This is error-prone. Explicitly write down which cases don't need
anything substituted. Turn the `OpaqueType` case, which currently
seems to be unreachable, into a `bug!`.
Rollup of 12 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #135767 (Future incompatibility warning `unsupported_fn_ptr_calling_conventions`: Also warn in dependencies)
- #137852 (Remove layouting dead code for non-array SIMD types.)
- #137863 (Fix pretty printing of unsafe binders)
- #137882 (do not build additional stage on compiler paths)
- #137894 (Revert "store ScalarPair via memset when one side is undef and the other side can be memset")
- #137902 (Make `ast::TokenKind` more like `lexer::TokenKind`)
- #137921 (Subtree update of `rust-analyzer`)
- #137922 (A few cleanups after the removal of `cfg(not(parallel))`)
- #137939 (fix order on shl impl)
- #137946 (Fix docker run-local docs)
- #137955 (Always allow rustdoc-json tests to contain long lines)
- #137958 (triagebot.toml: Don't label `test/rustdoc-json` as A-rustdoc-search)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
A few cleanups after the removal of `cfg(not(parallel))`
I noticed a few small things that are no longer needed after the removal of `cfg(not(parallel))` in #132282.
One of the later changes adjusts several imports, so viewing the changes individually is recommended.
r? SparrowLii (or reroll)
Fix pretty printing of unsafe binders
We used to render `unsafe<> i32` as `i32`, and `unsafe<'a> &'a i32` as `for<'a> &'a i32`.
r? oli-obk
Review with whitespace b/c adding a new argument changes some the wrapping of some function calls.
When encountering a resolve E0575 error for an associated method (when a type was expected), see if it could have been an intended return type notation bound.
```
error[E0575]: expected associated type, found associated function `Trait::method`
--> $DIR/bad-inputs-and-output.rs:31:36
|
LL | fn foo_qualified<T: Trait>() where <T as Trait>::method(i32): Send {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ not a associated type
|
help: you might have meant to use the return type notation syntax
|
LL - fn foo_qualified<T: Trait>() where <T as Trait>::method(i32): Send {}
LL + fn foo_qualified<T: Trait>() where T::method(..): Send {}
|
```
ensure we always print all --print options in help
Closes#137853
Refactors the PRINT_KINDS map into a public const so we always print every option for print. the list is quite long now, and idk if long term we want to keep printing all these options from --help.
Stop using `hash_raw_entry` in `CodegenCx::const_str`
That unstable feature (#56167) completed fcp-close, so the compiler needs to be
migrated away to allow its removal. In this case, `cg_llvm` and `cg_gcc`
were using raw entries to optimize their `const_str_cache` lookup and
insertion. We can change that to separate `get` and (on miss) `insert`
calls, so we still have the fast path avoiding string allocation when
the cache hits.
Implement `#[cfg]` in `where` clauses
This PR implements #115590, which supports `#[cfg]` attributes in `where` clauses.
The biggest change is, that it adds `AttrsVec` and `NodeId` to the `ast::WherePredicate` and `HirId` to the `hir::WherePredicate`.
This was left to only warn in the current crate to give users
a chance to update their code. Now for 1.86 we also warn users
depending on those crates.
rustdoc: when merging target features, keep the highest stability
This addresses https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/137366. (Not closing since we might consider a backport.)
rustdoc wants to pretend that it runs for all targets at once and has all target features, so `tcx.rust_target_features()` will actually be all the target features. For target features that exist on multiple targets, the stability info for one of the targets will be picked (first or last in the list, I guess). All the code consuming that query has to be aware that the data is basically nonsense when running in rustdoc, but the logic checking for unstable or forbidden `#[target_feature]` attributes was not aware of that.
This PR makes the `tcx.rust_target_features()` info in rustdoc slightly less nonsensical (and decidedly less random) by having the "most stable" target feature take precedent. That deals with #137366 (a conflict between a stable and a "forbidden" target feature of the same name for different targets), and also deals with the situation (that we did not seem to have yet) of a conflict between a stable and an unstable target feature of the same name. Note that if there are two unstable target features of the same name, rustdoc might still require the "wrong" nightly feature to be enabled -- but this can only possibly affect unstable code so I guess we can wait until that actually happens, and then someone will have to rewrite this entire thing to be less hacky.
