impl DispatchFromDyn for Cell and UnsafeCell
After some fruitful discussion on [Internals](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/impl-dispatchfromdyn-for-cell-2/16520) here's my first PR to rust-lang/rust 🎉
Please let me know if there's something I missed.
This adds `DispatchFromDyn` impls for `Cell`, `UnsafeCell` and `SyncUnsafeCell`.
An existing test is also expanded to test the `Cell` impl (which requires the `UnsafeCell` impl)
The different `RefCell` types can not implement `DispatchFromDyn` since they have more than one (non ZST) field.
**Edit:**
### What:
These changes allow one to make types like `MyRc`(code below), to be object safe method receivers after implementing `DispatchFromDyn` and `Deref` for them.
This allows for code like this:
```rust
struct MyRc<T: ?Sized>(Cell<NonNull<RcBox<T>>>);
/* impls for DispatchFromDyn, CoerceUnsized and Deref for MyRc*/
trait Trait {
fn foo(self: MyRc<Self>);
}
let impls_trait = ...;
let rc = MyRc::new(impls_trait) as MyRc<dyn Trait>;
rc.foo();
```
Note: `Cell` and `UnsafeCell` won't directly become valid method receivers since they don't implement `Deref`. Making use of these changes requires a wrapper type and nightly features.
### Why:
A custom pointer type with interior mutability allows one to store extra information in the pointer itself.
These changes allow for such a type to be a method receiver.
### Examples:
My use case is a cycle aware custom `Rc` implementation that when dropping a cycle marks some references dangling.
On the [forum](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/impl-dispatchfromdyn-for-cell/14762/8) andersk mentioned that they track if a `Gc` reference is rooted with an extra bit in the reference itself.
Rollup of 11 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #106407 (Improve proc macro attribute diagnostics)
- #106960 (Teach parser to understand fake anonymous enum syntax)
- #107085 (Custom MIR: Support binary and unary operations)
- #107086 (Print PID holding bootstrap build lock on Linux)
- #107175 (Fix escaping inference var ICE in `point_at_expr_source_of_inferred_type`)
- #107204 (suggest qualifying bare associated constants)
- #107248 (abi: add AddressSpace field to Primitive::Pointer )
- #107272 (Implement ObjectSafe and WF in the new solver)
- #107285 (Implement `Generator` and `Future` in the new solver)
- #107286 (ICE in new solver if we see an inference variable)
- #107313 (Add Style Team Triagebot config)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
abi: add AddressSpace field to Primitive::Pointer
...and remove it from `PointeeInfo`, which isn't meant for this.
There are still various places (marked with FIXMEs) that assume all pointers
have the same size and alignment. Fixing this requires parsing non-default
address spaces in the data layout string (and various other changes),
which will be done in a followup.
(That is, if it's actually worth it to support multiple different pointer sizes.
There is a lot of code that would be affected by that.)
Fixes#106367
r? ``@oli-obk``
cc ``@Patryk27``
Fix escaping inference var ICE in `point_at_expr_source_of_inferred_type`
Fixes#107158
`point_at_expr_source_of_inferred_type` uses `lookup_probe` to adjust the self type of a method receiver -- but that method returns inference variables from inside a probe. That means that the ty vars are no longer valid, so we can't use any infcx methods on them.
Also, pass some extra span info to hack a quick solution to bad labels, resulting in this diagnostic improvement:
```rust
fn example2() {
let mut x = vec![1];
x.push("");
}
```
```diff
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> src/main.rs:5:12
|
5 | x.push("");
| ---- ^^
| | |
| | expected integer, found `&str`
- | | this is of type `&'static str`, which causes `x` to be inferred as `Vec<{integer}>`
| arguments to this method are incorrect
```
(since that "which causes `x` to be inferred as `Vec<{integer}>` part is wrong)
r? `@estebank`
(we really should make this code better in general, cc #106590, but that's a bit bigger issue that needs some more thinking about)
Custom MIR: Support binary and unary operations
Lower binary and unary operations directly to corresponding unchecked MIR
operations. Ultimately this might not be syntax we want, but it allows for
experimentation in the meantime.
r? ````@oli-obk```` ````@JakobDegen````
Teach parser to understand fake anonymous enum syntax
Parse `Ty | OtherTy` in function argument and return types.
Parse type ascription in top level patterns.
Minimally address #100741.
InstCombine away intrinsic validity assertions
This optimization (currently) fires 246 times on the standard library. It seems to fire hardly at all on the big crates in the benchmark suite. Interesting.
Delete `SimplifyArmIdentity` and `SimplifyBranchSame` mir opts
I had attempted to fix the first of these opts in #94177 . However, despite that PR already being a full re-write, it still did not fix some of the core soundness issues. The optimizations that are attempted here are likely to be desirable, but I do not expect any of the currently written code to survive into a sound implementation. Deleting the code keeps us from having to maintain the passes in the meantime.
Closes#77359 , closes#72800 , closes#78628
r? ```@cjgillot```
rustdoc: rearrange HTML in primitive reference links
This patch avoids hard-to-click single character links by making the generic part of the link:
Before: <a href="#">&</a>T
After: <a href="#">&T</a>
Suggest using a lock for `*Cell: Sync` bounds
I mostly did this for `OnceCell<T>` at first because users will be confused to see that the `OnceCell<T>` in `std` isn't `Sync` but then extended it to `Cell<T>` and `RefCell<T>` as well.
Add hint for missing lifetime bound on trait object when type alias is used
Fix issue #103582.
The problem: When a type alias is used to specify the return type of the method in a trait impl, the suggestion for fixing the problem of "missing lifetime bound on trait object" of the trait impl will not be created. The issue caused by the code which searches for the return trait objects when constructing the hint suggestion is not able to find the trait objects since they are specified in the type alias path instead of the return path of the trait impl.
The solution: Trace the trait objects in the type alias path and provide them along with the alias span to generate the suggestion in case the type alias is used in return type of the method in the trait impl.
rustdoc: simplify settings popover DOM, CSS, JS
* Change the class names so that they all start with `setting-`. That should make it harder to accidentally use a setting class outside the settings popover, where loading the CSS might accidentally change the styles of something unrelated.
* Get rid of an unnecessary wrapper DIV around the radio button line.
* Simplify CSS selectors by making the DOM easier and more intuitive to target.
* Remove dead settings JS for obsolete select-wrapper
Add suggestion to remove if in let..else block
Adds an additional hint to failures where we encounter an else keyword while we're parsing an if-let expression.
This is likely that the user has accidentally mixed if-let and let..else together.
Fixes#103791.
- On compiler-error's suggestion of moving this lower down the stack,
along the path of `report_mismatched_types()`, which is used
by `rustc_hir_analysis` and `rustc_hir_typeck`.
- update ui tests, add test
- add suggestions for references to fn pointers
- modify `TypeErrCtxt::same_type_modulo_infer` to take `T: relate::Relate` instead of `Ty`
Adds an additional hint to failures where we encounter an else keyword
while we're parsing an if-let block.
This is likely that the user has accidentally mixed if-let and let...else
together.
* Changes the class names so that they all start with `setting-`.
That should make it harder to accidentally use a setting class outside
the settings popover, where loading the CSS might accidentally change
the styles of something unrelated.
* Get rid of an unnecessary wrapper DIV around the radio button line.
* Simplify CSS selectors by making the DOM easier and more intuitive
to target.
