Fix codegen of uninhabited PassMode::Indirect return types.
Add codegen test for uninhabited PassMode::Indirect return types.
Enable optimizations for uninhabited return type codegen test
This updates the Fuchsia target spec with the [Clang Fuchsia driver],
which picks up a few changes:
* Adds `-z start-stop-visibility=hidden` and `-z rel` to the pre link
arguments.
* Adds `--execute-only` and `--fix-cortex-a53-843419` for
`aarch64-unknown-fuchsia`.
* Enables the cpu features equivalent to x86-64-v2 for
`x86_64-unknown-fuchsia`, which is our minimum supported x86_64.
platform according to [RFC-0073].
* Enables the cpu features `+crc,+aes,+sha2,+neon` on aarch64.
* Increases the max atomic width on 86_64 to 128.
* Enables stack probes and xray on aarch64 and riscv64.
[Clang Fuchsia driver]: 8374d42186/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Fuchsia.cpp
[RFC-0073]: https://fuchsia.dev/fuchsia-src/contribute/governance/rfcs/0073_x86_64_platform_requirement
When a `?` operation requires an `Into` conversion with additional bounds (like having a concrete error but wanting to convert to a trait object), we handle it speficically and provide the same kind of information we give other `?` related errors.
```
error[E0277]: `?` couldn't convert the error: `E: std::error::Error` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/bad-question-mark-on-trait-object.rs:5:13
|
LL | fn foo() -> Result<(), Box<dyn std::error::Error>> {
| -------------------------------------- required `E: std::error::Error` because of this
LL | Ok(bar()?)
| ^ the trait `std::error::Error` is not implemented for `E`
|
= note: the question mark operation (`?`) implicitly performs a conversion on the error value using the `From` trait
= note: required for `Box<dyn std::error::Error>` to implement `From<E>`
```
Avoid talking about `FromResidual` when other more relevant information is being given, particularly from `rust_on_unimplemented`.
While it would technically be possible to workaround this in cg_clif, it
quickly becomes very messy and would likely cause correctness issues.
Working around it in rustc instead is much simper and won't have any
negative impact for code running on stable as vectors smaller than
128bit can only be made on nightly using core::simd or #[repr(simd)].
Don't store a redundant span in user-type projections
While experimenting with some larger changes, I noticed that storing this span here is unnecessary, because it is also present in the corresponding `CanonicalUserTypeAnnotation` and can be retrieved via the annotation's ID.
Emit `trunc nuw` for unchecked shifts and `to_immediate_scalar`
- For shifts this shrinks the IR by no longer needing an `assume` while still providing the UB information
- Having this on the `i8`→`i1` truncations will hopefully help with some places that have to load `i8`s or pass those in LLVM structs without range information
I had to do a lot of debug by printing; having these `Debug` traits in
place made it easier. Additionally, add some more information to
existing `info!` statements.
Introduce an enum that represents the different possible sources for
dependencies, and use them where possible. This will enable more fine
grained control and provides better context than passing the `dep_root`
tuple.
Use this to ensure that injected crates always show up as private by
default.
`Postorder` has a `C: Customization<'tcx>` parameter, that gives it
flexibility about how it computes successors. But in practice, there are
only two `impls` of `Customization`, and one is for the unit type.
This commit simplifies things by removing the generic parameter and
replacing it with an `Option`.
Tweak "expected ident" parse error to avoid talking about doc comments
When encountering a doc comment without an identifier after, we'd unconditionally state "this doc comment doesn't document anything", swallowing the *actual* error which is that the thing *after* the doc comment wasn't expected. Added a check that the found token is something that "conceptually" closes the previous item before emitting that error, otherwise just complain about the missing identifier.
In both of the following cases, the syntax error follows a doc comment:
```
error: expected identifier, found keyword `Self`
--> $DIR/doc-before-bad-variant.rs:4:5
|
LL | enum TestEnum {
| -------- while parsing this enum
...
LL | Self,
| ^^^^ expected identifier, found keyword
|
= help: enum variants can be `Variant`, `Variant = <integer>`, `Variant(Type, ..., TypeN)` or `Variant { fields: Types }`
```
```
error: expected identifier, found `<`
--> $DIR/doc-before-syntax-error.rs:2:1
|
LL | <>
| ^ expected identifier
```
Fix#71982.
Pattern Migration 2024: properly label `&` patterns whose subpatterns are from macro expansions
See the failing test output in the first commit for an example of what this going wrong looks like. The error/lint diagnostic tries to point to just the `&` or `&mut` of reference patterns when labeling the causes, to make the output clearer (#134394). The trimming there wasn't quite right though: it used the interior of the reference pattern as a cutoff and extended backwards to find where to trim the pattern's span, but this breaks if the `&` and the interior are from different sources. This PR instead trims by starting at the start of the pattern and ending at the final character of the `&` (or `&mut`, `ref`, `ref mut`, or `mut`, depending on what the error/lint is labeling); that way, there's no opportunity for failure from mixing sources.
