Only prefer param-env candidates if they remain non-global after norm
Introduce `CandidateSource::GlobalParamEnv`, and dynamically compute the `CandidateSource` based on whether the predicate contains params *post-normalization*.
This code needs some cleanup and documentation. I'm just putting this up for review.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/179
r? lcnr
allow deref patterns to participate in exhaustiveness analysis
Per [this proposal](https://hackmd.io/4qDDMcvyQ-GDB089IPcHGg#Exhaustiveness), this PR allows deref patterns to participate in exhaustiveness analysis. Currently all deref patterns enforce `DerefPure` bounds on their scrutinees, so this assumes all patterns it's analyzing are well-behaved. This also doesn't support [mixed exhaustiveness](https://hackmd.io/4qDDMcvyQ-GDB089IPcHGg#Mixed-exhaustiveness), and instead emits an error if deref patterns are used together with normal constructors. I think mixed exhaustiveness would be nice to have (especially if we eventually want to support arbitrary `Deref` impls[^1]), but it'd require more work to get reasonable diagnostics[^2].
Tracking issue for deref patterns: #87121
r? `@Nadrieril`
[^1]: Regardless of whether we support limited exhaustiveness checking for untrusted `Deref` or always require other arms to be exhaustive, I think it'd be useful to allow mixed matching for user-defined smart pointers. And it'd be strange if it worked there but not for `Cow`.
[^2]: I think listing out witnesses of non-exhaustiveness can be confusing when they're not necessarily disjoint, and when you only need to cover some of them, so we'd probably want special formatting and/or explanatory subdiagnostics. And if it's implemented similarly to unions, we'd probably also want some way of merging witnesses; the way witnesses for unions can appear duplicated is pretty unfortunate. I'm not sure yet how the diagnostics should look, especially for deeply nested patterns.
[rustdoc] Ensure that temporary doctest folder is correctly removed even if doctests failed
Fixes#139899.
The bug was due to the fact that if any doctest fails for any reason, we call `exit` (or it's called inside `libtest` if not edition 2024), meaning that `TempDir`'s destructor isn't called, and therefore the temporary folder isn't cleaned up.
Took me a while to figure out how to reproduce but finally I was able to reproduce the bug with:
`````rust
#![doc(test(attr(deny(warnings))))]
//! ```
//! let a = 12;
//! ```
`````
And then I ensured that panicking doctests were cleaned up as well:
`````rust
//! ```
//! panic!();
//! ```
`````
And finally I checked if it was fixed for merged doctests too (`--edition 2024`).
To make this work, I needed to add a new public function in `libtest` too which would call a function once all tests have been run.
So only issue is: I have absolutely no idea how we can add a regression test for this fix. If anyone has an idea...
r? `@notriddle`
Don't crash on error codes passed to `--explain` which exceed our internal limit of 9999
removed panic in case where we do `--explain > 9999` and added check for it
now error looks like this instead of ICE
```
$ rustc.exe --explain E10000
error: E10000 is not a valid error code
```
fixes#140647
r? `@fmease`
Parser: Recover error from named params while parse_path
Fixes#140169
I added test to the first commit and the second added the code and changes to test.
r? `@petrochenkov`
Without adding proper support for mixed exhaustiveness, mixing deref
patterns with normal constructors would either violate
`ConstructorSet::split`'s invariant 4 or 7. We'd either be ignoring rows
with normal constructors or we'd have problems in unspecialization from
non-disjoint constructors. Checking mixed exhaustivenss similarly to how
unions are currently checked should work, but the diagnostics for unions
are confusing. Since mixing deref patterns with normal constructors is
pretty niche (currently it only makes sense for `Cow`), emitting an
error lets us avoid committing to supporting mixed exhaustiveness
without a good answer for the diagnostics.
This does not yet handle the case of mixed deref patterns with normal
constructors; it'll ICE in `Constructor::is_covered_by`. That'll be
fixed in a later commit.
support duplicate entries in the opaque_type_storage
Necessary for the new solver as we may unify keys when eagerly resolving for canonical queries. See the relevant comment when instantiating query responses:
```rust
// We eagerly resolve inference variables when computing the query response.
// This can cause previously distinct opaque type keys to now be structurally equal.
//
// To handle this, we store any duplicate entries in a separate list to check them
// at the end of typeck/borrowck. We could alternatively eagerly equate the hidden
// types here. However, doing so is difficult as it may result in nested goals and
// any errors may make it harder to track the control flow for diagnostics.
if let Some(prev) = prev {
self.delegate.add_duplicate_opaque_type(key, prev, self.origin_span);
}
```
This will be far more relevant with #140497.
r? `@compiler-errors`
coverage: Only merge adjacent coverage spans
For a long time, coverage instrumentation has automatically “merged” spans with the same control-flow into a smaller number of larger spans, even when the spans being merged are not overlapping or adjacent. This causes any source text between the original spans to be included in the merged span, which is then associated with an execution count when shown in coverage reports.
