always check alignment during CTFE
We originally disabled alignment checks because they got in the way -- there are some things we do with the interpreter during CTFE which does not correspond to actually running user-written code, but is purely administrative, and we didn't want alignment checks there, so we just disabled them entirely. But with `-Zextra-const-ub-checks` we anyway had to figure out how to disable those alignment checks while doing checks in regular code. So now it is easy to enable CTFE alignment checking by default. Let's see what the perf consequences of that are.
r? `@oli-obk`
Various cleanups to dest prop
This makes fixing the issues identified in #105577 easier. A couple changes
- Use an enum with names instead of a bool
- Only call `remove_candidates_if` from one place instead of two. Doing it from two places is far too fragile, since any divergence in the behavior between those callsites is likely to be unsound.
- Remove `is_constant`. Right now we only merge locals, so this doesn't do anything, and the logic would be wrong if it did.
r? `@tmiasko`
Auto traits in `dyn Trait + Auto` are suggestable
Not sure why I had made the `IsSuggestableVisitor` have that rule to not consider `dyn Trait + Auto` to be suggestable.
It's possible that this was done because of the fact that we don't print the right parentheses for `&(dyn Trait + Auto)`, but that's a problem with printing these types in general that we probably have tracked somewhere else...
Ensure async trait impls are async (or otherwise return an opaque type)
As a workaround for the full `#[refine]` semantics not being implemented
yet, forbit returning a concrete future type like `Box<dyn Future>` or a
manually implemented Future.
`-> impl Future` is still permitted; while that can also cause
accidental refinement, that's behind a different feature gate
(`return_position_impl_trait_in_trait`) and that problem exists
regardless of whether the trait method is async, so will have to be
solved more generally.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/102745
Highlight conflicting param-env candidates, again
Un-reverts #98794 (i.e. reverts #99290).
The previous time I attempted to land this PR, it was because of an incremental issue (#99233). The repro instructions in the issue is no longer manifest the ICE -- I think it's because this ambiguity code was refactored (I think by `@lcnr)` to no longer store the ambiguities in the fulfillment error, but instead recompute them on the fly.
The main motivation for trying to re-land this is that it fixes#105131 by highlighting the root-cause of the issue, which is conflicting param-env candidates:
```
error[E0283]: type annotations needed: cannot satisfy `Self: Gen<'source>`
|
note: multiple `impl`s or `where` clauses satisfying `Self: Gen<'source>` found
--> $DIR/conflicting-bounds.rs:3:1
|
LL | pub trait Gen<'source> {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
...
LL | Self: for<'s> Gen<'s, Output = T>;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0283`.
```
Fixes#105131.
Fixes (again) #98786
Sync rustc_codegen_cranelift
This time there are a bunch of bugfixes, some new llvm intrinsic implementations and refactorings to the build system in preparation for running cg_clif tests as part of `./x.py test`.
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` label +A-codegen +A-cranelift +T-compiler
As a workaround for the full `#[refine]` semantics not being implemented
yet, forbit returning a concrete future type like `Box<dyn Future>` or a
manually implemented Future.
`-> impl Future` is still permitted; while that can also cause
accidental refinement, that's behind a different feature gate
(`return_position_impl_trait_in_trait`) and that problem exists
regardless of whether the trait method is async, so will have to be
solved more generally.
Fixes#102745
