Relax ordering rules for `asm!` operands
The `asm!` and `global_asm!` macros require their operands to appear strictly in the following order:
- Template strings
- Positional operands
- Named operands
- Explicit register operands
- `clobber_abi`
- `options`
This is overly strict and can be inconvienent when building complex `asm!` statements with macros. This PR relaxes the ordering requirements as follows:
- Template strings must still come before all other operands.
- Positional operands must still come before named and explicit register operands.
- Named and explicit register operands can be freely mixed.
- `options` and `clobber_abi` can appear in any position after the template strings.
r? ```````@joshtriplett```````
Don't even try to combine consts with incompatible types
~I left a more detailed explanation for why this fixes this issue in the UI test, but in general, we should not try to unify const infer vars and rigid consts if they have incompatible types. That's because we don't want something like a `ConstArgHasType` predicate to suddenly go from passing to failing, or vice versa, due to a shallow resolve.~
1. Use the `type_of` for a parameter in `try_eval_lit_or_param`, instead of the "expected" type from a `WithOptConstParam` def id.
2. Don't combine consts that have incompatible types.
Fixes#108781
feat: implement better error for manual impl of `Fn*` traits
Fixes#39259
cc `@estebank` (you gave me some advice in the linked issue, would you like to review?)
Do not ICE when we have fn pointer `Fn` obligations with bound vars in the self type
We never supported solving `for<'a> fn(&'a ()): Fn(&'a ())` -- I tried to add that support in #104929, but iirc `@lcnr` wanted to support this more generally by eagerly instantiating trait predicate binders with placeholders. That never happened due to blockers in the old solver, but we probably shouldn't ICE in any case.
On the bright side, this passes on the new solver :^)
Emit alias-eq when equating numeric var and projection
This doesn't fix everything having to do with projections and infer vars, but it does fix a common case I saw in HIR typeck.
r? `@lcnr`
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #108879 (Unconstrained terms should account for infer vars being equated)
- #108936 (Rustdoc: don't hide anonymous reexport)
- #108940 (Add myself to compiler reviewers list)
- #108945 (Make some report and emit errors take DefIds instead of BodyIds)
- #108946 (Document the resulting values produced when using `From<bool>` on floats)
- #108956 (Make ptr::from_ref and ptr::from_mut in #106116 const.)
- #108960 (Remove `body_def_id` from `Inherited`)
- #108963 (only call git on git checkouts during bootstrap)
- #108964 (Fix the docs for pointer method with_metadata_of)
Failed merges:
- #108950 (Directly construct Inherited in typeck.)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Introduce a no-op `PlaceMention` statement for `let _ =`.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/54003
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/80059
Split from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/101500
This PR introduces a new `PlaceMention` statement dedicated to matches that neither introduce bindings nor ascribe types. Without this, all traces of the match would vanish from MIR, making it impossible to diagnose unsafety or use in #101500.
This allows to mark `let _ = <unsafe union access or dereference>` as requiring an unsafe block.
Nominating for lang team, as this introduces an extra error.
Remove `body_def_id` from `Inherited`
We can just use the body id from the obligation cause.
Follow-up to #108945, only my commit is relevant.
r? `@cjgillot` cc `@spastorino`
Unconstrained terms should account for infer vars being equated
Follow-up from the canonicalization PR, wanted to break this one out so I can approve the other PR.
r? `@lcnr`
This is fixed by simply using the currently registered target in the
current session. We need to use it because of target json that are not
by design included in the rustc list of targets.
feat/refactor: improve errors in case of ident with number at start
Improve parser code when we parse a integer (or float) literal but expect an identifier. We emit an error message saying that identifiers can't begin with numbers. This PR just improves that code and expands it to all identifiers. Note that I haven't implemented error recovery (this didn't exist before anyway), I might do that in a follow up PR.
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #108754 (Retry `pred_known_to_hold_modulo_regions` with fulfillment if ambiguous)
- #108759 (1.41.1 supported 32-bit Apple targets)
- #108839 (Canonicalize root var when making response from new solver)
- #108856 (Remove DropAndReplace terminator)
- #108882 (Tweak E0740)
- #108898 (Set `LIBC_CHECK_CFG=1` when building Rust code in bootstrap)
- #108911 (Improve rustdoc-gui/tester.js code a bit)
- #108916 (Remove an unused return value in `rustc_hir_typeck`)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
