Move an ACE test out of the GCI directory
In https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/122988, a test pertaining to `associated_const_equality` was placed into the directory meant for `generic_const_items`. Let's move it where it belongs.
While at it, I took the time to further minimize the test and to add a description. You can use 1.67.1 (as reported in rust-lang/rust#108220) to verify that I didn't butcher it. For additional context, the issue was likely fixed in rust-lang/rust#112718 (but I'm also cc'ing rust-lang/rust#140467 which further fixed things up and has more context).
I only performed quick and dirty git/GitHub archeology, so I don't have the full picture here. For one, I'm not even sure if this regression test is worth it.
Anyway, I just want it gone from the GCI dir :)
Remove cache for citool
I'm not sure why, but after the citool cache is loaded, compiling just build_helper and citool takes ~30s, which is very slow. Combined with the fact that just loading the cache takes ~15s, and we have to run a hacky workflow on master, which results [in benign failures](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/actions?query=branch%3Amaster), I don't think it's worth it to use the cache here anymore.
A fresh build, now that we don't run citool tests on PR CI, takes just ~35-40s, so it's actually faster now *not* to cache. The trade-offs change quite often :)
r? ``@ghost``
Rename run always
This PR renames run_always to run_to_dry_run for better clarity, making the field's purpose more explicit and avoiding confusion with command caching behavior.
r? ``````@Kobzol``````
Port `#[export_name]` to the new attribute parsing infrastructure
This PR contains two changes, in separate commits for reviewability:
- Ports `export_name` to the new attribute parsing infrastructure for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131229#issuecomment-2971353197
- Moves the check for mixing export_name/no_mangle to check_attr.rs and improve the error message, which previously had a mix of 2021/2024 edition syntax
r? ``@jdonszelmann``
Fix RwLock::try_write documentation for WouldBlock condition
Fix RwLock::try_write documentation for WouldBlock condition
The documentation incorrectly stated that try_write only fails when
'already locked exclusively', but it actually fails when there are
either shared (read) or exclusive (write) locks.
Fixesrust-lang/rust#142852
Add note to `find_const_ty_from_env`
Add a note to `find_const_ty_from_env` to explain why it has an `unwrap` which "often" causes ICEs.
Also, uplift it into the new trait solver. This avoids needing to go through the interner to call this method which is otherwise an inherent method in the compiler. I can remove this part if desired.
r? `@boxyuwu`
Remove incorrect comments in `Weak`
It is currently possible to create a dangling `Weak` to a DST by calling `Weak::new()` for a sized type, then doing an unsized coercion. Therefore, the comments are wrong.
These comments were added in <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/73845>. As far as I can tell, the guarantee in the comment was only previously used in the `as_ptr` method. However, the current implementation of `as_ptr` no longer relies on this guarantee.
[perf] Compute hard errors without diagnostics in impl_intersection_has_impossible_obligation
First compute hard errors without diagnostics, then ambiguities with diagnostics since we need to know if any of them overflowed.
Remove some glob imports from the type system
Namely, remove the glob imports for `BoundRegionConversionTime`, `RegionVariableOrigin`, `SubregionOrigin`, `TyOrConstInferVar`, `RegionResolutionError`, `SelectionError`, `ProjectionCandidate`, `ProjectionCandidateSet`, and some more specific scoped globs (like `Inserted` in the impl overlap graph construction.
These glob imports are IMO very low value, since they're not used nearly as often as other globs (like `TyKind`).
small iter.intersperse.fold() optimization
No need to call into fold when the first item is already None, this avoids some redundant work for empty iterators.
"But it uses Fuse" one might want to protest, but Fuse is specialized and may call into the inner iterator anyway.
const-eval: allow constants to refer to mutable/external memory, but reject such constants as patterns
This fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/140653 by accepting code such as this:
```rust
static FOO: AtomicU32 = AtomicU32::new(0);
const C: &'static AtomicU32 = &FOO;
```
This can be written entirely in safe code, so there can't really be anything wrong with it.
