Make `min_exhaustive_patterns` match `exhaustive_patterns` better
Split off from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120742.
There remained two edge cases where `min_exhaustive_patterns` wasn't behaving like `exhaustive_patterns`. This fixes them, and tests the feature in a bunch more cases. I essentially went through all uses of `exhaustive_patterns` to see which ones would be interesting to compare between the two features.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #119592 (resolve: Unload speculatively resolved crates before freezing cstore)
- #120103 (Make it so that async-fn-in-trait is compatible with a concrete future in implementation)
- #120206 (hir: Make sure all `HirId`s have corresponding HIR `Node`s)
- #120214 (match lowering: consistently lower bindings deepest-first)
- #120688 (GVN: also turn moves into copies with projections)
- #120702 (docs: also check the inline stmt during redundant link check)
- #120727 (exhaustiveness: Prefer "`0..MAX` not covered" to "`_` not covered")
- #120734 (Add `SubdiagnosticMessageOp` as a trait alias.)
- #120739 (improve pretty printing for associated items in trait objects)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
improve pretty printing for associated items in trait objects
* Don't print a binder in front of associated items, because it's not valid syntax.
* e.g. print `dyn for<'a> Trait<'a, Assoc = &'a u8>` instead of `dyn for<'a> Trait<'a, for<'a> Assoc = &'a u8>`.
* Don't print associated items that are implied by a supertrait bound.
* e.g. if we have `trait Sub: Super<Assoc = u8> {}`, then just print `dyn Sub` instead of `dyn Sub<Assoc = u8>`.
I've added the test in the first commit, so you can see the diff of the compiler output in the second commit.
exhaustiveness: Prefer "`0..MAX` not covered" to "`_` not covered"
There was an exception when reporting integer ranges as missing, it's been there for as long as I can remember. This PR removes it. I think it's nicer to report "`0..MAX` not covered" than "`_` not covered". This also makes it consistent with enums, where we report individual enum variants in this case (as showcased in the rest of the `empty-match.rs` test).
r? ``@estebank``
docs: also check the inline stmt during redundant link check
Fixes#120444
This issue was brought about by querying `root::webdavfs::A`, a key that doesn't exist in `doc_link_resolutions`. To avoid a panic, I've altered the gating mechanism to allow this lint pass to be skipped.
I'm not certain if this is the best solution. An alternative approach might be to leverage other info from the name resolutions instead of `doc_link_resolutions`. After all, all we need is to get the resolution from a combination of `(module, name)`. However, I believe they would yield the same outcome, both skipping this lint.
match lowering: consistently lower bindings deepest-first
Currently when lowering match expressions to MIR, we do a funny little dance with the order of bindings. I attempt to explain it in the third commit: we handle refutable (i.e. needing a test) patterns differently than irrefutable ones. This leads to inconsistencies, as reported in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120210. The reason we need a dance at all is for situations like:
```rust
fn foo1(x: NonCopyStruct) {
let y @ NonCopyStruct { copy_field: z } = x;
// the above should turn into
let z = x.copy_field;
let y = x;
}
```
Here the `y ```````@```````` binding will move out of `x`, so we need to copy the field first.
I believe that the inconsistency came about when we fixed https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/69971, and didn't notice that the fix didn't extend to refutable patterns. My guess then is that ordering bindings by "deepest-first, otherwise source order" is a sound choice. This PR implements that (at least I hope, match lowering is hard to follow 🥲).
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120210
r? ```````@oli-obk``````` since you merged the original fix to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/69971
cc ```````@matthewjasper```````
Make it so that async-fn-in-trait is compatible with a concrete future in implementation
There's no technical reason why an AFIT like `async fn foo()` cannot be satisfied with an implementation signature like `fn foo() -> Pin<Box<dyn Future<Output = ()> + 'static>>`.
We rejected this previously because we were uncertain about how AFITs worked with refinement, but I don't believe this needs to be a restriction any longer.
r? oli-obk
resolve: Unload speculatively resolved crates before freezing cstore
Name resolution sometimes loads additional crates to improve diagnostics (e.g. suggest imports).
Not all of these diagnostics result in errors, sometimes they are just warnings, like in #117772.
If additional crates loaded speculatively stay and gets listed by things like `query crates` then they may produce further errors like duplicated lang items, because lang items from speculatively loaded crates are as good as from non-speculatively loaded crates.
They can probably do things like adding unintended impls from speculatively loaded crates to method resolution as well.
The extra crates will also get into the crate's metadata as legitimate dependencies.
In this PR I remove the speculative crates from cstore when name resolution is finished and cstore is frozen.
This is better than e.g. filtering away speculative crates in `query crates` because things like `DefId`s referring to these crates and leaking to later compilation stages can produce ICEs much easier, allowing to detect them.
