std: directly use pthread in UNIX parker implementation
`Mutex` and `Condvar` are being replaced by more efficient implementations, which need thread parking themselves (see #93740). Therefore we should use the `pthread` synchronization primitives directly. Also, we can avoid allocating the mutex and condition variable because the `Parker` struct is being placed in an `Arc` anyways.
This basically is just a copy of the current `Mutex` and `Condvar` code, which will however be removed (again, see #93740). An alternative implementation could be to use dedicated private `OsMutex` and `OsCondvar` types, but all the other platforms supported by std actually have their own thread parking primitives.
I used `Pin` to guarantee a stable address for the `Parker` struct, while the current implementation does not, rather using extra unsafe declaration. Since the thread struct is shared anyways, I assumed this would not add too much clutter while being clearer.
Mutex and Condvar are being replaced by more efficient implementations, which need thread parking themselves (see #93740). Therefore use the pthread synchronization primitives directly. Also, avoid allocating because the Parker struct is being placed in an Arc anyways.
[fuchsia] Add implementation for `current_exe`
This implementation returns a best attempt at the current exe path. On
fuchsia, fdio will always use `argv[0]` as the process name and if it is
not set then an error will be returned. Because this is not guaranteed
to be the case, this implementation returns an error if `argv` does not
contain any elements.
remove_dir_all_recursive: treat ELOOP the same as ENOTDIR
On older Linux kernels (I tested on 4.4, corresponding to Ubuntu 16.04), opening a symlink using `O_DIRECTORY | O_NOFOLLOW` returns `ELOOP` instead of `ENOTDIR`. We should handle it the same, since a symlink is still not a directory and needs to be `unlink`ed.
This implementation returns a best attempt at the current exe path. On
fuchsia, fdio will always use `argv[0]` as the process name and if it is
not set then an error will be returned. Because this is not guaranteed
to be the case, this implementation returns an error if `argv` does not
contain any elements.
Use a single ReentrantMutex implementation on all platforms.
This replaces all platform specific ReentrantMutex implementations by the one I added in #95727 for Linux, since that one does not depend on any platform specific details.
r? `@Amanieu`
fix error handling for pthread_sigmask(3)
Errors from `pthread_sigmask(3)` were handled using `cvt()`, which expects a return value of `-1` on error and uses `errno`.
However, `pthread_sigmask(3)` returns `0` on success and an error number otherwise.
Fix it by replacing `cvt()` with `cvt_nz()`.
Use u32 instead of i32 for futexes.
This changes futexes from i32 to u32. The [Linux man page](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/futex.2.html) uses `uint32_t` for them, so I'm not sure why I used i32 for them. Maybe because I first used them for thread parkers, where I used -1, 0, and 1 as the states.
(Wasm's `memory.atomic.wait32` does use `i32`, because wasm doesn't support `u32`.)
It doesn't matter much, but using the unsigned type probably results in fewer surprises when shifting bits around or using comparison operators.
r? ```@Amanieu```
Update libc to 0.2.121
With the updated libc, UNIX stack overflow handling in libstd can now
use the common `si_addr` accessor function, rather than attempting to
use a field from that name in `siginfo_t`. This simplifies the
collection of the fault address, particularly on platforms where that
data resides within a union in `siginfo_t`.
Don't cast thread name to an integer for prctl
`libc::prctl` and the `prctl` definitions in glibc, musl, and the kernel headers are C variadic functions. Therefore, all the arguments (except for the first) are untyped. It is only the Linux man page which says that `prctl` takes 4 `unsigned long` arguments. I have no idea why it says this.
In any case, the upshot is that we don't need to cast the pointer to an integer and confuse Miri.
But in light of this... what are we doing with those three `0`s? We're passing 3 `i32`s to `prctl`, which doesn't fill me with confidence. The man page says `unsigned long` and all the constants in the linux kernel are macros for expressions of the form `1UL << N`. I'm mostly commenting on this because looks a whole lot like some UB that was found in SQLite a few years ago: <https://youtu.be/LbzbHWdLAI0?t=1925> that was related to accidentally passing a 32-bit value from a literal `0` instead of a pointer-sized value. This happens to work on x86 due to the size of pointers and happens to work on x86_64 due to the calling convention. But also, there is no good reason for an implementation to be looking at those arguments. Some other calls to `prctl` require that other arguments be zeroed, but not `PR_SET_NAME`... so why are we even passing them?
I would prefer to end such questions by either passing 3 `libc::c_ulong`, or not passing those at all, but I'm not sure which is better.
