Querify unused trait check.
This code transitively loads information for all bodies, and from resolutions. As it does not return a value, it should be beneficial to have it as a query.
Don't translate compiler-internal bug messages
These are not very useful to be translated, as
* translators would get really weird and bad english versions to start out from,
* compiler devs have to do some work for what is supposed to be dead code and just a sanity check,
* the target audience is other compiler devs.
r? `@davidtwco`
Make it clearer that edition functions are `>=`, not `==`
r? `@Nilstrieb`
We could also perhaps derive `Ord` on `Edition` and use comparison operators.
Add the `no-builtins` attribute to functions when `no_builtins` is applied at the crate level.
**When `no_builtins` is applied at the crate level, we should add the `no-builtins` attribute to each function to ensure it takes effect in LTO.**
This is also the reason why no_builtins does not take effect in LTO as mentioned in #35540.
Now, `#![no_builtins]` should be similar to `-fno-builtin` in clang/gcc, see https://clang.godbolt.org/z/z4j6Wsod5.
Next, we should make `#![no_builtins]` participate in LTO again. That makes sense, as LTO also takes into consideration function-level instruction optimizations, such as the MachineOutliner. More importantly, when a user writes a large `#![no_builtins]` crate, they would like this crate to participate in LTO as well.
We should also add a function-level no_builtins attribute to allow users to have more control over it. This is similar to Clang's `__attribute__((no_builtin))` feature, see https://clang.godbolt.org/z/Wod6KK6eq. Before implementing this feature, maybe we should discuss whether to support more fine-grained control, such as `__attribute__((no_builtin("memcpy")))`.
Related discussions:
- #109821
- #35540
Next (a separate pull request?):
- [ ] Revert #35637
- [ ] Add a function-level `no_builtin` attribute?
Safe Transmute: Fix ICE (due to UnevaluatedConst)
This patch updates the code that looks at the `Assume` type when evaluating if transmutation is possible. An ICE was being triggered in the case that the `Assume` parameter contained an unevaluated const (in this test case, due to a function with missing parameter names).
Fixes#110892
This patch updates the code that looks at the `Assume` type when evaluating if
transmutation is possible. An ICE was being triggered in the case that the
`Assume` parameter contained an unevaluated const (in this test case, due to a
function with missing parameter names).
Fixes#110892
Use u64 for incr comp allocation offsets
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76037
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/95780
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/111613
These issues are all reporting ICEs caused by using `u32` to store offsets to allocations in the incremental compilation cache. This PR aims to lift that limitation by changing the offset type in question to `u64`.
There are two perf runs in this PR. The first reports a regression, and the second does not. The changes are the same in both. I rebased the PR then did the second perf run because I noticed that the primary regression in it was very commonly seen in spurious regression reports.
I do not know what the perf run will report when this is merged. I would not be surprised to see regression or neutral, but the cachegrind diffs for the regression point at `try_mark_previous_green` which is a common source of inexplicable regressions and I don't think should be perturbed by this PR.
I'm not opposed to adding a regression test such as
```rust
fn main() {
println!("{}", [37; 1 << 30].len());
}
```
But that program takes 1 minute to compile and consumes 4.6 GB of memory then writes that much to disk. Is that a concerning amount of resource use for a test?
r? `@nnethercote`
Streamline size estimates (take 2)
This was merged in #113684 but then [something happened](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113684#issuecomment-1636811985):
> There has been a bors issue that lead to the merge commit of this PR getting purged from master.
> You'll have to make a new PR to reapply it.
So this is exactly the same changes.
`@bors` r=wesleywiser
Add support for inherent projections in new solver
Not hard to support these, and it cuts out a really big chunk of failing UI tests with `--compare-mode=next-solver`
r? `@lcnr` (feel free to reassign, anyone can review this)
This means we call `MonoItem::size_estimate` (which involves a query)
less often: just once per mono item, and then once more per inline item
placement. After that we can reuse the stored value as necessary. This
means `CodegenUnit::compute_size_estimate` is cheaper.
Resurrect: rustc_target: Add alignment to indirectly-passed by-value types, correcting the alignment of byval on x86 in the process.
Same as #111551, which I [accidentally closed](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/111551#issuecomment-1571222612) :/
---
This resurrects PR #103830, which has sat idle for a while.
Beyond #103830, this also:
- fixes byval alignment for types containing vectors on Darwin (see `tests/codegen/align-byval-vector.rs`)
- fixes byval alignment for overaligned types on x86 Windows (see `tests/codegen/align-byval.rs`)
- fixes ABI for types with 128bit requested alignment on ARM64 Linux (see `tests/codegen/aarch64-struct-align-128.rs`)
r? `@nikic`
---
`@pcwalton's` original PR description is reproduced below:
Commit 88e4d2c from five years ago removed
support for alignment on indirectly-passed arguments because of problems with
the `i686-pc-windows-msvc` target. Unfortunately, the `memcpy` optimizations I
recently added to LLVM 16 depend on this to forward `memcpy`s. This commit
attempts to fix the problems with `byval` parameters on that target and now
correctly adds the `align` attribute.
The problem is summarized in [this comment] by `@eddyb.` Briefly, 32-bit x86 has
special alignment rules for `byval` parameters: for the most part, their
alignment is forced to 4. This is not well-documented anywhere but in the Clang
source. I looked at the logic in Clang `TargetInfo.cpp` and tried to replicate
it here. The relevant methods in that file are
`X86_32ABIInfo::getIndirectResult()` and
`X86_32ABIInfo::getTypeStackAlignInBytes()`. The `align` parameter attribute
for `byval` parameters in LLVM must match the platform ABI, or miscompilations
will occur. Note that this doesn't use the approach suggested by eddyb, because
I felt it was overkill to store the alignment in `on_stack` when special
handling is really only needed for 32-bit x86.
As a side effect, this should fix#80127, because it will make the `align`
parameter attribute for `byval` parameters match the platform ABI on LLVM
x86-64.
[this comment]: #80822 (comment)
Make it clearer that we're just checking for an RPITIT
Tiny nit to use `is_impl_trait_in_trait` more, to make it clearer that we're just checking whether a def-id is an RPITIT, rather than doing something meaningful with the `opt_rpitit_info`.
r? `@spastorino`
Use maybe_body_owned_by for multiple suggestions
This is a continued work from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113567
We have several other suggestions not working for closure, this PR use `maybe_body_owned_by` to fix them and add test cases for them.
Add a cache for `maybe_lint_level_root_bounded`
`maybe_lint_level_root_bounded` is called many times and traces node sub-paths many times. This PR adds a cache that lets many of these tracings be skipped, avoiding lots of calls to functions like `Map::attrs` and `Map::parent_id`.
r? `@cjgillot`
refactor proof tree formatting
mostly:
- handle indentation via a separate formatter
- change nested to use a closure
tested it after rebasing on top of #113536 and everything looks good.
r? `````@BoxyUwU`````