We also accept the much more questionable following code, since it looks very similar to the interpreter:
```rust
static mut FOO2: u32 = 0;
const C2: &'static u32 = unsafe { &mut FOO2 };
```
Using this without causing UB is at least very hard (the details are unclear since it is related to how the aliasing model deals with the staging of const-eval vs runtime code).
If a constant like `C2` is used as a pattern, we emit an error:
```
error: constant BAD_PATTERN cannot be used as pattern
--> $DIR/const_refs_to_static_fail.rs:30:9
|
LL | BAD_PATTERN => {},
| ^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: constants that reference mutable or external memory cannot be used as pattern
```
(If you somehow manage to build a pattern with constant `C`, you'd get the same error, but that should be impossible: we don't have a type that can be used in patterns and that has interior mutability.)
The same treatment is afforded for shared references to `extern static`, for the same reason: the const evaluation is entirely fine with it, we just can't build a pattern for it -- and when using interior mutability, this can be totally sound.
We do still not accept anything where there is an `&mut` in the final value of the const, as that should always require unsafe code and it's hard to imagine a sound use-case that would require this.
make RefCell unstably const
Now that we can do interior mutability in `const`, most of the `RefCell` API can be `const fn`. The main exceptions are APIs which use `FnOnce` (`RefCell::replace_with` and `Ref[Mut]::[filter_]map[_split]`) and `RefCell::take` which calls `Default::default`.
Tracking issue: #137844
Add edition checks for some tests that had divergent output
In order to expose edition dependent divergences in some tests in the test suite, add explicit `edition` annotations. Some of these tests might require additional work to *avoid* the divergences, as they might have been unintentional. These are not exhaustive changes, purely opportunistic while I was looking at something else.
Enforce in bootstrap that build must have stage at least 1
This PR is a step towards https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/326414-t-infra.2Fbootstrap/topic/Proposal.20to.20cleanup.20stages.20and.20steps.20after.20the.20redesign/with/523586917. It's very hard or me to make self-contained changes to bootstrap at this moment, so this PR kind of does several things:
1) (first two commits) Try to reduce the usage of `Std::new` in bootstrap, and replace it with a `Builder::std` method (similar to `Builder::compiler`). This is mostly to remove executions of the `Std` step for stage 0, which doesn't make a lot of sense; I'd like to ideally have the invariant that when a step is invoked, it actually builds or does something. Eventually, I'd like for everything to go through `Builder::std`. (Note: I'm not totally married to this idea, if you don't like it, we can remove it from this PR. I mostly did it right now to remove stage 0 std steps from snapshot tests, which shouldn't be there, but we can also filter them out in a different way)
2) Make sure that when you pass `x build compiler`, only the `Assemble` root level step will be invoked, and not the `Rustc` step. Before, both were invoked, which actually ran `Rustc` twice, once with all `crates` filled, and once with no crates (but both actually represent the same situation). Since the `Rustc::make_run` step actually requests a compile that is one stage below it, this actually made `build compiler --stage 0` work, which we don't want to have anymore.
3) Enforce a bootstrap-global invariant that all `build` commands are always on stage `>=1`. If you try to `build` anything on stage 0, it will print a warning and exit bootstrap. This follows the intuition from the new staging rules after the stage redesign; artifacts that are "stage 0" come outside of bootstrap, and we can't really build something for which we don't have source (although we can still test it, but that's for another PR).
Now the logic for build should be quite simple. For pretty much everything except for `Std`, you first use the stage0 compiler to build stage 1. Then you can build a stage 2 <something> using the previously built stage 1 (and then you can continue to stage 3 etc.). And that's it. The default build stage for everything is 1 (modulo download-ci-rustc, but that's a separate can of worms).
The snapshot test infra isn't super nice at the moment, as one of next steps I want to create some simple Builder pattern that will allow us to configure the bootstrap invocations in a more "forward-compatible" way (e.g. now it's not possible to modify the config passed to `configure_with_args`).