I'm not 100% happy with this approach, but I'm also not sure what the best practices are as far as hacky `SourceMap` munching goes, so please let me know if something else would be preferred.
Since `SourceMap::span_through_char` can't change the syntax context of the span, I've also removed a call to `Span::with_ctxt` (we care about the edition of the span in question since this is a hard error in Rust 2024). If we want to be extra safe in case that changes, I can re-add it or track error hardness separately in the `rust_2024_migration_desugared_pats` table.
Register `USAGE_OF_TYPE_IR_INHERENT`, remove inherent usages
I implemented a lint to discourage the usage of `rustc_type_ir::inherent` but never actually enabled it. People started using `rustc_type_ir::inherent` methods through globs, lol.
r? fmease or reassign as you please
Make fewer crates depend on `rustc_ast_ir`
I think it simplifies the crate graph and also exposes people less to confusion if downstream crates don't interact with `rustc_ast_ir` directly and instead just use its functionality reexported through more familiar paths.
r? oli-obk since you introduced ast-ir
Restrict `bevy_ecs` `ParamSet` hack
This limits the bevy WF hack to only apply to ADTs named `ParamSet` that come from crates named `bevy_ecs`, and references to the latter.
Previously, we were applying it to all ADTs that contained the substring `"ParamSet"`. This could show up anywhere in the ADT name, and it could come from any crate. It's a bit concerning since other code could theoretically begin to rely on this behavior too (though I don't expect it to)
This simplifies the logic a bit and turns it into a visitor.
r? `@jackh726`
interpret: adjust vtable validity check for higher-ranked types
## What
Transmuting between trait objects where a generic argument or associated type only differs in bound regions (not bound at or above the trait object's binder) is now UB. For example
* transmuting between `&dyn Trait<for<'a> fn(&'a u8)>` and `&dyn Trait<fn(&'static u8)>` is UB.
* transmuting between `&dyn Trait<Assoc = for<'a> fn(&'a u8)>` and `&dyn Trait<Assoc = fn(&'static u8)>` is UB.
* transmuting between `&dyn Trait<for<'a> fn(&'a u8) -> (&'a u8, &'static u8)>` and `&dyn Trait<for<'a> fn(&'a u8) -> (&'static u8, &'a u8)>` is UB.
Transmuting between subtypes (in either direction) is still allowed, which means that bound regions that are bound at or above the trait object's binder can still be changed:
* transmuting between `&dyn for<'a> Trait<fn(&'a u8)>` and `&dyn for Trait<fn(&'static u8)>` is fine.
* transmuting between `&dyn for<'a> Trait<dyn Trait<fn(&'a u8)>>` and `&dyn for Trait<dyn Trait<fn(&'static u8)>>` is fine.
## Why
Very similar to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120217 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120222, changing a trait object's generic argument to a type that only differs in bound regions can still affect the vtable layout and lead to segfaults at runtime (for an example see `src/tools/miri/tests/fail/validity/dyn-transmute-inner-binder.rs`).
Since we already already require that the trait object predicates must be equal modulo bound regions, it is only natural to extend this check to also require type equality considering bound regions.
However, it also makes sense to allow transmutes between a type and a subtype thereof. For example `&dyn for<'a> Trait<&'a u8>` is a subtype of `&dyn Trait<&'static ()>` and they are guaranteed to have the same vtable, so it makes sense to allow this transmute. So that's why bound lifetimes that are bound to the trait object itself are treated as free lifetime for the purpose of this check.
Note that codegen already relies on the property that subtyping cannot change the the vtable and this is asserted here (note the leak check): 251206c27b/compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/base.rs (L106-L153)
Furthermore, we allow some pointer-to-pointer casts like `*const dyn for<'a> Trait<&'a u8>` to `*const Wrapper<dyn Trait<&'static u8>>` that instantiate the trait object binder and are currently lowered to a single pointer-to-pointer cast in MIR (`CastKind::PtrToPtr`) and *not* an unsizing coercion (`CastKind::PointerCoercion(Unsize)`), so the current MIR lowering of these would be UB if we didn't allow subtyping transmutes.
---
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/135230
cc `@rust-lang/opsem`
r? `@compiler-errors` for the implementation
The only visible change is to the filenames produce by `-Zdump-mir`.
E.g. before and after:
```
h.main.003-000.analysis-post-cleanup.after.mir
h.main.2-2-000.analysis-post-cleanup.after.mir
```
It also fixes a FIXME comment.
Lint `#[must_use]` attributes applied to methods in trait impls
The `#[must_use]` attribute has no effect when applied to methods in trait implementations. This PR adds it to the unused `#[must_use]` lint, and cleans the extra attributes in portable-simd and Clippy.
Suggest replacing `.` with `::` in more error diagnostics.
First commit makes the existing "help: use the path separator to refer to an item" also work when the base is a type alias, not just a trait/module/struct.
