It's crazy to have the integer methods in something close to random
order.
The reordering makes the gaps clear: `const_i64`, `const_i128`,
`const_isize`, and `const_u16`. I guess they just aren't needed.
In `get_fn` there is a complicated set of if/elses to determine if
`hidden` visibility should be applied. There are five calls to
`LLVMRustSetVisibility` and some repetition in the comments.
This commit streamlines it a bit:
- Computes `hidden` and then uses it to determine if a single call to
`LLVMRustSetVisibility` occurs.
- Converts some of the if/elses into boolean expressions.
- Removes the repetitive comments.
Overall this makes it quite a bit shorter, and I find it easier to read.
Never patterns constitute a read for unsafety
This code is otherwise unsound if we don't emit an unsafety error here. Noticed when fixing #130528, but it's totally unrelated.
r? `@Nadrieril`
Check params for unsafety in THIR
Self-explanatory. I'm not surprised this was overlooked, given the way that THIR visitors work. Perhaps we should provide a better entrypoint.
Fixes#130528
Further improve diagnostics for expressions in pattern position
Follow-up of #118625, see #121697.
```rs
fn main() {
match 'b' {
y.0.0.1.z().f()? as u32 => {},
}
}
```
Before:
```
error: expected one of `=>`, ``@`,` `if`, or `|`, found `.`
--> src/main.rs:3:10
|
3 | y.0.0.1.z().f()? as u32 => {},
| ^ expected one of `=>`, ``@`,` `if`, or `|`
```
After:
```
error: expected a pattern, found an expression
--> src/main.rs:3:9
|
3 | y.0.0.1.z().f()? as u32 => {},
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ arbitrary expressions are not allowed in patterns
|
help: consider moving the expression to a match arm guard
|
3 | val if val == y.0.0.1.z().f()? as u32 => {},
| ~~~ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
help: consider extracting the expression into a `const`
|
2 + const VAL: /* Type */ = y.0.0.1.z().f()? as u32;
3 ~ match 'b' {
4 ~ VAL => {},
|
help: consider wrapping the expression in an inline `const` (requires `#![feature(inline_const_pat)]`)
|
3 | const { y.0.0.1.z().f()? as u32 } => {},
| +++++++ +
```
---
r? fmease
`@rustbot` label +A-diagnostics +A-parser +A-patterns +C-enhancement
Update the minimum external LLVM to 18
With this change, we'll have stable support for LLVM 18 and 19.
For reference, the previous increase to LLVM 17 was #122649.
cc `@rust-lang/wg-llvm`
r? nikic
Reduce confusion about `make_indirect_byval` by renaming it
As part of doing so, remove the incorrect handling of the wasm target's `make_indirect_byval` (i.e. using it at all).
Gate `repr(Rust)` correctly on non-ADT items
#114201 added `repr(Rust)` but didn't add any attribute validation to it like `repr(C)` has, to only allow it on ADT items.
I consider this code to be nonsense, for example:
```
#[repr(Rust)]
fn foo() {}
```
Reminder that it's different from `extern "Rust"`, which *is* valid on function items. But also this now disallows `repr(Rust)` on modules, impls, traits, etc.
I'll crater it, if it looks bad then I'll add an FCW.
---
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/relnotes: Compatibility (minor breaking change).
Do not ICE with incorrect empty suggestion
When we have two types with the same name, one without type parameters and the other with type parameters and a derive macro, we were before incorrectly suggesting to remove type parameters from the former, which ICEd because we were suggesting to remove nothing. We now gate against this.
The output is still not perfect. E0107 should explicitly detect this case and provide better context, but for now let's avoid the ICE.
Fix#108748.
This commit adds basic support for reborrowing `Pin` types in argument
position. At the moment it only supports reborrowing `Pin<&mut T>` as
`Pin<&mut T>` by inserting a call to `Pin::as_mut()`, and only in
argument position (not as the receiver in a method call).
The previous name is just an LLVMism, which conveys almost nothing about
what is actually meant by the function relative to the ABI.
In doing so, remove an already-addressed FIXME.
When we have two types with the same name, one without type parameters and the other with type parameters and a derive macro, we were before incorrectly suggesting to remove type parameters from the former, which ICEd because we were suggesting to remove nothing. We now gate against this.
The output is still not perfect. E0107 should explicitly detect this case and provide better context, but for now let's avoid the ICE.
doc: the source of `LetStmt` can also be `AssignDesugar`
For example, the two following statements are desugared into a block whose `LetStmt` source is `AssignDesugar`:
```rust
_ = ignoring_some_result();
(a, b) = (b, a);
```
llvm-wrapper: adapt for LLVM API changes, second try
This is a re-work of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129749 after LLVM brought back the APIs used by rust.
No functional changes intended.
`@rustbot` label: +llvm-main
r? `@nikic`
cc: `@tmandry`
Improve handling of raw-idents in check-cfg
This PR improves the handling of raw-idents in the check-cfg diagnostics.
In particular the list of expected names and the suggestion now correctly take into account the "keyword-ness" of the ident, and correctly prefix the ident with `r#` when necessary.
`@rustbot` labels +F-check-cfg