There are some things not yet fully resolved for build stage 0:
1) Cargo is still a `ModeRustc` tool, even though it doesn't really have to be, it is buildable with the stage0 compiler
2) bootstrap tools (`opt-dist`, `build-manifest` etc.) are still called stage0 tools, and in the bootstrap output it says something like "stage 0 rustc builds stage 0 opt-dist". Which is a bit weird, but functionally there's no difference, it's just a slightly inconsistent output. We still haven't decided if we should make these tools ignore staging altogether (which is IMO the right choice) or if we want to allow building stage 1/2/3/... bootstrap tools.
r? `@jieyouxu`
try-job: x86_64-rust-for-linux
Turn `stdarch` into a Josh subtree
In a similar vein as https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/141229, this PR makes the `stdarch` repository a Josh subtree (it was previously a submodule). The initial commit of `stdarch` upon this is based is `5a7342fc16b208b1b16624e886937ed8509a6506`, which is the previous commit SHA of the `stdarch` submodule. The sync was performed according to https://hackmd.io/7pOuxnkdQDaL1Y1FQr65xg.
This was decided in https://github.com/rust-lang/stdarch/issues/1655.
Test pull PR on my fork: https://github.com/Kobzol/stdarch/pull/1
Test push PR on my fork: https://github.com/Kobzol/rust/pull/59
I plan to use the same Rust (miri-inspired) tooling that we use for `rustc-dev-guide` to enable pulls/pushes on stdarch.
Note that this repository currently doesn't have any stdarch-specific tests, so before that, the subtree should only be modified through this repository only when dealing with changes that contain "cyclical dependencies" between stdarch and rustc. The long term vision is to integrate stdarch into rust-lang/rust completely.
CC `@Amanieu`
try-job: aarch64-apple
try-job: aarch64-gnu
try-job: `x86_64-msvc-*`
try-job: x86_64-gnu
try-job: x86_64-gnu-aux
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#142146 (Withdraw the claim `extern "C-cmse-nonsecure-*"` always matches `extern "C"`)
- rust-lang/rust#142200 (`tests/ui`: A New Order [8/N])
- rust-lang/rust#142724 (Add runtime check to avoid overwrite arg in `Diag`)
- rust-lang/rust#142809 (Add PrintTAFn flag for targeted type analysis printing)
- rust-lang/rust#142976 (Check CoerceUnsized impl validity before coercing)
- rust-lang/rust#142992 (Convert some ABI tests to use `extern "rust-invalid"`)
- rust-lang/rust#143000 (Make `Sub`, `Mul`, `Div` and `Rem` `const_traits`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Add PrintTAFn flag for targeted type analysis printing
## Summary
This PR adds a new `PrintTAFn` flag to the `-Z autodiff` option that allows printing type analysis information for a specific function, rather than all functions.
## Changes
### New Flag
- Added `PrintTAFn=<function_name>` option to `-Z autodiff`
- Usage: `-Z autodiff=Enable,PrintTAFn=my_function_name`
### Implementation Details
- **Rust side**: Added `PrintTAFn(String)` variant to `AutoDiff` enum
- **Parser**: Updated `parse_autodiff` to handle `PrintTAFn=<function_name>` syntax with proper error handling
- **FFI**: Added `set_print_type_fun` function to interface with Enzyme's `FunctionToAnalyze` command line option
- **Documentation**: Updated help text and documentation for the new flag
### Files Modified
- `compiler/rustc_session/src/config.rs`: Added `PrintTAFn(String)` variant
- `compiler/rustc_session/src/options.rs`: Updated parser and help text (now shows `PrintTAFn` in the list)
- `compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/llvm/enzyme_ffi.rs`: Added FFI function and static variable
- `compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/back/lto.rs`: Added handling for new flag
- `src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/autodiff/flags.md`: Updated documentation
- `src/doc/unstable-book/src/compiler-flags/autodiff.md`: Updated documentation
## Testing
The flag can be tested with:
```bash
rustc +enzyme -Z autodiff=Enable,PrintTAFn=square test.rs
```
This will print type analysis information only for the function named "square" instead of all functions.