That approach causes a number of problems:
- The intervening source text can contain all sorts of things that shouldn't really be marked as executable code (e.g. nested items, parts of macro invocations, long comments). In some cases we have complicated workarounds (e.g. bucketing to avoid merging spans across nested items), but in other cases there isn't much we can do.
- Merging can have aesthetically weird effects, such as including unbalanced parentheses, because the merging process doesn't really understand what it's doing at a source code level.
- It generally leads to an accumulation of piled-on heuristics and special cases that give decent-looking results, but are fiendishly difficult to modify or replace.
Therefore, this PR aims to abolish the merging of non-adjacent coverage spans.
The big tradeoff here is that the resulting coverage metadata (embedded in the instrumented binary) tends to become larger, because the overall number of distinct spans has increased. That's unfortunate, but I see it as the inevitable cost of cleaning up the messes and inaccuracies that were caused by the old approach. And the resulting spans do tend to be more accurate to the program's actual control-flow.
---
The `.coverage` snapshot changes give an indication of how this PR will affect user-visible coverage reports. In many cases the changes to reporting are minor or even nonexistent, despite substantial changes to the metadata (as indicated by `.cov-map` snapshots).
---
try-job: aarch64-gnu
Rollup of 4 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #140135 (Unify sidebar buttons to use the same image)
- #140632 (add a test for issue rust-lang/rust#81317)
- #140658 (`deref_patterns`: let string and byte string literal patterns peel references and smart pointers before matching)
- #140681 (Don't ignore compiler stderr in `lib-defaults.rs`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
`deref_patterns`: let string and byte string literal patterns peel references and smart pointers before matching
This follows up on #140028. Together, they allow using string and byte string literal patterns to match on smart pointers when `deref_patterns` is enabled. In particular, string literals can now match on `String`, subsuming the functionality of the `string_deref_patterns` feature.
More generally, this works by letting literals peel references (and smart pointers) before matching, similar to most other patterns, providing an answer to #44849. Though it's only partially implemented at this point: this doesn't yet let named const patterns peel before matching. The peeling logic is general enough to support named consts, but the typing rules for named const patterns would need adjustments to feel consistent (e.g. arrays would need rules to be usable as slices, and `const STR: &'static str` wouldn't be able to match on a `String` unless a rule was added to let it be used where a `str` is expected, similar to what #140028 did for literals).
This also allows string and byte string patterns to match on mutable references, following up on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/140028#discussion_r2053927512. Rather than forward the mutability of the scrutinee to literal patterns, I've opted to peel `&mut`s from the scrutinee. From a design point of view, this makes the behavior consistent with what would be expected from deref coercions using the methodology in the next paragraph. From a diagnostics point of view, this avoids labeling string and byte string patterns as "mutable references", which I think could be confusing. See [`byte-string-type-errors.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/compare/master...dianne:rust:lit-deref-pats-p2?expand=1#diff-4a0dd9b164b67c706751f3c0b5762ddab08bcef05a91972beb0190c6c1cd3706) for how the diagnostics look.
At a high level, the peeling logic implemented here tries to mimic how deref coercions work for expressions: we peel references (and smart pointers) from the scrutinee until the pattern can match against it, and no more. This is primarily tested by [`const-pats-do-not-mislead-inference.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/compare/master...dianne:rust:lit-deref-pats-p2?expand=1#diff-19afc05b8aae9a30fe4a3a8c0bc2ab2c56b58755a45cdf5c12be0d5e83c4739d). To illustrate the connection, I wasn't sure if this made sense to include in the test file, but I've translated those tests to make sure they give the same inference results as deref coercions: [(playground)](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2024&gist=1869744cb9cdfed71a686990aadf9fe1). In each case, a reference to the scrutinee is coerced to have the type of the pattern (under a reference).
Tracking issue for deref patterns: #87121
r? `@oli-obk`
cc `@Nadrieril`
Be a bit more relaxed about not yet constrained infer vars in closure upvar analysis
See the writeup in `tests/ui/closures/opaque-upvar.rs`.
TL;DR is that this has to do with the fact that the recursive revealing uses, which have not yet been constrained from the defining use by the time that closure upvar inference is performed, remain as infer vars during upvar analysis. We don't really care, though, since anywhere we structurally match on a type in upvar analysis, we already call `structurally_resolve_type` right before `.kind()`, which would emit a true ambiguity error.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/197
r? lcnr
