
`bool::select_unpredictable`.
While working on #122661, some of these started triggering our "unnecessary parens" lints due to a change in the `assert!` desugaring. A cursory search identified a few more. Some of these have been carried from before 1.0, were a bulk rename from the previous name of `assert!` left them in that state. I went and removed as many of these unnecessary parens as possible in order to have fewer annoyances in the future if we make the lint smarter.
Change two std process tests to not output to std{out,err}, and fix test suite stat reset in bootstrap CI test rendering
I don't really know how to test if this unbreaks CI (since #136607 reported that this breaks the CI test rendering *sometimes*).
Fixes#136607.
r? `@ChrisDenton` (two Windows process tests, but feel free to reroll)
This was never modified since `std::net` was originally introduced, when
each CI job was running multiple jobs concurrently which caused issues
with fighting over the same ports. This is not the case in the current
CI infrastructure, so remove this relic.
Fix `unreachable_pub` lint for hermit target
The build for the hermit target (`#[cfg(target_os = "hermit")]`) fails on master as of [8df89d1cb0](8df89d1cb0) (2025-02-05), due to introducing `#[warn(unreachable_pub)]` at the root in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134286 (Enable unreachable_pub lint in core, merged 2025-01-20).
Make the relevant visibility modifiers more specific to resolve the warning.
```
$ ./x build --target x86_64-unknown-hermit
Building bootstrap
Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized] target(s) in 0.34s
Building stage0 library artifacts (x86_64-apple-darwin)
Finished `release` profile [optimized] target(s) in 0.15s
Building compiler artifacts (stage0 -> stage1, x86_64-apple-darwin)
Finished `release` profile [optimized] target(s) in 1.67s
Creating a sysroot for stage1 compiler (use `rustup toolchain link 'name' build/host/stage1`)
Building stage1 library artifacts {alloc, core, panic_abort, panic_unwind, proc_macro, std, sysroot, test, unwind} (x86_64-apple-darwin -> x86_64-unknown-hermit)
Compiling panic_unwind v0.0.0 (library/panic_unwind)
error: unreachable `pub` item
--> library/panic_unwind/src/hermit.rs:10:9
|
10 | pub fn __rust_abort() -> !;
| ---^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
| |
| help: consider restricting its visibility: `pub(crate)`
|
= help: or consider exporting it for use by other crates
= note: `-D unreachable-pub` implied by `-D warnings`
= help: to override `-D warnings` add `#[allow(unreachable_pub)]`
error: unreachable `pub` item
--> library/panic_unwind/src/hermit.rs:17:9
|
17 | pub fn __rust_abort() -> !;
| ---^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
| |
| help: consider restricting its visibility: `pub(crate)`
|
= help: or consider exporting it for use by other crates
error: could not compile `panic_unwind` (lib) due to 2 previous errors
Build completed unsuccessfully in 0:00:39
```
Rename `slice::take...` methods to `split_off...`
This rename was discussed and recommended in a recent t-libs meeting.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/62280
There's an additional commit here which modifies internals of unstable `OneSidedRange` APIs in order to implement `split_off` methods in a panic-free way (remove `unreachable!()`) as recommended in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/88502/files#r760177240. I can split this out into a separate PR if needed.
implement inherent str constructors
implement #131114
this implements
- str::from_utf8
- str::from_utf8_mut
- str::from_utf8_unchecked
- str::from_utf8_unchecked_mut
i left `std::str::from_raw_parts` and `std::str::from_raw_parts_mut` out of this as those are unstable and were not mentioned by the tracking issue or the original pull request, but i can add those here as well.
i was also unsure of what to do with the `rustc_const_(un)stable` attributes: i removed the `#[rustc_const_stable]` attribute from `str::from_utf8`, `str::from_utf8_unchecked` and `str::from_utf8_unchecked_mut`, and left the`#[rust_const_unstable]` in `str::from_utf8_mut` (btw why is that one not const stable yet with #57349 merged?).
is there a way to redirect users to the stable `std::str::from_utf8` instead of only saying "hey this is unstable"?
for now i just removed the check for `str::from_utf8` in the test in `tests/ui/suggestions/suggest-std-when-using-type.rs`.
std: move network code into `sys`
As per #117276, this PR moves `sys_common::net` and the `sys::pal::net` into the newly created `sys::net` module. In order to support #135141, I've moved all the current network code into a separate `connection` module, future functions like `hostname` can live in separate modules.
I'll probably do a follow-up PR and clean up some of the actual code, this is mostly just a reorganization.
uefi: process: Add support for command environment variables
Set environment variables before launching the process and restore the prior variables after the program exists.
This is the same implementation as the one used by UEFI Shell Execute [0].
[0]: 2d2642f483/ShellPkg/Application/Shell/ShellProtocol.c (L1700)
Mark `std::fmt::from_fn` as `#[must_use]`
While working on #135494 I managed to shoot my own foot a few times by forgetting to actually use the result of `fmt::from_fn`, so I think a `#[must_use]` could be appropriate!
Didn't have a good message to put in the attr so left it blank, still unstable so we can come back to it I guess?
cc #117729 (and a huge +1 for getting it stabilized, it's very useful IMHO)
#[contracts::requires(...)] + #[contracts::ensures(...)]
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/128044
Updated contract support: attribute syntax for preconditions and postconditions, implemented via a series of desugarings that culminates in:
1. a compile-time flag (`-Z contract-checks`) that, similar to `-Z ub-checks`, attempts to ensure that the decision of enabling/disabling contract checks is delayed until the end user program is compiled,
2. invocations of lang-items that handle invoking the precondition, building a checker for the post-condition, and invoking that post-condition checker at the return sites for the function, and
3. intrinsics for the actual evaluation of pre- and post-condition predicates that third-party verification tools can intercept and reinterpret for their own purposes (e.g. creating shims of behavior that abstract away the function body and replace it solely with the pre- and post-conditions).
Known issues:
* My original intent, as described in the MCP (https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/759) was to have a rustc-prefixed attribute namespace (like rustc_contracts::requires). But I could not get things working when I tried to do rewriting via a rustc-prefixed builtin attribute-macro. So for now it is called `contracts::requires`.
* Our attribute macro machinery does not provide direct support for attribute arguments that are parsed like rust expressions. I spent some time trying to add that (e.g. something that would parse the attribute arguments as an AST while treating the remainder of the items as a token-tree), but its too big a lift for me to undertake. So instead I hacked in something approximating that goal, by semi-trivially desugaring the token-tree attribute contents into internal AST constucts. This may be too fragile for the long-term.
* (In particular, it *definitely* breaks when you try to add a contract to a function like this: `fn foo1(x: i32) -> S<{ 23 }> { ... }`, because its token-tree based search for where to inject the internal AST constructs cannot immediately see that the `{ 23 }` is within a generics list. I think we can live for this for the short-term, i.e. land the work, and continue working on it while in parallel adding a new attribute variant that takes a token-tree attribute alongside an AST annotation, which would completely resolve the issue here.)
* the *intent* of `-Z contract-checks` is that it behaves like `-Z ub-checks`, in that we do not prematurely commit to including or excluding the contract evaluation in upstream crates (most notably, `core` and `std`). But the current test suite does not actually *check* that this is the case. Ideally the test suite would be extended with a multi-crate test that explores the matrix of enabling/disabling contracts on both the upstream lib and final ("leaf") bin crates.