The existing unconditional `DefKind::Mod | DefKind::Trait` match arm is changed to a conditional `DefKind::Mod | DefKind::Trait | DefKind::TyAlias` arm that only matches if the `path_sep` suggestion-adding closure succeeds, so as not to stop the later `DefKind::TyAlias`-specific suggestions if the path-sep suggestion does not apply. This shouldn't change behavior for `Mod` or `Trait` (due to the default arm's `return false` etc).
This commit also updates `tests/ui/resolve/issue-22692.rs` to reflect this, and also renames it to something more meaningful.
This commit also makes the `bad_struct_syntax_suggestion` closure take `err` as a parameter instead of capturing it, since otherwise caused borrowing errors due to the change to using `path_sep` in a pattern guard.
<details> <summary> Type alias diagnostic example </summary>
```rust
type S = String;
fn main() {
let _ = S.new;
}
```
```diff
error[E0423]: expected value, found type alias `S`
--> diag7.rs:4:13
|
4 | let _ = S.new;
| ^
|
- = note: can't use a type alias as a constructor
+ help: use the path separator to refer to an item
+ |
+4 | let _ = S::new;
+ | ~~
```
</details>
Second commit adds some cases for `enum`s, where if there is a field/method expression where the field/method has the name of a unit/tuple variant, we assume the user intended to create that variant[^1] and suggest replacing the `.` from the field/method suggestion with a `::` path separator. If no such variant is found (or if the error is not a field/method expression), we give the existing suggestion that suggests adding `::TupleVariant(/* fields */)` after the enum.
<details> <summary> Enum diagnostic example </summary>
```rust
enum Foo {
A(u32),
B,
C { x: u32 },
}
fn main() {
let _ = Foo.A(42); // changed
let _ = Foo.B; // changed
let _ = Foo.D(42); // no change
let _ = Foo.D; // no change
let _ = Foo(42); // no change
}
```
```diff
error[E0423]: expected value, found enum `Foo`
--> diag8.rs:8:13
|
8 | let _ = Foo.A(42); // changed
| ^^^
|
note: the enum is defined here
--> diag8.rs:1:1
|
1 | / enum Foo {
2 | | A(u32),
3 | | B,
4 | | C { x: u32 },
5 | | }
| |_^
-help: you might have meant to use the following enum variant
- |
-8 | let _ = Foo::B.A(42); // changed
- | ~~~~~~
-help: alternatively, the following enum variant is available
+help: use the path separator to refer to a variant
|
-8 | let _ = (Foo::A(/* fields */)).A(42); // changed
- | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+8 | let _ = Foo::A(42); // changed
+ | ~~
error[E0423]: expected value, found enum `Foo`
--> diag8.rs:9:13
|
9 | let _ = Foo.B; // changed
| ^^^
|
note: the enum is defined here
--> diag8.rs:1:1
|
1 | / enum Foo {
2 | | A(u32),
3 | | B,
4 | | C { x: u32 },
5 | | }
| |_^
-help: you might have meant to use the following enum variant
- |
-9 | let _ = Foo::B.B; // changed
- | ~~~~~~
-help: alternatively, the following enum variant is available
+help: use the path separator to refer to a variant
|
-9 | let _ = (Foo::A(/* fields */)).B; // changed
- | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+9 | let _ = Foo::B; // changed
+ | ~~
error[E0423]: expected value, found enum `Foo`
--> diag8.rs:10:13
|
10 | let _ = Foo.D(42); // no change
| ^^^
|
note: the enum is defined here
--> diag8.rs:1:1
|
1 | / enum Foo {
2 | | A(u32),
3 | | B,
4 | | C { x: u32 },
5 | | }
| |_^
help: you might have meant to use the following enum variant
|
10 | let _ = Foo::B.D(42); // no change
| ~~~~~~
help: alternatively, the following enum variant is available
|
10 | let _ = (Foo::A(/* fields */)).D(42); // no change
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
error[E0423]: expected value, found enum `Foo`
--> diag8.rs:11:13
|
11 | let _ = Foo.D; // no change
| ^^^
|
note: the enum is defined here
--> diag8.rs:1:1
|
1 | / enum Foo {
2 | | A(u32),
3 | | B,
4 | | C { x: u32 },
5 | | }
| |_^
help: you might have meant to use the following enum variant
|
11 | let _ = Foo::B.D; // no change
| ~~~~~~
help: alternatively, the following enum variant is available
|
11 | let _ = (Foo::A(/* fields */)).D; // no change
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
error[E0423]: expected function, tuple struct or tuple variant, found enum `Foo`
--> diag8.rs:12:13
|
12 | let _ = Foo(42); // no change
| ^^^ help: try to construct one of the enum's variants: `Foo::A`
|
= help: you might have meant to construct the enum's non-tuple variant
note: the enum is defined here
--> diag8.rs:1:1
|
1 | / enum Foo {
2 | | A(u32),
3 | | B,
4 | | C { x: u32 },
5 | | }
| |_^
error: aborting due to 5 previous errors
```
</details>
[^1]: or if it's a field expression and a tuple variant, that they meant to refer the variant constructor.
