Instead of updating global state to mark attributes as used,
we now explicitly emit a warning when an attribute is used in
an unsupported position. As a side effect, we are to emit more
detailed warning messages (instead of just a generic "unused" message).
`Session.check_name` is removed, since its only purpose was to mark
the attribute as used. All of the callers are modified to use
`Attribute.has_name`
Additionally, `AttributeType::AssumedUsed` is removed - an 'assumed
used' attribute is implemented by simply not performing any checks
in `CheckAttrVisitor` for a particular attribute.
We no longer emit unused attribute warnings for the `#[rustc_dummy]`
attribute - it's an internal attribute used for tests, so it doesn't
mark sense to treat it as 'unused'.
With this commit, a large source of global untracked state is removed.
Match against attribute name when validating attributes
Extract attribute name once and match it against symbols that are being
validated, instead of using `Session::check_name` for each symbol
individually.
Assume that all validated attributes are used, instead of marking them
as such, since the attribute check should be exhaustive.
Extract attribute name once and match it against symbols that are being
validated, instead of using `Session::check_name` for each symbol
individually.
Assume that all validated attributes are used, instead of marking them
as such, since the attribute check should be exhaustive.
Rename `#[doc(spotlight)]` to `#[doc(notable_trait)]`
Fixes#80936.
"spotlight" is not a very specific or self-explaining name.
Additionally, the dialog that it triggers is called "Notable traits".
So, "notable trait" is a better name.
* Rename `#[doc(spotlight)]` to `#[doc(notable_trait)]`
* Rename `#![feature(doc_spotlight)]` to `#![feature(doc_notable_trait)]`
* Update documentation
* Improve documentation
r? `@Manishearth`
rustdoc: allow list syntax for #[doc(alias)] attributes
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81205.
It now allows to have:
```rust
#[doc(alias = "x")]
// and:
#[doc(alias("y", "z"))]
```
cc ``@jplatte``
r? ``@jyn514``
StructField -> FieldDef ("field definition")
Field -> ExprField ("expression field", not "field expression")
FieldPat -> PatField ("pattern field", not "field pattern")
Also rename visiting and other methods working on them.
"spotlight" is not a very specific or self-explaining name.
Additionally, the dialog that it triggers is called "Notable traits".
So, "notable trait" is a better name.
* Rename `#[doc(spotlight)]` to `#[doc(notable_trait)]`
* Rename `#![feature(doc_spotlight)]` to `#![feature(doc_notable_trait)]`
* Update documentation
* Improve documentation
Find more invalid doc attributes
- Lint on `#[doc(123)]`, `#[doc("hello")]`, etc.
- Lint every attribute; e.g., will now report two warnings for `#[doc(foo, bar)]`
- Add hyphen to "crate level"
- Display paths like `#[doc(foo::bar)]` correctly instead of as an empty string
This change makes it easier to follow the control flow.
I also moved the end-of-line comments attached to some symbols to before
the symbol listing. This allows rustfmt to format the code; otherwise no
formatting occurs (see rust-lang/rustfmt#4750).
Cleanup rustdoc warnings
## Clean up error reporting for deprecated passes
Using `error!` here goes all the way back to the original commit, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/8540. I don't see any reason to use logging; rustdoc should use diagnostics wherever possible. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/81932#issuecomment-785291244 for further context.
- Use spans for deprecated attributes
- Use a proper diagnostic for unknown passes, instead of error logging
- Add tests for unknown passes
- Improve some wording in diagnostics
## Report that `doc(plugins)` doesn't work using diagnostics instead of `eprintln!`
This also adds a test for the output.
This was added in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/52194. I don't see any particular reason not to use diagnostics here, I think it was just missed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/50541.