## Error Handling
The parser includes proper error handling:
- Missing argument: `PrintTAFn` without `=<function_name>` will show an error
- Unknown options: Invalid autodiff options will be reported
r? ```@ZuseZ4```
Add runtime check to avoid overwrite arg in `Diag`
## Origin PR description
At first, I set up a `debug_assert` check for the arg method to make sure that `args` in `Diag` aren't easily overwritten, and I added the `remove_arg()` method, so that if you do need to overwrite an arg, then you can explicitly call `remove_arg()` to remove it first, then call `arg()` to overwrite it.
For the code before the rust-lang/rust#142015 change, it won't compile because it will report an error
```
arg `instance`already exists.
```
This PR also modifies all diagnostics that fail the check to pass the check. There are two cases of check failure:
1. ~~Between *the parent diagnostic and the subdiagnostic*, or *between the subdiagnostics* have the same field between them. In this case, I renamed the conflicting fields.~~
2. ~~For subdiagnostics stored in `Vec`, the rendering may iteratively write the same arg over and over again. In this case, I changed the auto-generation with `derive(SubDiagnostic)` to manually implementing `SubDiagnostic` and manually rendered it with `eagerly_translate()`, similar to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/142031#issuecomment-2984812090, and after rendering it I manually deleted useless arg with the newly added `remove_arg` method.~~
## Final Decision
After trying and discussing, we made a final decision.
For `#[derive(Subdiagnostic)]`, This PR made two changes:
1. After the subdiagnostic is rendered, remove all args of this subdiagnostic, which allows for usage like `Vec<Subdiag>`.
2. Store `diag.args` before setting arguments, so that you can restore the contents of the main diagnostic after deleting the arguments after subdiagnostic is rendered, to avoid deleting the main diagnostic's arg when they have the same name args.
Withdraw the claim `extern "C-cmse-nonsecure-*"` always matches `extern "C"`
We currently claim that `extern "C-cmse-nonsecure-*"` ABIs will always match `extern "C"`, but that seems... **optimistic** when one considers that `extern "C"` is ambiguous enough to be redefined in ways we may not want the Cortex M Security Extensions ABIs to mirror. If some configuration, feature, or other platform quirk that applied to Arm CPUs with CMSE would modify the `extern "C"` ABI, it does not seem like we should guarantee that also applies to the `extern "cmse-nonsecure-*"` ABIs. Anything involving target modifiers that might affect register availability or usage could make us liars if, for instance, clang decides those apply to normal C functions but not ones with the CMSE attributes, but we still want to have interop with the C compiler.
We simply do not control enough of the factors involved to both force these ABIs to match and still provide useful interop, so we shouldn't implicitly promise they do. We should leave this judgement call to the decisions of platform experts who can afford to keep up with the latest news from Cambridge, instead of enshrining today's hopeful guess forever in Rust's permitted ABIs.
It's a bit weird anyways.
- The attributes are `__attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_call))` and `__attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry))`, so the obvious choice is `extern "cmse-nonsecure-call"` and `extern "cmse-nonsecure-entry"`.
- We do not prefix any other ABI that reflects (or even *is*) a C ABI with "C-", with the exception of the Rust-defined `extern "C-unwind`", e.g. we do not have `extern "C-aapcs"` or `extern "C-sysv64"`.
Tracking issues:
- rust-lang/rust#75835
- rust-lang/rust#81391
Remove dead instructions in terminate blocks
Terminate blocks look pretty in the IR I've looked at, so no actual perf delta from this. But it seems reasonable to note produce unused IR.
In order to expose edition dependent divergences in some tests in the test suite, add explicit `edition` annotations. Some of these tests might require additional work to *avoid* the divergences, as they might have been unintentional. These are not exhaustive changes, purely opportunistic while looking at something else.