The unloading could potentially be skipped if any errors were reported (to allow using `DefId`s from speculatively loaded crates for recovery), but I didn't do it in this PR because I haven't seen such cases of recovery. We can reconsider later if any relevant ICEs are reported.
Unblocks https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117772.
Stop bailing out from compilation just because there were incoherent traits
fixes#120343
but also has a lot of "type annotations needed" fallout. Some are fixed in the second commit.
Make `NonZero` constructors generic.
This makes `NonZero` constructors generic, so that `NonZero::new` can be used without turbofish syntax.
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120257
~~I cannot figure out how to make this work with `const` traits. Not sure if I'm using it wrong or whether there's a bug:~~
```rust
101 | if n == T::ZERO {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected `host`, found `true`
|
= note: expected constant `host`
found constant `true`
```
r? `@dtolnay`
Reconstify `Add`
r? project-const-traits
I'm not happy with the ui test changes (or failures because I did not bless them and include the diffs in this PR). There is at least some bugs I need to look and try fix:
1. A third duplicated diagnostic when a consumer crate that does not have `effects` enabled has a trait selection error for an upstream const_trait trait. See tests/ui/ufcs/ufcs-qpath-self-mismatch.rs.
2. For some reason, making `Add` a const trait would stop us from suggesting `T: Add` when we try to add two `T`s without that bound. See tests/ui/suggestions/issue-97677.rs
Record coroutine kind in coroutine generics
Oops, added a new substitution (the "kind" ty) to coroutines but forgot to record it in the `generics_of`. I'm surprised I left this out of the coroutine-closure PR -- I thought I made this change; I possibly rebased it out by accident.
Fixes#120732
r? oli-obk
Add parallel rustc ui tests
Updates #118698
Add some ui tests for parallel rustc front end
This is a relatively large feature so I think it's worth creating a new entity in tests/ui folder, so we need to modify the limit in tidy.
Suggest turning `if let` into irrefutable `let` if appropriate
When encountering an `if let` tail expression without an `else` arm for an enum with a single variant, suggest writing an irrefutable `let` binding instead.
```
error[E0317]: `if` may be missing an `else` clause
--> $DIR/irrefutable-if-let-without-else.rs:8:5
|
LL | fn foo(x: Enum) -> i32 {
| --- expected `i32` because of this return type
LL | / if let Enum::Variant(value) = x {
LL | | value
LL | | }
| |_____^ expected `i32`, found `()`
|
= note: `if` expressions without `else` evaluate to `()`
= help: consider adding an `else` block that evaluates to the expected type
help: consider using an irrefutable `let` binding instead
|
LL ~ let Enum::Variant(value) = x;
LL ~ value
|
```
Fix#61788.
Mark "unused binding" suggestion as maybe incorrect
Ignoring unused bindings should be a determination made by a human, `rustfix` shouldn't auto-apply the suggested change.
Fix#54196.
Add FileCheck annotations to MIR-opt SROA tests
Part of #116971, adds FileCheck annotations to SROA MIR-opt tests in `tests/mir-opt/sroa` and a few uncategorized files.
r? cjgillot
Use the same mir-opt bless targets on all platforms
This undoes some of the implementation in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/119035, but not the effect. Sorry for the churn, I've learned a lot about how all this works over the past few weeks.
The objective here is to make `x test mir-opt --bless` use the same set of targets on all platforms. It didn't do that from the start because bootstrap assumes that a target linker is available, so the availability of cross-linkers is how we ended up with `MIR_OPT_BLESS_TARGET_MAPPING` and poor support for blessing mir-opt tests from Aarch64 MacOS. This PR corrects that.
So I've adjusted the bless targets for mir-opt tests, as well as tweaked some of the logic in bootstrap about linker configuration so that we don't try to access the cache of cc/linker configuration when doing the mir-opt builds.
While working on that I realized that if I swapped from the `cargo rustc -p std` strategy to `cargo check` on the sysroot, I could use the existing code for check builds to bypass some linker logic. Sweet.
But just doing that doesn't work, because then mir-opt tests complain that they can't find an rlib for any of the standard library crates. That happens because nearly all the mir-opt tests are attempting to build `CrateType::Executable`. We already have all the MIR required for mir-opt tests from the rmeta files, but since rustc think we're trying to build an executable it demands we have access to all the upstream monomorphizations that only exist in rlibs, not the meta files in a MIR-only sysroot.
So to fix that, I've swapped all the mir-opt tests be passed `--crate-type=rlib`. That works, but leaves us with a few broken mir-opt tests which I've blessed or fixed up; we also lose MIR for some functions so I added `-Clink-dead-code` to paper over that. The inlining changes are because changing the crate-type perturbs the hashes that are compared here to sometimes let us do inlining even in a possibly-recursive call: 4cb17b4e78/compiler/rustc_mir_transform/src/inline.rs (L332-L341)
