Commit Graph

30 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
lcnr
4a0c7cc730 fix cycle head usages tracking 2025-09-26 15:29:01 +02:00
Esteban Küber
049c32797b On E0277, point at type that doesn't implement bound
When encountering an unmet trait bound, point at local type that doesn't implement the trait:

```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `Bar<T>: Foo` is not satisfied
  --> $DIR/issue-64855.rs:9:19
   |
LL | pub struct Bar<T>(<Self as Foo>::Type) where Self: ;
   |                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ unsatisfied trait bound
   |
help: the trait `Foo` is not implemented for `Bar<T>`
  --> $DIR/issue-64855.rs:9:1
   |
LL | pub struct Bar<T>(<Self as Foo>::Type) where Self: ;
   | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
2025-08-22 17:55:15 +00:00
lcnr
aa3691ea08 add regression test 2025-08-14 15:32:50 +02:00
lcnr
a78f92be9b add tests 2025-07-31 15:39:55 +02:00
Michael Goulet
1e96d7a553 Consider param-env for fast path 2025-07-20 17:45:01 +00:00
David Wood
1fd13fddba tests: add #![rustc_no_implicit_bounds]
After reviewing all tests with `?Sized` and discussing with lcnr, these
tests seem like they could probably benefit from
`#![rustc_no_implicit_bounds]`.
2025-06-27 05:34:08 +00:00
David Wood
183458263b tests: bless remaining tests
These tests just need blessing, they don't have any interesting behaviour
changes.

Some of these tests have new errors because `LegacyReceiver` cannot be
proven to be implemented now that it is also testing for `MetaSized` -
but this is just a consequence of the other errors in the test.
2025-06-16 23:04:35 +00:00
lcnr
48e119ef5a stepping into impls for norm is unproductive 2025-04-16 10:35:09 +02:00
lcnr
2c2c9df653 drop global where-bounds before merging candidates 2025-04-14 12:59:22 +02:00
lcnr
18809a2b12 keep inductive cycles as ambig in coherence 2025-03-05 10:06:43 +01:00
lcnr
01795b14f0 change definitely non-productive cycles to error 2025-03-05 10:06:43 +01:00
lcnr
6a3b30fdf4 add test using only trait bounds 2025-02-28 12:16:48 +01:00
lcnr
ef771b8450 review 2025-02-28 12:16:48 +01:00
lcnr
fe874cd99b add test for newly supported behavior 2025-02-28 12:16:47 +01:00
lcnr
7eb677e7eb normalizing where-clauses is also coinductive, add tests 2025-02-28 12:16:47 +01:00
lcnr
a7970c0b27 remove useless tests
they don't detect any bugs in the search graph. We instead check
for these via `search_graph_fuzz`.
2025-02-28 12:16:47 +01:00
Esteban Küber
5b54286640 Remove detail from label/note that is already available in other note
Remove the "which is required by `{root_obligation}`" post-script in
"the trait `X` is not implemented for `Y`" explanation in E0277. This
information is already conveyed in the notes explaining requirements,
making it redundant while making the text (particularly in labels)
harder to read.

```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `NotCopy: Copy` is not satisfied
  --> $DIR/wf-static-type.rs:10:13
   |
LL | static FOO: IsCopy<Option<NotCopy>> = IsCopy { t: None };
   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `Copy` is not implemented for `NotCopy`
   |
   = note: required for `Option<NotCopy>` to implement `Copy`
note: required by a bound in `IsCopy`
  --> $DIR/wf-static-type.rs:7:17
   |
LL | struct IsCopy<T:Copy> { t: T }
   |                 ^^^^ required by this bound in `IsCopy`
```
vs the prior

```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `NotCopy: Copy` is not satisfied
  --> $DIR/wf-static-type.rs:10:13
   |
LL | static FOO: IsCopy<Option<NotCopy>> = IsCopy { t: None };
   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `Copy` is not implemented for `NotCopy`, which is required by `Option<NotCopy>: Copy`
   |
   = note: required for `Option<NotCopy>` to implement `Copy`
note: required by a bound in `IsCopy`
  --> $DIR/wf-static-type.rs:7:17
   |
LL | struct IsCopy<T:Copy> { t: T }
   |                 ^^^^ required by this bound in `IsCopy`
```
2024-10-29 16:26:57 +00:00
lcnr
a6aeba83be update tests 2024-09-20 14:57:58 +00:00
lcnr
98bfd54b0a eagerly normalize when adding goals 2024-05-28 04:54:05 +00:00
lcnr
f99c9ffd88 track cycle participants per entry 2024-05-20 20:57:14 +00:00
Michael Goulet
d3e510eb9d Don't ICE because recomputing overflow goals during find_best_leaf_obligation causes inference side-effects 2024-05-16 10:00:11 -04:00
lcnr
83e6da0be5 analyse visitor: build proof tree in probe 2024-05-09 17:29:53 +00:00
Michael Goulet
6714216eaa Only consider ambiguous goals when finding best obligation for ambiguities 2024-05-04 12:05:36 -04:00
Michael Goulet
34e91ece90 Higher ranked goal source, do overflow handling less badly 2024-05-02 21:56:14 -04:00
Michael Goulet
3e03b1b190 Use a proof tree visitor to refine the Obligation for error reporting 2024-05-02 21:56:14 -04:00
lcnr
5ec9b8d778 distinguish recursion limit based overflow for diagnostics
also change the number of allowed fixpoint steps to be fixed instead
of using the `log` of the total recursion depth.
2024-02-29 10:14:02 +01:00
许杰友 Jieyou Xu (Joe)
ec2cc761bc [AUTO-GENERATED] Migrate ui tests from // to //@ directives 2024-02-16 20:02:50 +00:00
lcnr
5051637979 hide impls if trait bound is proven from env 2024-02-09 12:41:39 +01:00
lcnr
242633fe52 add comments and tests 2024-01-09 11:53:50 +01:00
lcnr
0947070871 consistently use "next solver" instead of "new solver" 2023-12-14 15:22:37 +01:00